UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )

Filed by the RegistrantSx

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant£o

Check the appropriate box:

£
oPreliminary Proxy Statement

£
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

S
xDefinitive Proxy Statement

£
oDefinitive Additional Materials

£
oSoliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Albany International Corp.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other thanOther Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

S
xNo fee required.

£
oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(Set (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

£
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.

£
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:



a4093x1x11.jpg

March 27, 2019

31, 2021

To the Stockholders of Albany International Corp.:


You are cordially invited to attend the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Albany International Corp., which will be held at The One Hundred Club, 100 Market Street, Suite 500, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, at 9:00 a.m. on Friday,Thursday May 10, 2019.

13, 2021. Due to the continuing coronavirus pandemic we have again decided to hold the Annual Meeting virtually this year. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting by visiting http://www.meetingcenter.io/269002791.


Whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. Therefore, you are urged to vote and submit your proxy promptly by phone, online, or by signing, dating, and returning a proxy card. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to vote in person,online, even if you have previously submitted your proxy.

    ��If you plan to attend the meeting, and have requested and received physical copies of these meeting materials, please so indicate on the enclosed proxy card so that we can make the necessary arrangements. (An addressed, postage-prepaid envelope is enclosed for your return of the proxy.)


Information about the meeting, including a description of the various matters on which the stockholders will act, can be found in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. The Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, also accompanies these materials.


Sincerely yours,


  
kailbourne-sig1.jpg
higgins-sig1.jpg
ERLAND E. KAILBOURNEA. WILLIAM HIGGINSOLIVIER JARRAULT
Chairman of the BoardPresident and Chief Executive Officer



ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 10, 2019

13, 2021

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Albany International Corp. will be held at The One Hundred Club, 100 Market Street, Suite 500, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, on Friday,Thursday, May 10, 2019,13, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

1.To elect ten Directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified;
2.to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor;
3.to approve, by nonbinding vote, executive compensation; and
4.to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.


1. To elect nine Directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified;

2. to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor;

3. to approve, by nonbinding vote, executive compensation; and

4. to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

You will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions prior to and during the Annual Meeting. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting at http://www.meetingcenter.io/269002791, you will need your 15-digit control number and the password AIN2021. There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting.

If you are a registered holder of Company shares (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), please follow the instructions on your proxy card or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. If you hold your shares through an intermediary (i.e., a broker, bank or other financial institution), you must register in advance to attend, vote, and submit questions or comments at the Annual Meeting online. (See “Instructions/Q&A Section” beginning on page 2.)

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 18, 2019,19, 2021, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.


Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, in person, we urge you to vote your shares at your earliest convenience by telephone, online, or by signing, dating, and returning a proxy card. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option.

CHARLES J. SILVA, JR.
Secretary

JOSEPH M. GAUG
Secretary
March 27, 2019

31, 2021



PROXY STATEMENT


This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Albany International Corp. (“the Company”), 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire, of proxies in the accompanying form for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2019,13, 2021, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof.


Annual Meeting

As part of our effort to maintain a safe and healthy environment at our Annual Meeting and after closely monitoring statements issued by the World Health Organization (who.int) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov) regarding COVID-19, we have again decided to hold the Annual Meeting virtually this year.

Voting Procedures


Each properly executed proxy in the accompanying form received prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted with respect to all shares represented thereby and will be voted in accordance with the specifications, if any, made thereon.If no specification is made, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors. In addition, the shares will be voted in the discretion of the proxies with respect to (1) any matter of which we did not have notice prior to February 11, 2019,2021, (2) the election of a person as a director in substitution for a nominee named in this proxy statement who, at the time of the meeting, is unable, or for good cause is unwilling, to serve, (3) any stockholder proposal properly excluded from this proxy statement, and (4) matters incident to the conduct of the meeting, or any other matters as may properly come before the meeting. A proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the voting thereof.


If a stockholder is a participant in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan (sponsored by our transfer agent, Computershare) or the Albany International Corp. ProsperityPlus 401(k) Savings Plan, a properly executed proxy will also serve as voting instructions with respect to shares in the stockholder’s accounts in such plans. In order for the plan trustee to vote 401(k) plan account shares, instructions must be received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 6, 2019.

10, 2021.


This proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are first being made available to our stockholders on or about March 27, 2019.

31, 2021.


The only persons entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (including any adjournment or adjournments) are holders of record at the close of business on March 18, 2019,19, 2021, of the Company’s Class A and Class B Common Stock outstanding on such date. As of March 18, 2019,19, 2021, there were 29,059,78230,750,272 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock outstanding and 3,233,9981,617,998 shares of our Class B Common Stock outstanding. Each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes, on each matter to be voted upon.


Any shareholder attending this year’s virtual Annual Meeting will be considered “present” and “in person”. Under our By Laws, a copy of which is available at the Corporate Governance section of our website (www.albint.com), the presence, in person or by proxy, of shares having a majority of the total number of votes entitled to be cast at the meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. Under Delaware law, if a quorum is present, a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting by the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote is required for the election of directors. A majority of the voting power of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock present in person or by proxy, voting together as a single class, is required for any other action. Shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote that abstain or fail to vote on any matter will be counted as present and entitled to vote but such abstention or failure to vote will not be counted as an affirmative or negative vote and thus will have the same effect as a vote “Against” each of the matters scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting (other than the election of directors).


Under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, brokerage firms are permitted to vote in their discretion on certain routine matters on behalf of clients who have been requested to provide voting instructions, and have failed to do so by a date specified in a statement from the brokerage firm accompanying proxy materials distributed to its clients. Brokerage firms generally do not have such discretion as to any contested action, any authorization for a merger or consolidation, any equity-compensation plan or other matter related to executive compensation, any election of directors, or any matter that may affect substantially the rights or privileges of stockholders. In such a case, broker “nonvotes” are treated as shares that are present at the meeting but failare not eligible to vote. The Company anticipates that brokerage firms will be able to vote in their discretion only on the proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as independent auditor. Broker “nonvotes” will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the Annual Meeting, assuming that a quorum is present.

1 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     All of the members of the Board of Directors are elected annually to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Pursuant to our By Laws, the Board of Directors may increase or decrease the number of directors from time to time, but not to fewer than three. The Board of Directors has determined that, until further action by the Board, the number of directors of the Company, from and after the time of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall be ten. Accordingly, the number of directors to be elected at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is ten. The Board of Directors has nominated for election the ten persons listed below. All of the nominees are currently serving as directors, with the exception of Mark J. Murphy. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy, the shares represented by a proxy in the accompanying form will be voted for the election of the ten persons listed below. If, at the time of the meeting, any nominee is unable, or for good cause unwilling, to serve, which event is not anticipated, the shares will be voted for a substitute nominee proposed by the Board of Directors, unless the Board reduces the number of directors. The biographical sketches of each nominee below highlight some of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that contributed to his or her selection by the Board.


CHRISTINE L. STANDISH has been a Director of the Company since 1997. From 1989 to 1991, she served the Company as a Corporate Marketing Associate, and was previously employed as a Graphic Designer for Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. She is a director and executive officer of J. S. Standish Company. J. S. Standish Company and related persons hold in the aggregate shares entitling them to cast a majority of the combined votes entitled to be cast by all stockholders of the Company. As the Board seeks to safeguard and promote the interests of the Company’s stockholders, oversee Company management, and otherwise discharge its fiduciary obligations, Ms. Standish is able to provide a direct perspective as the representative of one of the Company’s largest stockholder groups. Age 53.

1



ERLAND E. KAILBOURNE has been a Director of the Company since 1999 and served as Chairman of the Board from May 2008 until February 2019. He retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (New York Region) of Fleet National Bank, a banking subsidiary of Fleet Financial Group, Inc., in 1998. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fleet Bank, also a banking subsidiary of Fleet Financial Group, Inc., from 1993 until its merger into Fleet National Bank in 1997, and also served as Vice Chairman of the State University of New York from 1995 until 1999. He is a Director of Rand Capital Corporation, Allegany Co-op Insurance Company and Rev LNG, LLC. Mr. Kailbourne’s broad experience as a director on numerous boards of public and private companies and foundations, his 38 years of experience in banking and finance, and his operational experience as chief executive officer of large organizations make him a valuable addition to the board of any public or private company, especially in oversight of risk management, liquidity, and finance matters. Age 77.

Instruction/Q&A Section
Q:How can I attend the Annual Meeting?
A:The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted exclusively online. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of the Company as of the close of business on the Record Date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. No physical meeting will be held.
You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting virtually and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting http://www.meetingcenter.io/269002791. You also will be able to vote your shares online by attending the Annual Meeting virtually.
To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need your 15-digit control number. Please carefully review the information included on your proxy card and on your Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. The password for the meeting is AIN2021.
If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance using the instructions below.
The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting prior to the start time leaving ample time for the check in. Please follow the registration instructions outlined in this proxy statement.
Q:How do I register to virtually attend the Annual Meeting?
A:If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the Annual Meeting virtually. Please follow the instructions on the proxy card or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials that you received.
If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance to attend, vote, and submit questions at the Annual Meeting online.
To register to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your Company holdings along with your name and email address to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, on May 7, 2021.
You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after we receive your registration materials.
Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare at the following:
By email
Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com
By mail
Computershare
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL Legal Proxy
P.O. Box 43001
Providence, RI 02940-3001

2

Q:How can I submit questions if I attend the Annual Meeting virtually?
A:If you wish to submit a question, you may do so in a few ways. If you want to ask a question before the Annual Meeting, you may do so at http://www.meetingcenter.io/269002791. You will need your 15-digit control number and the password AIN2021 found on your proxy card. If you hold our shares through a broker, you must register in advance using the instructions above.
If you want to submit a question before or during the Annual Meeting, you may do so by logging into the virtual meeting platform at http://www.meetingcenter.io/269002791, entering your 15-digital control number and the password AIN2021, and typing your question into the “Ask a Question” field. Click on the arrow icon to submit.
Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be addressed during the Annual Meeting, subject to time constraints. Questions that relate to proposals that are not properly before the Annual Meeting, relate to matters that are not proper subject for action by stockholders, are irrelevant to the Company’s business, relate to material non-public information of the Company, relate to personal concerns or grievances, are derogatory to individuals or that are otherwise in bad taste, are in substance repetitious of a question or comment made by another stockholder, or are not otherwise suitable for the conduct of the Annual Meeting as determined in the sole discretion of the Company, will not be answered. Additional rules of conduct and procedures may apply during the Annual Meeting and will be available for you to review in advance of the meeting at http://www.meetingcenter.io/269002791.
Any questions pertinent to meeting matters that cannot be answered during the Annual Meeting due to time constraints will be posted online and answered at the Company’s website – www.albint.com. The questions and answers will be available as soon as practical after the meeting and will remain available until one week after posting.
Q:What if I have trouble accessing the Annual Meeting virtually?
A:The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong WiFi connection wherever they intend to participate in the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to access the virtual meeting platform prior to the start time. Please allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 8:00 a.m. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting platform during the check-in time or during the Annual Meeting, please 1-888-724-2416 for technical assistance.
3


JOHN F. CASSIDY, JR. has been a Director of the Company since November 2005. From 1998 to May 2005, he served as Senior Vice President, Science and Technology, at United Technologies Corp. (“UTC”), a diversified company with extensive aerospace operations. He previously served as Vice President and Director of UTC’s Research Center from 1991 to 1998, and as Director of Technology Management from 1989 to 1991. He also served at the General Electric Corporate Research and Development Laboratories from 1981 to 1988. Dr. Cassidy’s extensive background in research and development, program management, and product development are valuable attributes for oversight of the Company’s research and development operations as well as its Albany Engineered Composites segment, which seeks to grow as a key supplier to customers in the aerospace industry. Age 75.


2 


JOHN R. SCANNELL has been a Director of the Company since February 2012. He has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Moog Inc., a worldwide designer, manufacturer, and integrator of high-performance precision motion and fluid control systems for a broad range of applications, since January 2014. Mr. Scannell joined Moog in 1990 as an Engineering Manager of Moog Ireland and later became Operations Manager of Moog GmbH in Germany. In 1999, he became the General Manager of Moog Ireland, and in 2003 moved to the Aircraft Group in East Aurora, New York, as the Boeing 787 Program Manager. He was named Moog’s Director of Contracts and Pricing in 2005. Mr. Scannell was elected Vice President of Moog in 2005 and Chief Financial Officer in 2007, a position he held until December 2010, at which time he was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer. In December 2011, he was named Moog’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Scannell also serves on the Board of M&T Bank. Mr. Scannell’s range of management experience in engineering, operations management, contracts, and finance, along with his in-depth knowledge of aerospace markets, products, and technologies, make him highly qualified to serve as a Director. In addition to an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, Mr. Scannell holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from University College Cork, Ireland. Age 55.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                         Page
Corporate Governance5
              Board Leadership Structure5
              Role of the Board of Directors5
              Risk Oversight5
              Director Independence5
              Meeting Attendance6
              Non-Management Directors6
              Board Committees6
ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS8
Director Compensation11
Audit Committee Report13
ITEM 2 – RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS14
Other Audit Committee Matters15
Certain Business Relationships and Related Party Transactions15
Compensation Committee Report16
Compensation Discussion and Analysis16
            Executive Summary16
            Part I16
            Compensation Philosophy and Objectives16
            Shareholder “Say on Pay” Results and Response17
            Roles in Structuring Compensation17
            Elements of Compensation18
            Structuring the 2020 Compensation Program - Pay for Performance20
            2020 NEO Compensation Opportunities20
            Other Compensation Policies and Considerations21
            Part II23
            2020 Executive Compensation Earned23
            Performance Award Metrics and Goals23
            Achievement of Goals and Awards Earned25
            Part III26
            Required Compensation Tables26
            Description of Equity Awards32
            Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control36
ITEM 3 – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION38
Other Information39
            Share Ownership39
            5% Beneficial Owners of Class A Common Stock40
            5% Beneficial Ownership of Class B Common Stock41
            Voting Power of the Standish Family41
4


KATHARINE L. PLOURDE has been a Director of the Company since May 2013. She was a principal and analyst at the investment banking firm of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. (“DLJ”) until November 1997. Since that time, she has engaged in private investing. She previously served as a director of Pall Corporation, a global provider of filtration, separation and purification products and systems, from 1995 until its acquisition by Danaher Corporation in 2015, and of OM Group Inc. (OMG), a provider of specialty chemicals, advanced materials and technologies, from 2002 until OMG was acquired by Apollo Global Management in 2015. She also previously served as lead independent director of OMG and on the audit committees of OMG and Pall. She has also served on the board of directors of Evercore Equity Fund, a publicly traded mutual fund, since November 2014. Ms. Plourde brings significant analytical and financial expertise to the Board in a number of critical areas, including investor relations, financial reporting, accounting, corporate finance, and capital markets. Ms. Plourde’s years of service on the nominating/governance committees at Pall and OM Group have also given her significant Board governance experience, and contributed to her expertise on governance issues generally. Age 67.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

A. WILLIAM HIGGINS has been a Director of the Company since September 2016, and Chairman of the Board since February 2019. Mr. Higgins currently serves as a director of Kaman Corporation, a diversified aerospace and industrial distribution company, where he is chairman of the finance committee and a member of the corporate governance committee, and Bristow Group Inc., a global industrial aviation services provider, where he serves on the audit and governance/nominating committees. He served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of CIRCOR International, Inc. from 2008 to 2012. Prior to March 2008, Higgins held the offices of President and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of CIRCOR. Prior to joining CIRCOR in 2005, he spent thirteen years in a variety of senior management positions with Honeywell International and AlliedSignal. Leslie Controls, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CIRCOR and an entity for which Mr. Higgins served as a director and Vice President, filed a pre-negotiatedChapter 11reorganization in July 2010 to resolve asbestos liability claims. The subsidiary successfully emerged from bankruptcy the following year. Mr. Higgins’s professional background as a chief operating officer, president, chief executive officer and chairman of a public company, as well as his prior experience at Honeywell and Allied Signal, provides the Board with additional valuable perspective on talent development, international operations and global strategic development, lean manufacturing and continuous improvement processes, and the aerospace and defense industries. Age 60.


3 


KENNETH W. KRUEGER has been a Director of the Company since December 2016. Mr. Krueger currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Manitowoc Company, Inc. He has been a member of the Manitowoc Board of Directors since 2004. From October 2015 until March 2016, he also served as Manitowoc’s interim President and CEO. Mr. Krueger served as Chief Operating Officer of Bucyrus International, Inc., a global manufacturer of mining equipment, from 2006 to 2009, having previously served as Executive Vice President from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Krueger also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A.O. Smith Corp., a global manufacturer of water heating and treatment systems, from 2000 to 2005, and as Vice President, Finance and Planning for the Hydraulics, Semiconductor and Specialty Controls business segment of Eaton Corporation in 1999 and 2000. Mr. Krueger has served as a director of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. since 2012, where he is currently chair of the audit committee and also serves on the compensation and nominating and governance committees. Mr. Krueger’s contributions to the Company’s Board include his experience as a chief operating officer, chief executive officer and chairman of a public company, his board experience at other public companies, and his prior treasury and financial reporting experience. Age 62.



OLIVIER M. JARRAULT has been a Director of the Company, as well as the Company’s President and CEO, since March 2, 2018. From 2001 until 2016, Mr. Jarrault served as an Executive Vice President and Group President for Alcoa Engineered Products and Solutions (“EPS”), leading a portfolio of global advanced-technology components manufacturing businesses serving a number of markets, including aerospace, industrial gas turbines, commercial transportation, and building and construction. Prior to being named President of EPS, Mr. Jarrault served in a number of senior management positions at Alcoa — including as Chief Operating Officer of EPS from 2010 until 2011 and President of Alcoa Fastening Systems from 2002 until 2010 — as well as at Fairchild Fasteners and LISI Aerospace. Mr. Jarrault’s experience leading a diverse portfolio of manufacturing businesses across a broad and diverse market spectrum; his talent for organizational leadership; and his particular experience in aerospace, leading a global Tier 1 aerospace supplier through a period of significant growth, both organically and through acquisition, make him well-suited to lead the Company through its next stages of growth and maturity, and a valuable member of the Board. Age 57.



LEE C. WORTHAM has been a Director of the Company since May 2018. He has been a partner and COO at Barrantys LLC, a consultant and service provider to wealthy families and family offices, since 2007. In this capacity, he has been an adviser to the Standish family for many years, and is a director and executive officer of the J.S. Standish Company. From 2005 to 2007, he served as Executive Vice President at First Niagara Financial Group, Inc., where his responsibilities included wealth management, risk management, and corporate marketing, and from 1999 to 2005 he was Executive Vice President of Global Private Client Services, Product Development, and Central Operations at The Bank of New York. Mr. Wortham held several positions at Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Bank (currently JP Morgan Chase & Co.) from 1985 to 1999, including leading the Global Private Bank’s activities in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa while based in London, England. He started his career at M&T Bank in retail banking from 1980 to 1985. Mr. Wortham has been a director of Evans Bancorp, Inc., since 2011, and currently serves as Chairman. Mr. Wortham’s extensive experience in the financial services industry makes him a valuable member of our Board; as a long-time advisor to the Standish family, and director and executive officer of the J.S. Standish Company, his membership also maintains the continuity of the Company’s relationship with the Standish family, the Company’s controlling shareholder, following the retirement of John C. Standish in 2018. Age 61.


4 


MARK J. MUPRHY is the Chief Financial Officer of Qorvo, Inc., (NASDAQ: QRVO), a leading provider of radio frequency solutions for mobile devices, wireless infrastructure, aerospace and defense, internet of things, and other markets. Mr. Murphy joined Qorvo as CFO in June 2016 and is responsible for finance, information technology, and procurement. He was previously executive vice president and CFO of Delphi Automotive, PLC, a supplier of advanced technologies to the automotive industry. Mr. Murphy joined Delphi from Praxair, Inc., a global industrial gas supplier, where he was president of the U.S. Industrial Gases business, and before that, president of Praxair’s Surface Technologies and Electronic Materials division. He previously served as senior vice president and CFO of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., corporate controller of Praxair, president of Praxair’s Electronics division and vice president of finance for Praxair Asia based in Shanghai. Mr. Murphy’s experience as a CFO and general manager in high technology industrial businesses, including those serving aerospace and advanced materials markets, and his extensive experience working in Asia and Europe make him qualified to serve as a director. Age 51.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR”
ALL OF THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION

5 


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Leadership Structure.Since becoming a public company in 1984, the Company has at times operated under a board leadership structure with the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Board Chairman combined, while at other times the positions of the Chairman and the top executive officer have been separated. At certain times during whichwhen the Chief Executive Officer also served as Chairman, a non-management Board member has served as Lead Director. A non-management independent Board member has served as Board Chairman since 2008.


The Board of Directors expects the Chairman of the Board to function as a liaison and independent conduit between the members of the Board and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer between meetings of the Board, and to preside over meetings of, and provide leadership to, the non-management members of the Board. The Chairman is also primarily responsible for setting Board meeting agendas, in cooperation with the Chief Executive Officer and Secretary. (OtherOther responsibilities of the Chairman are described in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The(The Chairman is also empowered to delegate some of these duties, in his or her discretion, to a Vice Chairman. There is currently no Vice Chairman of the Board.) The Board has found that having a non-management director function in this role, whether as a “lead director” or as Chairman, facilitates communication, helps ensure that issues of concern to non-management directors are given an opportunity for discussion at meetings and contributes generally to a more effective use of management and Board time. The Board also believes the current board leadership structure has served the Company well, allowing the Chief Executive Officer to devote his attention to the management of the Company during what has been a challenging and dynamic period. The Board engages in an annual self-evaluation process to determine whether the Board is discharging its responsibilities and operating effectively, and to consider changes in membership, structure, or process that could improve performance. While we believe that the current Board leadership structure is appropriate, it is possible that alternative Board leadership structures, including those that combine the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, could be appropriate for the Company under different circumstances.


Role of the Board of Directors.The Board is responsible for exercising oversight over the Chief Executive Officer and other senior Company management, who are charged with the competent and ethical operation of the Company on a day-to-day basis. Through oversight, review, and counsel, the Board establishes and promotes the Company’s business and organizational objectives and assures that the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders are being served.

Risk Oversight.The Board of Directors oversees the Company’s risk management processes. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer review with the Board, at each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting, the most significant top-level enterprise risks facing the Company, and the processes by which the Company mitigates such risks. This review is supported by periodic (but no less than quarterly) formal reviews by senior management of all significant enterprise risks, facilitated by the Chief Financial Officer. The Board requests that management, from time to time, supplement these quarterly reviews with a more detailed analysis of one or more specific risks, selected by the Board, including related mitigation actions. The Board also reviews management’s annual operating plan and strategic plan to ensure that they are consistent with, and appropriately address, the Company’s risks and risk management processes. The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in its oversight of the Company’s risk management processes. The Audit Committee periodically reviews the adequacy of the processes by which the Company handles risk assessment and risk management, and discusses such processes with management, the Company’s internal audit function and the independent auditor. The Committee receives periodic reports from the Company’s finance department regarding liquidity and other financial risks; from the finance and internal audit function regarding internal control risks; and from the finance, legal, and internal audit departments regarding processes for addressing fraud, legal and compliance risks, and the adequacy of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Each year, the Committee also reviews the results of management’s annual fraud risk assessment. It also regularly reviews and discusses cyber-security risks to the Company with the Company’s Chief Information Officer and the internal audit function, and reviews and discusses with senior management the risk factors disclosed by the Company in its periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) before such filings are made. Each year, the Compensation Committee assesses compensation-related risks to the Company.


Although the Board oversees the Company’s risk management, day-to-day management of risk remains the responsibility of management.


Director Independence.The Corporate Governance Rulescorporate governance standards of the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE (“NYSE Standards”) require that a majority of our Board consist of independent directors. In general, the NYSE Rules”) provideStandards require that an independent director must have no material relationship with the Company, except as a company of which more than 50%director.

Our Board reviews any business transactions and charitable relationships between the Company and each director to determine whether any such material relationship exists, and to evaluate whether there are any other facts or circumstances that might impact a determination of the voting power is held by an individual, a group, or another company will be considered to be a “controlled company.” Asindependence of March 18, 2019, the J. S. Standish Company, directly or indirectly, held votingsuch director.

5

Based on its review, our Board has determined that all Board members, other than President and investment control of shares entitling it to cast approximately 53% of the combined votes entitled to be cast by all stockholders of the Company. Directors Christine Standish and Lee Wortham (the “Standish Directors”)CEO A. William Higgins, are executive officers and board members of J. S. Standish Company. As a controlled companyindependent under the NYSE Rules, the CompanyStandards. Our Board has electedappointed only independent directors to avail itself of the provisions of the NYSE Rules exempting a controlled company from certain requirements of the NYSE Rules, including those that require

6 

theour Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance Committees to be composed entirely of independent directors (asCommittee in accordance with the independence is defined by therequirements set forth in NYSE Rules). Standards.


The Board of Directors has also determined however, that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent.independent under the separate independence standards set forth in SEC Rule 10A-3. The Board is not required to make this determination with respect to any other director, and it has not done so. A description of transactions, relationships, or arrangements (if any) considered by the Board in making these determinations is set forth in the Audit Committee discussion below.


Meeting Attendance.The Board of Directors met tennine times in 2018.2020. Each incumbent director attended (in person or by telephone) 75% or more100% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which he or she served. It is the policy of the Company that all persons who are candidates for election to the Board of Directors at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders should attend that meeting (either in person or, if necessary, by telephone).meeting. All of the candidates for election to the Board of Directors who were also candidates in 20182020 attended the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Stockholders, albeit virtually.


Non-management directors. Meetings of the “non-management” directors, as defined by the NYSE Standards, are regularly held at the conclusion of each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The current non-management directors are all of the directors other than Mr. Higgins. Meetings of the non-management directors during 2020 were chaired by the Chairman. The Chairman also acts as a liaison between the directors and the Chief Executive Officer and facilitates communication among the directors. Interested persons may communicate with the Chairman and the non-management directors by writing to: Chairman, Albany International Corp., 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867.

Board Committees.The Board assigns responsibilities and delegates authority to its committees, which regularly report on their activities and actions to the Board. The Board has determined that each current member of each committee is “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE Standards and our Corporate Guidelines and meets any applicable additional committee-specific independence requirements. The standing committees of the Board of Directors are the Governance Committee, the Audit Committee, and the Compensation Committee. During 2018, the Governance Committee met eight times, the Audit Committee met nine times,The purpose and the Compensation Committee met seven times.

Governance Committee.The Governance Committee reviewsprincipal responsibilities of each committee are summarized below and recommends changes to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and governance and management structure; evaluates the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, its committees, and the directors; recommends to the Board of Directors the persons toset forth in more detail in each committee’s written charter, which can be nominated for election as directors; and reviews management succession planning. A copy of the Charter of the Governance Committee is available atfound in the Corporate Governance section of our website (www.albint.com).


Governance Committee
Purpose: to provide leadership to the Board in the development and maintenance of an effective corporate governance structure and process.

Members:
Katharine L. Plourde, Chair
Christine L. Standish
John F. Cassidy, Jr
Kenneth W. Krueger

Principal Responsibilities:
•reviews and recommends changes to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and governance and management structure;
•evaluates the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, its committees, and the directors;
•recommends to the Board of Directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors; and
•reviews management succession planning.
Meetings in 2020: 6
Attendance: 100%

6

Audit Committee
Purpose: to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in a number of key areas, including:
• the integrity of our financial statements, financial reporting process, and internal controls;
• the performance of our internal audit function;
• our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including our disclosure controls and procedures; and
• the annual independent audit of our financial statements, including the engagement of the independent auditor, and the evaluation of the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance.
Members:
Kenneth W. Krueger, Chair
Erland E. Kailbourne
Katharine L. Plourde
Mark J. Murphy
Principal Responsibilities:
•reviewing and discussing with management each quarterly earnings release, as well as other financial communications, and all quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or annual reports on Form 10-K;
•after the completion of each annual audit, and before the filing of the Form 10-K, reviewing and discussing with the independent auditors, the head of internal audit, and senior management, among other things: (1) any significant audit findings, and management’s responses to such findings, (2) any significant changes in audit scope, and (3) any difficulties encountered during the course of the audit;
•periodically reviewing and discussing with the independent auditor, management, and the head of the internal audit function, the acceptability and quality of our accounting policies, the clarity of our financial disclosures, and any weaknesses in our system of internal controls; and
•periodically reviewing, evaluating and discussing with management the qualifications, performance and depth of the Company’s financial personnel.
Meetings in 2020: 11
Attendance: 100%

The Board of Directors has determined that none of the members of the Audit Committee has any relationship with the Company that impairs his or her independence, or that would preclude a determination of independence, and, on that basis, has determined that each of them is independent under the NYSE Standards as well as the additional requirements of SEC Rule 10A-3. In making this determination, the Board considered, after due inquiry, the lack of any transactions, relationships, or arrangements between the Company and each member of the Committee. The Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is a “financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 401 of Regulation SK of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Board of Directors believes that each of the current members of our Governancethe Audit Committee are Katharine L. Plourde, John F. Cassidy, Jr. (Chair) and Christine L. Standish. Board Chair Erland E. Kailbourne also participates in Committee meetings as anex officiononvoting member. Directors Plourde, Cassidy and Standish each served onis well qualified to perform the functions for which the Committee is responsible.

Compensation Committee
Purpose: generally responsible for determining the compensation of the Company’s Directors, Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers of the Company.
Members:
John F. Cassidy, Jr., Chair
John R. Scannell
Lee C. Wortham
J. Michael McQuade
Principal Responsibilities:
•assists the Board of Directors in the creation and implementation of employee compensation, incentive, and benefit policies and plans;
•administer (or oversees the administration by management of) pension and other employee benefit plans;
•approve grants and awards under our incentive plans; and
•oversee the compliance of such programs and policies with applicable legal requirements.
Meetings in 2020: 5
Attendance: 100%

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. No member of the Compensation Committee was an employee during all2020. Lee C. Wortham is an officer and director of 2018.

J. S. Standish Co. (See “SHARE OWNERSHIP” on page 39.)




7

ITEM 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Governance Committee considers, on an ongoing basis, the skills, background, and experience that should be represented on the Board of Directors and its committees, the performance of incumbent directors, the appropriate size of the Board of Directors, potential vacancies on the Board, and other factors relating to the efficacy of the Board. The Committee and the Board seek to maintain a group of Board members that, in the aggregate, possesses the skills, background, and experience necessary and desirable to address effectively the issues and challenges the Company will confront. The Board does not expect that any single member will possess all of these attributes, and therefore seeks to accomplish this by selecting candidates with diverse skills and backgrounds. The Committee discusses with the Board, at least annually, the various qualifications and skills that should be represented on the Board and its committees, taking into account the nature of the business and the objectives of the Company as they may evolve over time. The Committee also reviews, on an annual basis, the performance of the sitting members of the Board, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding those directors to be nominated for reelection by the stockholders.


The Governance Committee employs professional consultants for this purpose, and members of the Committee also communicate with knowledgeable persons on a continuing basis to identify potential candidates for Board membership. Any qualified potential candidates so identified are then discussed by the Committee and the Board, and if the potential candidate appears likely to be a substantial addition to the Board, he or she is then interviewed by members of the Committee and the Board. The Governance Committee then considers the reports of the interviews and other information that has been gathered and determines whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that the person be elected as a director. The Committee has retained the director search firm of G. Fleck/Board Services since 2011 to assist in identifying and evaluating potential Board members. Directors Scannell, Plourde, Higgins, and Krueger and Director nominee Murphy were each initially recommended to the Committee by G. Fleck/Board Services.

Director McQuade was identified and recommended by a member of the Board of Directors but was evaluated with the assistance of G. Fleck/Board Services.


Stockholders may send recommendations of persons to be considered by the Governance Committee for nomination for election as directors to: Chair, Governance Committee, Albany International Corp., 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a copy of which is available at the Corporate Governance section of our website (www.albint.com), set forth criteria to be employed by the Governance Committee and the Board of Directors in determining whether a person is qualified to serve as a director of the Company. Recommendations by stockholders should include information relevant to these criteria. The Governance Committee will give consideration to persons recommended by stockholders in the same manner that it employs when considering recommendations from other sources.

7 


All of the nominees with exception of Mr. Murphy, for election as directors at the 20192021 Annual Meeting are current Board members standing for election or reelection by the stockholders.


All of the members of the Board of Directors are elected annually to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Pursuant to our By Laws, the Board of Directors may increase or decrease the number of directors from time to time, but not to fewer than three. After 15 years of service to the Company, director John F. Cassidy, Jr. has informed the Board of Directors of his desire to retire and that he has chosen no to stand for re-election.The Board of Directors has determined that, until further action by the Board, the number of directors of the Company, from and after the time of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall be nine. Accordingly, the number of directors to be elected at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is nine. The Board of Directors has nominated for election the nine persons listed below. All of the nominees are currently serving as directors. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy, the shares represented by a proxy in the accompanying form will be voted for the election of the nine persons listed below. If, at the time of the meeting, any nominee is unable, or for good cause unwilling, to serve, which event is not anticipated, the shares will be voted for a substitute nominee proposed by the Board of Directors, unless the Board reduces the number of directors. The biographical sketches of each nominee below highlight some of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that contributed to his or her selection by the Board.

CHRISTINE L. STANDISH has been a Director of the Company since 1997. She is a director and executive officer of J. S. Standish Company. J. S. Standish Company and related persons hold in the aggregate shares entitling them to cast a significant percentage of the combined votes entitled to be cast by all stockholders of the Company. As the Board seeks to safeguard and promote the interests of the Company’s stockholders, oversee Company management, and otherwise discharge its fiduciary obligations, Ms. Standish is able to provide a direct perspective as the representative of one of the Company’s largest stockholder groups. Age 55.
8

ERLAND E. KAILBOURNE has been a Director of the Company since 1999 and Chairman of the Board since January 2020. He previously served as Chairman from May 2008 until February 2019. He retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (New York Region) of Fleet National Bank, a banking subsidiary of Fleet Financial Group, Inc., in 1998. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fleet Bank, also a banking subsidiary of Fleet Financial Group, Inc., from 1993 until its merger into Fleet National Bank in 1997, and also served as Vice Chairman of the State University of New York (SUNY) from 1995 until 1999. He is Chairman of the Board of Rand Capital Corporation, and a director of the two insurance companies that comprise the Allegany Insurance Group, as well as director of Rev LNG Holdings, LLC and Rev LNG, LLC. Mr. Kailbourne’s broad experience as a director on numerous boards of public and private companies and foundations, his 38 years of experience in banking and finance, and his operational experience as chief executive officer of large organizations make him a valuable addition to the board of any public or private company, especially in oversight of risk management, liquidity, and finance matters. Age 79.
JOHN R. SCANNELL has been a Director of the Company since February 2012. He has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Moog Inc., a worldwide designer, manufacturer, and integrator of high-performance precision motion and fluid control systems for a broad range of applications, since January 2014. Mr. Scannell joined Moog in 1990 as an Engineering Manager of Moog Ireland and later became Operations Manager of Moog GmbH in Germany. In 1999, he became the General Manager of Moog Ireland, and in 2003 moved to the Aircraft Group in East Aurora, New York, as the Boeing 787 Program Manager. He was named Moog’s Director of Contracts and Pricing in 2005. Mr. Scannell was elected Vice President of Moog in 2005 and Chief Financial Officer in 2007, a position he held until December 2010, at which time he was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer. In December 2011, he was named Moog’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Scannell also serves on the Board of M&T Bank. Mr. Scannell’s range of management experience in engineering, operations management, contracts, and finance, along with his in-depth knowledge of aerospace markets, products, and technologies, make him highly qualified to serve as a Director. In addition to an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, Mr. Scannell holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from University College Cork, Ireland. Age 57.
KATHARINE L. PLOURDE has been a Director of the Company since May 2013. She was a principal and analyst at the investment banking firm of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. (“DLJ”) until November 1997. Since that time, she has engaged in private investing. She previously served as a director of Pall Corporation, a global provider of filtration, separation and purification products and systems, from 1995 until its acquisition by Danaher Corporation in 2015, and of OM Group Inc. (OMG), a provider of specialty chemicals, advanced materials and technologies, from 2002 until OMG was acquired by Apollo Global Management in 2015. She also previously served as lead independent director of OMG and on the audit committees of OMG and Pall. She has also served on the board of directors of Evercore Equity Fund, a publicly traded mutual fund, since November 2014. Ms. Plourde brings significant analytical and financial expertise to the Board in a number of critical areas, including investor relations, financial reporting, accounting, corporate finance, and capital markets. Ms. Plourde’s years of service on the nominating/governance committees at Pall and OM Group have also given her significant Board governance experience and contributed to her expertise on governance issues generally. Age 69.
A. WILLIAM HIGGINS has been a Director of the Company since September 2016, and President and CEO since January 2020. He previously served as Chairman of the Board from February 2019 until January 2020. Mr. Higgins currently serves as a director of Kaman Corporation, a diversified aerospace and industrial distribution company, where he is a member of the finance and compensation committees. He previously served on the board of Bristow Group Inc., a global industrial aviation services provider, from 2016 until October 2019. (Bristow filed a pre-negotiated Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in May, 2019, from which it successfully emerged in October, 2019.) He served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of CIRCOR International, Inc. from 2008 to 2012. Prior to March 2008, Mr. Higgins held the offices of President and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of CIRCOR. Prior to joining CIRCOR in 2005, he spent thirteen years in a variety of senior management positions with Honeywell International and AlliedSignal. (Leslie Controls, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CIRCOR and an entity for which Mr. Higgins served as a director and Vice President, filed a pre-negotiated Chapter 11 reorganization in July 2010 to resolve asbestos liability claims. The subsidiary successfully emerged from bankruptcy the following year.) Mr. Higgins’s professional background as a chief operating officer, president, chief executive officer and chairman of a public company, as well as his prior experience at Honeywell and Allied Signal, provides the Board with additional valuable perspective on talent development, international operations and global strategic development, lean manufacturing and continuous improvement processes, and the aerospace and defense industries. Age 62.
9

KENNETH W. KRUEGER has been a Director of the Company since December 2016. Mr. Krueger currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Manitowoc Company, Inc. He has been a member of the Manitowoc Board of Directors since 2004. From October 2015 until March 2016, he also served as Manitowoc’s interim President and CEO. Mr. Krueger served as Chief Operating Officer of Bucyrus International, Inc., a global manufacturer of mining equipment, from 2006 to 2009, having previously served as Executive Vice President from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Krueger also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A.O. Smith Corp., a global manufacturer of water heating and treatment systems, from 2000 to 2005, and as Vice President, Finance and Planning for the Hydraulics, Semiconductor and Specialty Controls business segment of Eaton Corporation in 1999 and 2000. Mr. Krueger has served as a director of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. since 2012, where he is currently chair of the audit committee and also serves on the compensation and nominating and governance committees. Mr. Krueger’s contributions to the Company’s Board include his experience as a chief operating officer, chief executive officer and chairman of a public company, his board experience at other public companies, and his prior treasury and financial reporting experience. Age 64.
LEE C. WORTHAM has been a Director of the Company since May 2018. He has been a partner and COO at Barrantys LLC, a consultant and service provider to wealthy families and family offices, since 2007. In this capacity, he has been an adviser to the Standish family for many years, and is a director and executive officer of the J.S. Standish Company. From 2005 to 2007, he served as Executive Vice President at First Niagara Financial Group, Inc., where his responsibilities included wealth management, risk management, and corporate marketing, and from 1999 to 2005 he was Executive Vice President of Global Private Client Services at The Bank of New York. Mr. Wortham held several positions at Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Bank (currently JP Morgan Chase & Co.) from 1985 to 1999, including leading the Global Private Bank’s activities in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa while based in London, England. He started his career at M&T Bank in retail banking from 1980 to 1985. Mr. Wortham has been a director of Evans Bancorp, Inc., since 2011, and currently serves as Chairman. Mr. Wortham’s extensive experience in the financial services industry, and his knowledge of finance, governance and compensation and strategic planning, make him a valuable member of our Board. As a long-time advisor to the Standish family, and director and executive officer of the J.S. Standish Company, his membership also maintains the continuity of the Company’s relationship with the Standish family. Age 63.
MARK J. MUPRHY has been a director of the Company since May 2020. He is the Chief Financial Officer of Qorvo, Inc., (NASDAQ: QRVO), a leading provider of radio frequency solutions for mobile devices, wireless infrastructure, aerospace and defense, internet of things, and other markets. Mr. Murphy joined Qorvo as CFO in June 2016 and is responsible for finance, information technology, and strategic planning. He was previously executive vice president and CFO of Delphi Automotive, PLC, a supplier of advanced technologies to the automotive industry. Mr. Murphy joined Delphi from Praxair, Inc., a global industrial gas supplier, where he was president of the U.S. Industrial Gases business, and before that, president of Praxair’s Surface Technologies and Electronic Materials division. He previously served as senior vice president and CFO of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., corporate controller of Praxair, president of Praxair’s Electronics division and vice president of finance for Praxair Asia based in Shanghai. Mr. Murphy’s experience as a CFO and general manager in high technology businesses, including those serving aerospace and advanced materials markets, and his extensive experience working in Asia and Europe make him qualified to serve as a director. Age 53.
J. MICHAEL McQUADE has been a director of the Company since December 2020. He currently serves as Vice President for Research at Carnegie Mellon University, a private, global research university in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He also served on the Defense Innovation Board of the Unites States Department of Defense. From 2006 to 2018, he served as Senior Vice President, Science & Technology at United Technologies Company which, prior to its merger with Raytheon Technologies Company, was a diversified company with extensive aerospace operations. From 2002 to 2006, Dr. McQuade was Vice President of 3M Medical Business Unit and from 2000 to 2001 President, Kodak Health Imaging Business Unit and Senior Vice President, Eastman Kodak. Prior to 2000, Mr. McQuade held various technical and managerial positions at the health imagining businesses of Kodak, 3M Company and Imation. Dr. McQuade holds B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Carnegie Mellon University. His extensive background in research and development, program management, and innovation are valuable attributes for oversight of the Company’s research and development operations as well as its Albany Engineered Composites segment, which seeks to grow as a key supplier to customers in the aerospace industry. Age 65.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR”
ALL OF THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION
10

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

It is the goal of the Company to set directors’ fees at a competitive level that will enable the Company to attract and retain talented, well-qualified directors. Effective May 2020, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee (and with the approval of the Company’s stockholders for that portion which is paid in shares of Company Common Stock) and based on benchmark data provided by Pearl Meyer & Partners, approved the following compensation for directors:

•An annual cash retainer of $70,000;
•An additional annual cash retainer for the Chairman of the Board of $62,000;
•An additional annual cash retainer for the Vice Chairman of the Board of $35,000;
•An annual cash retainer for the Chairs of the Audit, Committee.Compensation, and Governance Committees of $22,000, $15,000, and $12,000, respectively;
•An annual cash retainer for the members of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees of $12,000, $7,500 and $7,000, respectively; and
•An annual equity grant, which will be paid 100% in the form of Class A Common Stock and will have a fair market value of $105,000 at the date of grant.

Directors serving for only a portion of the year receive a pro-rated portion of their applicable compensation. Cash retainer fees are paid in four equal quarterly installments; the annual equity grant is generally paid shortly after the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to each member who served on the Board during the year in which the meeting was held. A director whose final term ends at the Annual Meeting, or any director first elected at the Annual Meeting, receives one-half of the share retainer; directors elected otherwise than at an Annual Meeting receive a pro-rated portion of the equity grant at the time of appointment. Christine Standish, who holds shares well in excess of the Board’s share ownership guidelines, may elect to receive cash in lieu of the annual equity grant. Any director may also elect to receive all or any part of his or her annual cash retainer in shares of Class A Common Stock.

All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with such services. In addition, the Company provides travel and liability insurance to all directors.

Director Pension. Each person who was a member of the Board of Directors on January 12, 2005, who was elected as a director prior to August 9, 2000, and who is not eligible to receive a pension under any other Company retirement program is, following (i) the termination of his or her service as a director and (ii) the attainment by such director of the age of 65, entitled to receive an annual pension in the amount of $20,000, payable in quarterly installments until the earlier of (a) the expiration of a period equal to the number of full years that such person served as a director prior to May 31, 2001, or (b) the death of such person. Directors Christine Standish and Erland Kailbourne are the only current directors so eligible.

Share Ownership Guidelines. The purposeBoard has adopted share ownership guidelines for its members. Under these guidelines, directors are generally expected to retain ownership of shares of Common Stock awarded or acquired until an ownership equal to three (3) times the annual cash and stock retainer is attained. Each director either satisfies these guidelines, or, in the case of directors with relatively short tenures, are on pace to satisfy the guidelines.

Meeting and Other Fees. Since May 2018, Directors have not received any additional fees for attendance at meetings or for any other service.
11



Director Compensation
Name
Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards(1)
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
Total
($)
Christine L. Standish181,000———1,181 (2)—182,181
Erland E. Kailbourne97,044149,955——(1,489)(2)—245,510
John F. Cassidy, Jr.91,041104,959——— —196,000
John R. Scannell77,541104,959——— —182,500
Katherine L. Plourde94,541104,959——— —199,500
A. William Higgins5,84914,568——— —20,417
Kenneth W. Krueger89,541104,959——— —194,500
Lee C. Wortham77,541104,959——— —182,500
Mark J. Murphy36,045149,955——— —186,000
J. Michael McQuade1,92143,704——— —45,625
___________________________
(1)As these are payments of shares, and not stock “awards,” there are no amounts deemed “outstanding” at the end of 2020.
(2)Increase/(decrease) during 2020 in the actuarial present value of the director’s accumulated benefit under the director pension plan described in the narrative preceding this table.



12

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee has provided the following report:

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), the financial statements for 2020, including management’s report with respect to internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), and has received from KPMG the written disclosures and the communications relating to KPMG’s independence required by PCAOB rules. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG its independence, and has considered whether the provision by KPMG of the services referred to below under “RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS” is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.

Based on the foregoing discussions and review, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited statements for 2020 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2020 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The financial reporting process of the Company, including the system of internal controls and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, is the responsibility of the Company’s management. The Company’s independent auditors (KPMG) are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee monitors and reviews these processes. As required by the NYSE Standards, the Board of Directors has determined that, in their judgment, all of the members of the Audit Committee are “financial experts” as such term is defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are “financially literate” and have “accounting or related financial management expertise.” The members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company and do not represent themselves as experts in the field of accounting or auditing.


The Charter of the Audit Committee provides that the members of the Committee are entitled to rely, and they do rely, on advice, information, and representations that they receive from the independent auditors, management, and the head of the Company’s Internal Audit function. Accordingly, the review, discussions, and communications conducted by the Audit Committee do not assure that the financial statements of the Company are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, or that the Company’s independent auditors are, in fact, “independent.”
The Audit Committee:
Kenneth W. Krueger, Chair
Erland E. Kailbourne
Katharine L. Plourde
Mark J. Murphy
13

ITEM 2

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Audit Committee appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as auditors of the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, and to perform the reviews of the financial statements to be included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during that period.

As stated in the Audit Committee Report above, the Audit Committee has received the communications related to KPMG’s independence required by applicable PCAOB rules, has discussed with KPMG its independence, and has considered whether the provision of the services referred to below under “All Other Fees” is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG. In accordance with its charter, the Committee has also reviewed KPMG’s report describing (1) its internal quality-control procedures, (2) any material issues raised in any recent internal review, peer review, or review by any government or professional authorities (such as the PCAOB) of one or more independent audits conducted by KPMG, and (3) any steps taken by KPMG to deal with any issues raised in such reviews.

Although current law, rules, and regulations, as well as the charter of the Audit Committee, require the Audit Committee to appoint, terminate, oversee and evaluate the performance of the Company’s independent auditor, the Board considers the selection of the independent auditor to be an important matter of stockholder concern and is submitting the selection of KPMG for ratification by stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting by the shares present in person or by proxy is required to approve the ratification of the selection of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor. A representative from KPMG is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

The Audit Committee currently expects to take action during the second quarter of 2021 with respect to the appointment of auditors to audit the financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021, and may issue requests to KPMG and other audit firms for proposals, which the Committee will review before making any appointment. The Audit Committee also reserves the right to appoint, reappoint, retain, or replace our auditors at any time, even after an appointment has been ratified by the stockholders. The stockholder vote on this proposal is advisory and nonbinding, and serves only as a recommendation to the Board of Directors. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of our auditors, the Audit Committee will consider such voting results with respect to any appointment.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by or agreed to with KPMG for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q, and services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $2,998,300 in 2020 and $3,323,000 in 2019.

Audit-related Fees

The aggregate fees billed by KPMG for assurance or related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s annual financial statements, including benefit plans, were $133,500 in 2020 and $121,000 in 2019.

Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed by KPMG for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $133,500 in 2020 and $197,000 in 2019. Billings were primarily for assistance in the preparation of tax returns and filings, assistance in connection with tax audits, tax compliance advice in connection with corporate and business restructuring activities, and general tax advice.

All Other Fees

KPMG did not bill for any other products or services not described above in 2020 or 2019.

Preapproval Policy

It is the responsibility of the Company’s Audit Committee to approve all audit and nonaudit services to be performed by the independent auditors, such approval to take place in advance of such services when required by law, regulation, or rule.

The Chairman of the Audit Committee is permitted to assistpreapprove any engagement of the Boardindependent auditor for services that could be properly preapproved by the Committee, provided that the anticipated fees with respect to the services so preapproved do not exceed $100,000. The Chairman is required to report such preapprovals at the next regular meeting of Directors in fulfillingthe Committee.

14

The Audit Committee is required to preapprove each engagement of the independent auditor not preapproved by the Chairman of the Committee. Each such preapproval must describe the particular service to be rendered. No preapproval may be given for any service that would cause the independent auditor to be considered not independent under applicable laws and regulations, and the independent auditor is requested to confirm that such service will not compromise its oversight responsibilities in a numberindependence as part of key areas, including:

the integrity of our financial statements, financial reporting process, and internal controls;preapproval process.
the performance of our internal audit function;
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including our disclosure controls and procedures; and
the annual independent audit of our financial statements, includingWith respect to the engagement of the independent auditor to provide routine and the evaluationrecurring audit-related tax and other nonaudit services, preapproval of the independent auditor’s qualifications, independenceAudit Committee may take the form of approval of a schedule describing such services in reasonable detail and performance.

     The Committee’s charter sets forthspecifying an annual monetary limit. Each audit or nonaudit service (excluding tax services provided in the ordinary course) shall be reflected in a number of the Committee’s specific responsibilities in each of these areas.

     The Committee discharges its responsibilities related to financial reporting by, amongwritten engagement or other things:

reviewing and discussing with management each quarterly earnings release, as well as other financial communications, and all quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or annual reports on Form 10-K;
after the completion of each annual audit, and before the filing of the Form 10-K, reviewing and discussingwriting. In connection with the independent auditors, the headprovision of internal audit, and senior management, among other things: (1) any significant audit findings, and management’s responses to such findings, (2) any significant changes in audit scope, and (3) any difficulties encountered during the course of the audit;
periodically reviewing and discussing withpermitted tax services, the independent auditor management, and the headis required to, among other things, provide a written description of the internal audit function,services and discuss their impact on the acceptability and quality of our accounting policies, the clarity of our financial disclosures, and any weaknesses in our system of internal controls; andauditor’s independence.
periodically reviewing, evaluating and discussing with management the qualifications, performance and depth
None of the Company’s financial personnel.2019 or 2020 services described above was approved by the Audit Committee or its Chairman pursuant to 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C), which permits the waiver of preapproval requirements in connection with the provision of certain nonaudit services.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR”
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
KPMG LLP


Other Audit Committee Matters

As part of its oversight of our internal audit function, the Audit Committee reviews and approves the annual internal audit plan, and reviews, at least quarterly, the reports and findings of plan activities with the head of the department, senior management and the independent auditor. The Committee also evaluates the performance of the department at least annually, with input from management and the independent auditor.


The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of communications (including anonymous communications) relating to questionable accounting, auditing or internal control matters, violations of laws or regulations to which the Company is subject, or violations of the Company’s Business Ethics Policy or Code of Ethics for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Controller. Our Business Ethics Policy describes various means by which such communications may be reported (see “Available“Available Information” on page 10.41.) The Committee has direct access to any complaints made to the Company’s whistleblower hotline that relate to accounting, auditing, internal controls, or alleged violations of the Business Ethics Policy, and oversees the investigation and resolution of all such complaints by the Company’s legal department and compliance function. The Committee also serves as the Company’s “Qualified Legal Compliance Committee” pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and is responsible for the review and resolution of all reports of “material violations” subject to Section 307. The Committee is also charged with reviewing any complaints or concerns relating to accounting, auditing, or internal controls matters that are communicated to the Chair of the Committee pursuant to the Company’s “up-the-ladder” reporting process for responding to such communications. The Committee is also responsible for evaluating all related-party transactions, and for recommending to the Board whether any such transaction should be ratified or approved.


The Audit Committee is solely responsible, in accordance with the NYSE rules,Standards, for the appointment of our independent auditors. The Committee is also responsible for the evaluation of the independence, performance and qualifications of our independent auditors, and reviewing and approving their compensation. (See “RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS” on page 40.14.)

8 

     A copy of the current charter of the Audit Committee is available at the Corporate Governance section of our website (www.albint.com). The current members of the Audit Committee are Edgar G. Hotard, Erland E. Kailbourne, Katharine L. Plourde (Chair) and Kenneth W. Krueger. All of the current members served during all of 2018.

     The Audit Committee has provided the following report:

     The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), the financial statements for 2018, including management’s report with respect to internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), and has received from KPMG the written disclosures and the communications relating to KPMG’s independence required by PCAOB rules. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG its independence, and has considered whether the provision by KPMG of the services referred to below under“RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS”is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.

     Based on the foregoing discussions and review, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited statements for 2018 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     The financial reporting process of the Company, including the system of internal controls and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, is the responsibility of the Company’s management. The Company’s independent auditors (KPMG) are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee monitors and reviews these processes. As required by the NYSE Rules, the Board of Directors has determined that, in their judgment, all of the members of the Audit Committee are “financial experts” as such term is defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are “financially literate” and have “accounting or related financial management expertise” as required by NYSE rules. The members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company and do not represent themselves as experts in the field of accounting or auditing.

     The Charter of the Audit Committee provides that the members of the Committee are entitled to rely, and they do rely, on advice, information, and representations that they receive from the independent auditors, management, and the head of the Company’s Internal Audit function. Accordingly, the review, discussions, and communications conducted by the Audit Committee do not assure that the financial statements of the Company are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, or that the Company’s independent auditors are, in fact, “independent.”

The Audit Committee:

Katharine L. Plourde,Chair
Erland E. Kailbourne
Edgar G. Hotard
Kenneth W. Krueger

     The Board of Directors has determined that none of the members of the Audit Committee has any relationship with the Company that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independence from management and the Company and, on that basis, has determined that each of them is “independent” within the meaning of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the NYSE Rules. In making this determination, the Board considered, after due inquiry, the lack of any transactions, relationships, or arrangements between the Company and each member of the Committee.

     The Board of Directors believes that all of the current members of the Audit Committee are well qualified to perform the functions for which the Committee is responsible.

Compensation Committee.The Compensation Committee is generally responsible for determining the compensation of our directors and executive officers. A copy of the Committee’s charter is available at the Corporate Governance section of our website (www.albint.com). The current members of the Compensation Committee are A. William Higgins (Chair), John F. Cassidy, Jr., John Scannell and Lee Wortham.

9 

     As specified in its charter, the Compensation Committee is directly responsible for determining the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer as well as the other senior executive officers of the Company. The Committee also assists the Board of Directors in the creation and implementation of employee compensation, incentive, and benefit policies and plans; administers (or oversees the administration by management of) pension and other employee benefit plans; and approves grants and awards under our incentive plans (except for awards intended to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which awards are approved by a separate committee of independent directors designated for such purpose). These duties and responsibilities may be delegated to a subcommittee comprising one or more members of the Committee.

     The Committee’s charter indicates that input from management is both expected and in some instances required in connection with the Committee’s exercise of its responsibilities. See “The Role of Executive Officers” on page 15.

     In addition, the Committee’s charter charges the Committee with the responsibility to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal or other advisers or consultants as the Committee may from time to time deem appropriate, and to determine the compensation and other terms of service of such advisers and consultants. The Committee has exclusive power to select, retain, and terminate the services of any such advisers or consultants to assist in evaluating the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer or senior executives, and sole power to determine the compensation and other terms of service of such consultants. The charter provides that the Company shall provide for the payment of fees and compensation to any advisers or consultants so employed by the Committee. The Company paid $44,845 to Pearl Meyer & Partners for all compensation-related services provided during 2018, including services related to the 2018 compensation program described in this Proxy Statement. (See “The Role of Compensation Consultant” on page 15 for a discussion of compensation-related services provided by Pearl Meyer for 2018.)

     The Compensation Committee has provided the following report:

     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed with management of the Company the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this proxy statement. Based on such review, the Committee has approved it, and has recommended to the Board of Directors that it be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and this proxy statement.

A. William Higgins,Chair
John Scannell
John F. Cassidy, Jr.
Lee C. Wortham

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.All of the current members of the Compensation Committee served on the Committee during all of 2018, except for Lee C. Wortham, who joined in May 2018.

     No member of the Committee was an employee during 2018. Lee C. Wortham is an officer and director of J. S. Standish Co. (See “SHARE OWNERSHIP” on page 12.)

     Nonmanagement directors.Meetings of the “nonmanagement” directors, as defined by the NYSE Rules, are regularly held at the conclusion of each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The current nonmanagement directors are all of the directors other than Mr. Jarrault. Meetings of the nonmanagement directors during 2018 were chaired by the Chairman. The Chairman also acts as a liaison between the directors and the Chief Executive Officer, and facilitates communication among the directors. Interested persons may communicate with the Chairman and the nonmanagement directors by writing to: Chairman, Albany International Corp., 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867.

Shareholder communications.It is our policy to forward to each member of the Board of Directors any communications addressed to the Board of Directors as a group, and to forward to each director any communication addressed specifically to such director. Such communications may be sent to: Albany International Corp., 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867.

Available Information.The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Business Ethics Policy, and Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller, and the charters of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees of the Board of Directors are all available at the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website (www.albint.com).

10 


Certain Business Relationships and Related Person Transactions


The Company has adopted a written policy requiring review of relationships and transactions in which directors or executive officers, or members of their immediate families, are participants, in order to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. The Company’s Legal Department is responsible for developing and implementing processes and controls designed to obtain information relating to any such relationship or transaction, and for determining whether disclosure of such relationships or transactions is required. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing such information and making recommendations to the disinterested members of the Board regarding the ratification or approval of such relationships or transactions. As set forth in the policy, the Audit Committee considers each transaction in light of relevant factors, including any benefits to the Company, whether the terms are arm’s-length and in the ordinary course, the direct or indirect nature of the related person’s interest in
15

the transaction, the size and expected term of the transaction, and such other facts and circumstances as may bear on the materiality of the transaction or relationship. No director may participate in the review, ratification, or approval of any transaction in which such director has an interest.


Since January 1, 2018,2020, there have been no transactions involving related persons required to be reported in this proxy statement where the above policy did not require review, approval, or ratification, or where such policy was not followed.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

     Section 16(a)




COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has provided the following report:

The Compensation Committee of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and any persons holding more than 10%Board of our Class A Common Stock, to fileDirectors has reviewed with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports disclosing their initial ownershipmanagement of the Company’s equity securities, as well as subsequent reports disclosing changesCompany the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this proxy statement. Based on such ownership. Toreview, the Committee has approved it, and has recommended to the Board of Directors that it be included in the Company’s knowledge, based solelyAnnual Report on a review of such reports furnished to usForm 10-K and written representations by such persons that no other reports were required, all persons who were subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) complied with such requirements during the year ended December 31, 2018.

11 

this proxy statement.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

     As of the close of business on March 1, 2019, each of the directors, director nominees, and Named Executive Officers, and all current directors and officers as a group, beneficially owned shares of our capital stock as follows:

  Shares of
Class A
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned(a)		 Percent of
Outstanding
Class A
Common Stock		 Shares of
Class B
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned		 Percent of
Outstanding
Class B
Common Stock
Christine L. Standish  3,239,702(b)  10.03%  3,232,744(c)  99.96%
Erland E. Kailbourne  37,132   (d)   —   — 
John F. Cassidy, Jr.  20,335   (d)   —   — 
Edgar G. Hotard  21,414   (d)   —   — 
John B. Scannell  12,204   (d)   —   — 
Katharine L. Plourde  8,646   (d)   —   — 
A. William Higgins  5,268   (d)   —   — 
Kenneth W. Krueger  3,436   (d)   —   — 
John B. Cozzolino  51,491(e)  (d)   —   — 
Daniel Halftermeyer  88,274   (d)   —   — 
Robert A. Hansen  20,407(f)  (d)   —   — 
Charles J. Silva  3,449(g)  (d)   —   — 
Oliver Jarrault  —   (d)   —   — 
Lee C. Wortham  1,118   (d)   —   — 
Mark J. Murphy  —   (d)   —   — 
Joseph G. Morone  12,239   (d)   —   — 
All officers and directors as a group                
(19 persons)  3,549,609   10.99%  3,232,744   99.96%

(a)Because shares of Class B Common Stock are convertible at any time into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, they are reflected in the above table both as Class B shares beneficially owned and as Class A shares beneficially owned. “Beneficial ownership” has the meaning specified under Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act.
(b)Includes (i) 6,595 shares owned directly, (ii) 3,232,744 shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock, and (iii) 363 shares held by Ms. Standish in her account in the Company’s 401(k) retirement savings and employee stock ownership plans. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” on page 14 for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of the Class B shares.
(c)Includes (i) 100 shares owned directly and (ii) 3,232,644 shares owned or controlled by J. S. Standish Company. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” on page 14 for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares.
John F. Cassidy, Jr., Chair
(d)Ownership is less than 1%.John Scannell
(e)Includes (i) 48,297 shares owned directly, (ii) 2,894 shares held in the Company’s employee stock ownership plan, and (iii) 300 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable currently.
Lee C. Wortham
J. Michael McQuade
(f)Includes (i) 13,404 shares owned directly, (ii) 4,753 shares held in the Company’s employee stock ownership plan, and (iii) 2,250 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable currently.
(g)Shares held in the Company’s employee stock ownership plan.

     Each of the individuals named in the preceding table has sole voting and investment power over shares listed as beneficially owned, except as indicated. Each of the directors and officers whose share ownership is reported above has indicated that no such shares are pledged as security.

12 

     The following persons have informed us that they were the beneficial owners of more than five percent of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock:

5% Beneficial Owners of Class A Common Stock

Name(s)(a) Reported Shares of
Company’s Class A
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned*		 Percent of
Outstanding
Class A
Common Stock
J. S. Standish Company  3,232,644(b)  10.01%
John C. Standish  3,233,357(c)  10.01%
Christine L. Standish  3,239,702(d)  10.03%
Standish Family Holdings, LLC  2,363,527(b)  7.52%
BlackRock, Inc.  4,124,702(e)  14.19%
Wellington Management Group LLP  1,501,000(f)  5.17%
The Vanguard Group  2,993,855(g)  10.30%
Brown Advisory Incorporated  1,496,929(h)  5.15%

*As of December 31, 2018, except for the J. S. Standish Company, John C. Standish, Christine L. Standish, and Standish Family Holdings, LLC, whose holdings are shown as of March 1, 2019.
(a)Addresses of the beneficial owners listed in the above table are as follows: Christine L. Standish, John C. Standish, J. S. Standish Company and Standish Family Holdings, LLC, c/o Barrantys LLC, 120 W. Tupper Street, Buffalo, New York 14201; BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022; Wellington Management Group LLP, c/o Wellington Management Company, LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210; The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355; and Brown Advisory Incorporated, 901 South Bond Street, Suite 400, Baltimore, MD 21231.
(b)Represents shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock” on page 14 below.
(c)Represents (i) 613 shares held by Mr. Standish directly or in his account in the Company’s 401(k) retirement savings and employee stock ownership plans, and (ii) 3,232,744 shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock” on page 14 for a description of the nature of Mr. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares.
(d)Represents (i) 6,958 shares held by Ms. Standish directly or in her account in the Company’s 401(k) retirement savings and employee stock ownership plans, and (ii) 3,232,744 shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock” on page 14 below for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares.
(e)Represents shares beneficially owned by BlackRock, Inc. and one or more affiliates, including BlackRock Fund Advisors. BlackRock, Inc. and/or one or more of such entities has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of 4,063,398 such shares, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all such shares.
(f)Represents shares beneficially owned by investment advisory clients of Wellington Management Group LLP or one of its affiliates. Wellington Management Group LLP has shared power to vote or direct the vote of 1,179,034 such shares, and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of all such shares.
(g)Represents shares reported as beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, in its capacity as investment adviser. The Vanguard Group has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 59,567 such shares, shared voting power as to 5,145 such shares, shared dispositive power with respect to 61,857 such shares, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 2,931,998 such shares.
(h)Represents shares beneficially owned by investment advisory clients of Brown Advisory Incorporated or its subsidiaries. Brown Advisory Incorporated or a subsidiary has sole voting power as to 1,488,842 such shares and shared dispositive power as to all such shares.

13 



     The following persons have informed the Company that they are the beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock as of March 1, 2019:

5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock

Name(s)(a) Shares of
Company’s Class B
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned		 Percent of
Outstanding
Class B
Common Stock
John C. Standish  3,232,744(b)  99.96%
Christine L. Standish  3,232,744(c)  99.96%
J. S. Standish Company  3,232,644(d)  99.96%
Standish Family Holdings, LLC  2,363,527   73.08%

(a)Addresses of the beneficial owners listed in the above table are as follows: John C. Standish, Christine L. Standish, J. S. Standish Company and Standish Family Holdings, LLC, c/o Barrantys LLC, 120 West Tupper Street, Buffalo, NY 14201.
(b)Includes (i) 2,363,527 shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC, and (ii) 869,117 shares held by J. S. Standish Company. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” below for a description of the nature of Mr. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 100 shares held directly.
(c)Includes (i) 2,363,527 shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC, and (ii) 869,117 shares held by J. S. Standish Company. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” below for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 100 shares held directly.
(d)Includes (i) 2,363,527 shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC, and (ii) 869,117 shares held directly. J. S. Standish Company, as manager, has sole voting and investment control over the shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC.

Voting Power of the Standish Family

     The J. S. Standish Company now holds or controls, in the aggregate, shares entitling it to cast approximately 53% of the combined votes entitled to be cast by all stockholders of the Company. Christine L. Standish and Lee C. Wortham each serve as officers and directors of the J. S. Standish Company.

     If the J. S. Standish Company casts votes as expected, election of the director nominees listed above, and approval of each other proposal to be considered at the meeting, will be assured.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary


This portion of our Proxy Statement describes the 20182020 executive compensation program and reports on the compensation earned by and paid to the Company’s “named executive officers” in 2018. Our “named2020. For 2020 our named executive officers”officers (or, “NEOs”), as that term is defined in applicable SEC regulations, were: former President and CEO Dr. Joseph G. Morone; current President and CEO Olivier Jarrault;A. William Higgins; Chief Financial Officer John B. Cozzolino;Stephen Nolan; President, — Machine Clothing Daniel A. Halftermeyer; SeniorPresident, Albany Engineered Composites Greg Harwell; and Executive Vice President, Human Resources Alice McCarvill. In addition, SEC regulations require us to include former President and Chief Technology Officer Robert Hansen;CEO Olivier Jarrault, even though he resigned and Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary Charles J. Silva, Jr. (Although Dr. Morone retired on March 2, 2018, he is still deemed an NEO for 2018 under applicable rules.)

     Theleft the Company early in the year.


Following the format of prior years, the discussion is presented in three parts. The first part sets forth the compensation philosophy and objectives of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), identifies the different elements of compensation, describes the structure of the 20182020 compensation program, and explains the various matters taken into consideration by the Committee when adopting compensation policies or making compensation decisions. The second part reports the compensation earned by our NEOs based on the Company’s 20182020 performance. The final part sets out the 20182020 compensation actually earned by, awarded to, or available to the NEOs in the tables prescribed by SEC rules.

14 



PART I


Compensation Philosophy and Objectives


The Committee’s compensation philosophy continuesis to be that we will compensate the Company’s executives based on their individual importance in achieving the Company’s strategic objectives, consistent with competitive market practices and taking internal equity into account.

The principal objectives of our executive compensation program are (1) to enableto:

Ø Enable the Company to attract and retain talented, well-qualified, experienced, and highly motivated executives whose performance will substantially enhance the Company’s performance;
Ø Reinforce the Company’s strategic objectives and core values;
Ø Align executive pay results with the Company’s performance results, both in terms of short-term financial performance and (2) to structure elements of compensation so that performance consistent with deliveringlong-term shareholder value creation; while not encouraging excessive risk taking; and
Ø Reflect sound governance principles and achieving the Company’s annual and long-term goals is suitably rewarded, whilst being cautious not to encourage excessive risk. best practices.


16

To further these objectives, we:

Ø Target total compensation opportunities near the program utilizesmarket median, with other relevant factors also being considered when making pay determinations (e.g., experience, growth potential, internal equity, succession planning, etc.);
Ø Provide a higher portion of target total compensation in the form of variable incentives other than fixed base salary, such that the actual compensation earned by our executives increases or decreases based on Company performance and shareholder value;
Ø Utilize both long-short-term and short-term performance-based compensation components paid in cashlong-term incentives to appropriately balance the achievement of annual operating plans, multi-year financial objectives, and equity, designedlong-term shareholder value creation;
Ø Evaluate performance measures, weights, and goals annually to ensure alignment with a focus on total direct compensation targets which the Committee aspires to establish at or around the 50thpercentile of the Company’s peer benchmarking group.

business strategy and performance expectations, which evolve as the operating environment and business mix change; and

Ø Denominate and settle long-term incentive awards in Company stock andrequire executives to achieve and maintain a minimum level of stock ownership.

Shareholder “Say on Pay”

     For 2018, Results and Response


In making determinations regarding our executive compensation program, including the compensation of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee once again implementedconsiders the shareholders' response to the non-binding advisory proposal regarding NEO compensation (the "say-on-pay” proposal). The Compensation Committee has utilized the same compensation program structure it has used since 2010. AlthoughDuring that time, the say-on-pay proposal has generally garnered highly favorable results, which has informed our decision to continue to implement that structure. However, at the 2020 annual meeting, the say-on-pay proposal was approved by 74% of votes cast, which was notably less than prior years. As a result, the Committee undertook to examine the reasons for this lower approval rate and concluded that the result was most likely driven by a multi-year retention incentive given to our CFO that was not performance-based.The Committee had approved that retention incentive to ensure stability and continuity within senior management, following announced departures of our then-current Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel.A time-based, cash retention incentive is not a typical element of our compensation structure.It was granted to only one NEO and was considered a one-time grant in response to unanticipated events. At that time of uncertainty, the grant was considered to be in the best interests of the 2018 “say on pay” vote were not available whenCompany and its shareholders.In the event retention incentives are contemplated in the future, the Committee was adopting the 2018is aware of shareholder sentiment that they should be performance-based. Nonetheless, this examination did, as a whole, affirm our belief that out overall compensation program in February 2018, voting results from prior years had a significant impact on that decision. In 2017, shareholders representing 99.7% of the votes cast expressed approval of the Company’s executive compensation. In 2018, the votes for approval represented 83.3% of the votes cast.

structure is viewed favorably by our shareholders.


Roles in Structuring Compensation


The Role of Compensation Committee


The Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving compensation for all of our executive officers. The Committee considers, adopts, reviews, and revises the various compensation plans, programs and guidelines, and reviews and determines all components of each executive officer’s compensation. The Committee also reports to, and receives feedback from, the full Board of Directors each quarter. With respect to CEO compensation, the determination of the Committee reflects advice and input from the full Board of Directors and takes into account the full Board’s assessment of CEO performance.

The Role of the Compensation Consultant

     The Committee retains Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PMP”) as an executive compensation consultant to provide benchmarking and comparative compensation analysis. PMP’s findings and recommendations form part of the basis used in the ongoing review and design of the Company’s compensation programs. Their analysis is normally performed annually in the case of the Company’s CEO, CFO and business unit Presidents, and periodically with respect to other members of the senior management team. Analyses completed by PMP in late 2017 and early 2018 were considered by the Committee when establishing 2018 total direct compensation targets and base salary increases. In addition, PMP was retained and provided compensation consulting services in connection with (1) the CEO search process which culminated in the hiring of Mr. Jarrault, (2) the adoption of a new peer group (see page 20) and (3) the changes to director compensation enacted in 2018.



The Role of Executive Officers


The Committee’s Charter provides that input from management is expected, and in some instances required, in connection with the Committee’s exercise of its responsibilities. Company management does make recommendations to the Committee from time to time regarding the elimination or modification of existing benefit plans, or the adoption of new plans. In addition, although the Committee has traditionally been responsible for reviewing and approving salary ranges for senior management, such ranges and changes are typically proposed to the Committee by the Company’s CEO after consultation with personnel from the Company’s Human Resources function.

15 


The Role of Consultants and Advisors

The Committee’s charter charges the Committee with the responsibility to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal or other advisers or consultants as the Committee may from time to time deem appropriate, and to determine the compensation and other terms of service of such advisers and consultants. The Committee has exclusive power to select, retain, and terminate the services of any such advisers or consultants to assist in evaluating the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer or senior executives, and sole power to determine the compensation and other terms of service of such consultants. The charter provides that the Company shall provide for the payment of fees and compensation to any advisers or consultants so employed by the Committee.


17

The Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Committee retains Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”) as an executive compensation consultant to provide benchmarking and comparative compensation analysis. Pearl Meyer’s findings and recommendations form part of the basis used in the ongoing review and design of the Company’s compensation programs. Their analysis is normally performed annually in the case of the Company’s CEO, CFO and business unit Presidents, and periodically with respect to other members of the senior management team. Analyses completed by Pearl Meyer in late 2019 and early 2020 were considered by the Committee when establishing 2020 total direct compensation targets and base salary increases. The Company paid Pearl Meyer $60,910 for all compensation-related services provided during 2020, including services related to the 2020 compensation program described in this Proxy Statement.

Elements of Compensation


The Company’s executive compensation program incorporates several components of compensation. Not every component need be granted, or made available, to all executives. Flexibility in the use of each discrete component provides the Committee the ability to adjust to changes in market conditions and for performance. This flexibility is evidenced in the Committee’s practice of adjusting the allocation between long- and short-term compensation, and in its varying use of cash and non-cash elements. In 2018,2020, the principal components of the executive compensation program were:


Base Salary


Annual base salary constitutes the core cash portion of the compensation for every member of management, including the NEOs. In determining the appropriate amount to be established as base salary, theThe Committee considers benchmarking data, the executive’s past performance, his or her individual importance to the Company and internal equity.

equity when establishing base salaries.


Annual Incentive Plan


The Company provides certain managers an opportunity to earn an annual cash incentive bonus. These bonus opportunities are established pursuant to the Company’s 2017 Incentive Plan. Although the amount of the bonus actually paid to a manager is determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, it is generally based on Company, business unit, and/or individual performance against established targets during the previous year. Target bonus opportunities are established as a percentage of base salary. The Committee generally excludes the senior management team (consisting of the CEO and approximately twothree to five top executives working most closely to him) from the annual cash incentive bonus and did so again in 2018.2020. Instead, the senior management team is granted the MPP and APP Performance Awards as described below. Participation in the annual cash incentive bonus program is limited to approximately 350-400 managers worldwide.


Under the annual incentive plan, a bonus at the targeted level is paid only if the Committee determines that thethreshold performance levels that it considers appropriate for the particular year have been achieved. Lesser cash incentives may be paid if such performance levels are not achieved, and larger incentives will be paid if performance exceeds such levels. Threshold performance levels are also established and performance below the threshold levels would generally result in no bonus being earned. Maximum performance levels are also established. The threshold, target and maximum performance levels are established by reference to the annual operating plan approved by the Board of Directors.


Performance Awards


Performance Awards are granted pursuant to the Company’s 2011 or 2017 Incentive Plans to the senior executive team only. They are designed to reward performance. In granting Performance Awards, the Committee considers (1) the alignment between the performance goals and the Company’s business objectives, (2) advice from its executive compensation consultant regarding the total value of the awards as a percentage of total direct compensation, as well as the ideal frequency of various award outcomes, and (3) the amounts of Performance Awards actually earned in prior years.


The performance period for the short-term performance incentive awards granted in 20182020 was the 20182020 fiscal year. This annual performance period award (the “APP Performance Award”) entitled the recipient to receive between 0% and 200% of the target award, denominated as a dollar amount, based on the extent to which certain performance goals were attained during 2018.2020. Once determined, the awards were paid out in full in cash in March 2019.2021. The performance period for the long-term performance incentive awards granted in 20182020 runs from January 1, 20182020 through December 31, 2020.2022. This multi-year performance period award (the “MPP Performance Award”) entitles the recipient to receive between 0% and 200% of the target award, denominated in shares, based on the extent to which certain cumulative performance goals were attained at the end of the three-year performance period. Once determined, the awards will be paid out in full in stock in early 2020.

2023.


When establishing performance goals for all performance-based incentive compensation, the Committee intends that there be a rather high probability that threshold levels would be met, and a rather low probability that maximum levels would be met. The performance measurement metrics and goals for the 20182020 performance-based incentive compensation program were drawn from the annual operating plan approved by the Board of Directors for 2018.

16 

2020.


18


Performance Phantom Stock


Performance Phantom Stock is granted pursuant to the Company’s Performance Phantom Stock Plan (“Performance Phantom Stock Plan”). These grants function as a retention incentive, but with a performance component. The size of any grant is determined primarily on the basis of salary and grade level, internal equity, consideration of the employee’s value to the Company, and the retentive effect of previously awarded incentives that remain outstanding. The number of units ultimately earned depends on Company performance measured against corporate-wide goals established at the beginning of the one-year performance period. Members of the senior management team have not participated in, and are not expected to participate in, this plan. These grants are targeted to approximately 125-150 top managers just below the senior management team, who also participate in the annual cash incentive bonus program.


Restricted Stock Units


Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) can be granted pursuant to the Company’s Restricted Stock Unit Plan (“RSU Plan”) to function primarily as retention incentives but theyand have been used only rarelygranted on occasion since 2010. From time to time, however, both before and after 2011, theThe RSU Plan has been be utilized to make special grants to members of the senior management team as part of special executive retention incentives. In those times, grants have been made to individual members of the senior management team, under unique situations, and not to the group as a whole. In 2018 the Committee awarded two RSU grants to members of the senior management team. Mr. Jarrault was awarded 23,567 units upon joining the Company on March 2, 2018, and Mr. Halftermeyer was awarded 12,853 units on August 31, 2018.


Other Plans and Programs


In addition to the foregoing, the Company maintains a tax-qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan in which all U.S. employees are generally eligible to participate. Under the 401(k) plan, a participant is entitled to contribute up to 100% of his or her income (subject to IRS-imposed limitations). The Company will match contributions made by the employee under the Plan, up to a maximum of 5% of the employee’s pre-tax income. The Company also maintains a profit-sharing plan for all eligible U.S. employees. Under the profit-sharing plan, the Company makes an additional, discretionary profit-sharing contribution to the accounts of eligible participants in the 401(k) plan. The amount of the contribution hasis generally been determined using the samea formula similar to one used to determine the Company’sCompany CEO’s performance under his annual APP performance award. The actual amount is determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and typically amounts to between 1% and 2.5%3% of each participant’s annual salary. The contributions are made in cash and allocated to investments chosen by plan participants.


The Company maintains a tax-qualified defined benefit plan (i.e., a pension plan) in which all salaried and most hourly U.S. employees who began their employment before October 1, 1998 participate. The Company also maintains a related supplemental executive retirement plan. NEOs who are U.S. employees and who were hired before such date accrued retirement benefits under these plans in accordance with their terms until February 28, 2009. These plans were both amended as of that date so that no additional benefits would accrue to any plan participant, effectively freezing the future benefits of any participant based on their years of service and highest earned salaries as of such date.


The amounts to which executives are entitled under these plans are dictated by the terms of the plans themselves. These are tax-qualified, nondiscriminatory plans, which apply equally to all eligible employees of the Company. The Committee is made aware of the accrued value of these entitlements when making determinations regarding executive compensation (including the NEOs), but an executive’s benefits under these plans have generally had no direct bearing on its determinations. The Committee believes that the accumulation of benefits under these plans should have no impact on its objective of compensating individuals based upon their individual importance to the Company in achieving annual and strategic objectives.


Employees located outside of the United States may enjoy benefits under local government-mandated retirement or pension plans, as well as supplementary pension or retirement plans sponsored by local Company affiliates. Mr. Halftermeyer is the only NEO employed outside of the United States. As a French citizen serving as an employee of a Swiss subsidiary of the Company while on an international assignment, he accrues benefits under both a private pension plan maintained by the Swiss subsidiary as required by Swiss law, and as an expatriate under a French government-sponsored pension program. The Company pays both the employer and employee contributions to this program in order to maintain Mr. Halftermeyer’s participation during his expatriation.

17 

The amounts paid by the Company toward both pension plans during 20182020 are reported in the “Summary“Summary Compensation Table”Table” on page 24,26, and the present value of the benefits accumulated under the Swiss private pension plan are reported in the “PENSION BENEFITS”“Pension Benefits” table on page 32.

33.







19

Structuring the 20182020 Compensation Program — Pay for Performance


The first step to determining 20182020 compensation for NEOs was to establish a total direct compensation target for each executive. The Committee considers benchmarking data as well as the executive’s past performance and his or her individual importance to the Company when establishing such targets. The Committee considers the total direct compensation target and base salary paid to similarly-situated executives at companies included in its benchmarking group (see page 20)22). It also notes the mean and median compensation paid to executives in the benchmarking group, and compares those amounts to the amounts awarded to the Company’s own executives in prior years. The Committee generally seeks to establish total direct compensation targets at or around the 50thpercentile of the benchmarking group.


Once total direct compensation targets are established, the Committee selects the compensation elements to be used, and allocates the targeted compensation among the selected components. In making these determinations, the Committee reviews the mix of the compensation paid to executives in the benchmarking group, focusing on long-term and short-term compensation, fixed and variable components, and the ratio of earned compensation paid as equity or cash. The Committee determined that the 20182020 total direct compensation target opportunities for NEOs would be paid as base salary, and through short-term and long-term incentive compensation awards. Generally, for 2018 as in prior years, theThe Committee sought to allocate approximately 35%then allocated how much of the total direct compensation target in the form of a long-term performance incentive award (i.e., the MPP Performance Award), after which it determined the appropriate base salary to be paid to the executive. The remainder of the target would then be allocated to the short-term performance incentive award (i.e., the APP Performance Award) target payout. However, upon the hiring of Mr. Jarrault, 50% of his initial total direct compensation target was allocated to his long-term performance initiative award, in line with current market practice.

each component based on benchmarking data, internal equity and other considerations.


After the total direct compensation target was allocated among these components, the Committee established the performance measurement metrics and goals against which each NEO’s performance would be judged to determine how much of the incentive compensation, if any, would be earned by that NEO at the end of 2018.2020. Lastly, the Committee determined the form in which each component should be paid, if earned. Base salary and the short-termshort–term incentive award were both established as cash compensation, while long-term performance incentive awards was determined to be payable in equity.

18 


2018

2020 NEO Compensation Opportunities


Following the structure described above, the Committee established a total direct compensation target for each of the Company’s NEOs for 2018 as follows:

2020. Those targets are set forth in the table below. Mr. Jarrault is omitted from this table, and the following tables, because he had left the Company before such targets were established. He is, however, included in the tables found in Part III of this discussion.
NEO 2018 Total Direct
Compensation Target		  2017 Total Direct
Compensation Target		  % Change
Joseph G. Morone $N/A  $4,110,000   N/A%
Olivier Jarrault $3,100,000   N/A   N/A 
John B. Cozzolino $1,427,000  $1,400,000   2%
Daniel A. Halftermeyer $1,150,000  $1,150,000   0%
Robert A. Hansen $662,000  $662,000   0%
Charles J. Silva $647,000  $628,000   3%
NEO
2019 Total Direct
Compensation Target
2020 Total Direct
Compensation Target
% Change
A. William Higgins$N/A$3,400,000N/A
Stephen Nolan$1,498,750$1,526,0002%
Daniel Halftermeyer$1,179,500$1,193,1001%
Greg Harwell$N/A$1,347,500N/A
Alice McCarvill$727,500$771,7536%






The Committee then determined the amount of the total direct compensation target that should be paid as base salary.

NEO 2018
Base Salary		  % of Total
Direct Target		 2017 to 2018
% Change
Morone $865,000   21%  0%
Jarrault $775,000   26%  N/A 
Cozzolino $456,187   32%  0%
Halftermeyer $479,980   41.7%  0%
Hansen $299,000   45%  0%
Silva $393,000   60%  2.8%

     The Committee opted not to change the base salary, for Messrs. Cozzolino, Halftermeyer or Hansen in 2018, in order to keep them aligned with benchmark data.

as follows:.

NEO
2020
Base Salary
% of Total
Direct Target
2019 to 2020
% Change
A. William Higgins$850,00025%N/A
Stephen Nolan$545,00036%0%
Daniel Halftermeyer$492,00041%0%
Greg Harwell$490,00036%N/A
Alice McCarvill$358,95547%3%

Lastly, the Committee determined the proper allocation between stock and cash for the performance awards. For 2018,2020, the MPP Performance Award allocation was 100% stock, and a distinct target share opportunity was identified. The calculationgrant date share price was used to determine the actual number of shares for the MPP Performance Award target share opportunity used an estimated average future stock price.target. For the APP Performance Award, the allocation was 100% cash, and a target dollar amount was identified in the award agreement. The following table sets forth the target opportunities established for each of the NEOs for the MPP Performance Award and the APP Performance Award.

NEO APP
Opportunity Cash		 MPP
Opportunity Shares
Morone        N/A     N/A
Jarrault $775,000 23,396
Cozzolino $454,000   7,804
Halftermeyer $268,000   6,083
20

     Messrs. Hansen and Silva were not granted Performance Awards in 2018. Instead, and in keeping with the Committee’s decision to limit Performance Awards to the most senior executives for 2018, they, and other executive officers, were awarded grants of Performance Phantom Stock. Mr. Hansen’s 2018 award consisted of a grant of 3,690 shares of Performance Phantom Stock and Mr. Silva’s award consisted of 1,892 shares.

     Dr. Morone was not granted any performance awards in recognition of his pending retirement.


NEO
APP
Opportunity Cash
MPP
Opportunity Shares
A. William Higgins$850,00022,779
Stephen Nolan$381,5008,033
Daniel Halftermeyer$273,0605,735
Greg Harwell$343,0006,894
Alice McCarvill$179,4783,126


Other Compensation Polices and Considerations


Timing of Awards and Grants


Base salary increases are determined by the Committee at its first meeting after completion of the fiscal year when all relevant data is available. This meeting typically occurs in February, with increases becoming effective in April. The Committee also typically approves Performance Award grants, annual cash incentive bonuses and Performance Phantom Stock grants at this meeting.


The Effect of Prior or Accumulated Compensation


When considering each element of compensation, the Committee reviews historic compensation summaries for each executive officer and other members of the senior management team. These summaries show all material elements of annual and long-term compensation actually earned by each executive in the immediate prior year and, depending on the executive’s length of service, several years prior thereto. They also show the outstanding balances

19 

of RSU or Phantom Stock grants and any equity-based awards, and the unrealized gains on those balances. The Committee considers this information before approving new Performance Awards, base salary increases, or final annual cash incentive bonuses for the prior year. These summaries are used to determine how effectively past compensation practices satisfy the Committee’s objectives.


Although these summaries provide insight into an executive’s accumulated compensation, it is the Committee’s view that neither the historical data nor any perceived wealth accumulation justifies a change in either the Committee’s current compensation philosophy or the elements of compensation employed. It is the Committee’s belief that an executive’s accumulated compensation is the result of his or her achievement of a series of objectives over time. Furthermore, it is the Company’s view that the effect of such accumulated compensation is not sufficient to call into question the Committee’s objective of compensating individuals based on their individual importance to the Company in achieving strategic objectives. The Committee views “realizable” future compensation as having been earned by the employee based on past employment and performance. As a result, such “realizable” future compensation has generally had little, if any, bearing on the amount or timing of new compensation approved or awarded. The Committee does not believe that the compensation paid to its executives, including the NEOs, or any individual element of that compensation, is lavish or extraordinary.


Independence of Compensation Consultant and Identity of Benchmarking Group


For its 20182020 benchmarking and comparative compensation analysis, the Committee again retained the services of PMP. Pearl Meyer.The Committee has used the services of PMPPearl Meyer since 2010. The Company paid PMP $44,845 in 2018,Pearl Meyer $60,190 for servicesduring 2020 including such benchmarking and comparative compensation analysis as well as other services (see page 15)p. 18). The Committee routinely assesses the independence of PMPPearl Meyer using criteria established by the New York Stock Exchange and has consistently determined them to be independent.


For 2018, PMP2020, Pearl Meyer benchmarked individual compensation against a new peer group of publicly-traded companies approved by the Committee in 2017. In light of the growth of the AEC business unit, and the increasing impact it has to the overall Company performance, the Committee had asked PMP to review and assess the peer group to ensure (1) that it reflected the evolving size and scope of the Company’s two business units and (2) that it remained comparable in terms of revenue size, enterprise value and EBITDA. Upon completing its analysis, PMP recommended a new peer group consisting of 20 publicly traded U.S. companies (identified below) in the same or related industries with comparable revenues, employees, and international operations. The Committee adopted PMP’s recommendation and approved the use of this newThis peer group for bothisreviewed annually, and was first approved by the changesCommittee in 2017, when it consisted of 20 companies (two companies were subsequently acquired and no longer trade publicly). The benchmarking data used was derived from proxy statements filed by these companies prior to director compensation enacted in 2018 and the 2018 executive compensation benchmarking and comparative compensation analysis.

2020. (Since that time, another four companies listed below have ceased to trade publicly.)








21

The peer group of comparable publicly traded U.S. companies consisted of the following:

Teledyne Technologies
     Incorporated
Woodward, Inc.
Aerojet Rocketdyne
     Holdings, Inc.
Barnes Group, Inc.
Kadant, Inc.
Tredegar Corp.		ESCO Technologies Inc.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
IncorporatedDonaldson Company, Inc.
Esterline Technologies
Hexcel Corporation
Kaman Corporation
HEICO Corporation
Neenah Paper,
Woodward, Inc.
Lydall, Inc.		Astronics Corporation
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Hexcel Corporation
P. H. Glatfelter Company
Xerium Technologies,
Aerojet RocketdyneKaman CorporationSchweitzer-Maudit
Holdings, Inc.
TriMas		HEICO Corporation
Schweitzer-Maudit
International, Inc.
Barnes Group, Inc.Neenah Paper, Inc.TriMas Corporation
Kadant, Inc.Lydall, Inc.
Tredegar Corp.


Representatives from PMPPearl Meyer communicate directly with members of management as needed, including the Company’s CEO and personnel from the Human Resources function, with the acknowledgement and encouragement of the Committee. However, the consultant is retained by, instructed by, serves for, and reports to the Committee, and its main point of contact remains the Chairman of the Committee. Notwithstanding the use of a compensation consultant, the Committee is ultimately responsible for all compensation matters.


The Impact of Accounting or Tax Considerations


When confronted with a choice between two comparable forms of compensation, the Committee has in the past favored the form with the lower tax cost (to the employee and/or the Company), more favorable accounting treatment, or more favorable impact on the Company’s borrowing cost pursuant to its primary revolving credit facility.

20 


Equity Ownership Requirements or Guidelines


The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted new stock ownership guidelines during 2020 for our NEOs that are designed to further align the Company’s CEO, CFOinterests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. Under the guidelines, NEOs, and the Presidents of its business segments. Those guidelines provide that the CEO iscertain other officers, are expected to own and hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock (Class A or Class B) equal in value to three (3)two times current base salary. The others are expected to own and hold shares equal in value to at least their base salary.salary, or five times in the case of the Chief Executive Officer. There is no deadline by which these such targets should be attained,to meet this requirement, but at any time that the value of one’san executive officer’s holdings is less than his or herthe target, he or she will beis expected to retain, in addition to all shares already owned, (1) all shares acquired upon the exercise of any stock options, and (2) allnew shares received upon a distribution of shares pursuant to the terms of any Performance Award (in each case, net(net of shares used, if any, to satisfy theany exercise price, taxes, or commissions). Moreover, those subjectThe new guidelines increased the share ownership targets and made them applicable to such guidelines are also expected to retain all future net grantsNEOs. As of shares, except for sales approved byDecember 31, 2020 Mr. Halftermeyer was the CEO, or by the Board of Director in the case of a sale contemplated by the CEO. Mr. Jarrault has not yetonly NEO who had reached the applicable guideline, but Messrs. Cozzolino and Halftermeyer each own shares of value equal to at least their base salary. (Dr. Morone had metguideline. (The remaining NEOs have only been with the threshold before the time of his retirement.) The Committee does not believe that adoption of share ownership guidelinesCompany for other officers is warranted at this time.

three years or less.)


Anti-hedging Policy

No officer, director or employee of the Company is permitted to purchase or use, directly, or indirectly, through family members or other persons or entities, financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to offset or hedge any decrease in market value of Company securities.


Risk Assessment of Compensation Plans and Programs


During 2018,2020, the Committee, after reviewing its compensation plans and programs, particularly those components which are employed as part of the incentive compensation plans for the NEOs and other executives, re-affirmed its prior determinations that such plans and programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In reaching this conclusion, the Committee compiled an inventory of all executive compensation plans and programs globally and evaluated those plans and programs as potential contributors to Company risks. The conclusion is based on the finding that the Company’s executive compensation structure consists of a balanced mix of components that utilize both equity and cash elements, impose caps on incentives, apply multiple performance measures, establish staggered performance and payout periods, and rely on the Committee’s use of discretion in approving final awards. The Committee also noted the Company’s policies related to severance, perquisites, and change-in-control provisions, as well as its adoption of clawback/recoupment mechanisms. During its discussion, the Committee recognized its own oversight responsibilities and noted that it requires all senior management incentive compensation calculations to be reviewed by its internal or external auditor. It then determined that its practices, coupled with the structure of the executive compensation plans and programs, appropriately mitigate any risks associated with compensation programs.





22

Employment Contracts — Named Executive Officers


The Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. JarraultHiggins dated March 2, 2018, and amended July 25, 2018 and March 15, 2019, which providedJanuary 20, 2020.The Agreement provides that Mr. Jarrault would be hired as President and CEO commencing on March 2, 2018. Employment mayemployment could be terminated by either party at any time. The Agreement providesIt provided for an initial base salary of $775,000,$850,000, and the award of restricted stock units pursuant to the Company’s RSU Plan with a grant date value of $1.5 million, with one-third of that grant vesting on each of the first three (3) anniversaries of the grant. The Agreement also provides for an Annual Performance Award and Multi-year Performance Award, as more fully described above. The Agreement entitles Mr. JarraultHiggins to four weeks of vacation with pay, or such greater amount as the Company’s vacation policy applicable to executive officers provides and entitles him to participate in the Company’s employee benefit plans, policies, and arrangements applicable to executive officers generally (including, for example, 401(k), health care, vision, life insurance, and disability); in each case, as the same may exist from time to time, as well as such perquisites as may from time to time be made generally available to senior executives of the Company. In addition, while the contract, as amended, requires that Mr. Jarrault will relocate to Rochester, New Hampshire no later than December 31, 2019, it also provides that in the interim the Company will reimburse him for all temporary living expenses, including housing, transportation and meals, grossed up for tax purposes. The Agreement includes a severance provision whichthat is more fully described below. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had not entered into employment contracts with any other NEO.

21 


PART II

2018

2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION EARNED


Performance Award Metrics and Goals


The 20182020 APP Performance Awards granted to NEOs contained performance measurement metrics and goals appropriate to that executive. In some cases, where appropriate, executives may share a metric and its related goal. The following table setstables set forth the metrics chosen for each NEO’s APP Performance Award, and the percentage that each metric counted toward the NEO’s overall performance. (The definitions of the listed metrics are contained inExhibit A to this Proxy Statement.)

 2018 Weighted
Corporate
Performance
Metric		 2018 Global
MC Cash
Flow
Jarrault  100%  0% 
Cozzolino  100%  0% 
Halftermeyer  0%  100% 


Higgins, Nolan & McCarvill
Performance MetricsWeight
1. 2020 AIN Adjusted EBITDA80%
2. AIN TRIR10%
3. AIN Compliance/ External Auditors5%
4. AIN Compliance/ Internal Auditors5%
Halftermeyer
Performance MetricsWeight
1. 2020 MC Adjusted EBITDA80%
3. MC TRIR10%
4. MC Compliance/ External Auditors5%
5. MC Compliance/ Internal Auditors5%
Harwell
Performance MetricsWeight
1. 2020 AEC Adjusted EBITDA80%
3. AC TRIR10%
4. AEC Compliance/ External Auditors5%
5. AEC Compliance/ Internal Auditors5%












23


The threshold, target and maximum goals for 2018 Weighted Corporate Performance Metric is determined in reference to the goals of the component parts of the metric as described inExhibit A. The threshold, target and maximum goals for 2018 Global MC Cash Flowthese metrics were as follows:


Performance MetricPerformance Metric Percentage Goals
ThresholdTargetMaximum
2018 Global2020 AIN Adjusted EBITDA =
$164.3M		 =
$222.0M		 =
$279.7M
AIN TRIR =
1.6
TRIRs		 =
1.1
TRIRs		 =
0.3
TRIRs
2020 MC Cash FlowAdjusted EBITDA =
$100.1M55.28M		 =
$166.8M194.7M		 =
$232.92M
MC TRIR =
1.2
TRIRs		 =
0.85
TRIRs		 =
0.3
TRIRs
2020 AEC Adjusted EBITDA =
$233.6M51.3M		 =
$85.5M		 =
$119.7M
AEC TRIR =
2.3
TRIRs		 =
1.5
TRIRs		 =
0.35
TRIRs
AIN Compliance/External AuditorsTo Be Calculated as Described in Exhibit A
AIN Compliance/Internal AuditorsTo Be Calculated as Described in Exhibit A
MC Compliance/External AuditorsTo Be Calculated as Described in Exhibit A
MC Compliance/Internal AuditorsTo Be Calculated as Described in Exhibit A
AEC Compliance/External AuditorsTo Be Calculated as Described in Exhibit A
AEC Compliance/Internal AuditorsTo Be Calculated as Described in Exhibit A

     The Performance Phantom Stock awards for Messrs. Hansen and Silva, like all other Performance Phantom Stock awards granted in 2018, contained only one performance measurement metric — 2018 Weighted Corporate Performance — which had the same target goals as stated in Mr. Jarrault’s and Mr. Cozzolino’s APP Performance Awards.



The following table sets forth the metrics chosen for each NEO’s 20182020 MPP Performance Award, and the percentage that each metric counted toward overall performance. In each case, these metrics are aggregated to reflect the three-year performance period, and the goals established as the cumulative projected results for each metric in 2018, 2019,2020, 2021, and 2020.2022. The Committee has determined that disclosing actual goals would result in competitive harm to the Company.

  Aggregate
Adjusted Global
AEC EBITDA
excluding R&D		 Aggregate
Global MC
Cash Flow
Jarrault 50%   50%
Cozzolino 50%   50%
Halftermeyer   0% 100%

Higgins, Nolan & McCarvill
Performance MetricWeight
Aggregate AIN Adjusted EBITDA100%
Halftermeyer
Performance MetricWeight
1. Aggregate AIN Adjusted EBITDA40%
2. Aggregate MC Adjusted EBITDA60%
Harwell
Performance MetricWeight
1. Aggregate AIN Adjusted EBITDA40%
2. Aggregate AEC Adjusted EBITDA60%

According to the applicable incentive plan and award agreements, the foregoing goals (including the threshold and maximum goals) are subject to subsequent adjustment in the event of unanticipated business developments during the applicable performance periods, such as acquisition or divestiture of business operations.


The Committee purposefully chose to utilize cash flowAdjusted EBITDA metrics in both the short-term and long-term performance incentive grants. It was the Committee’s determination that creating an incentive for the senior executive team based on cash flowAdjusted EBITDA was consistent with the Company’s goals and strategies, and that a three-year performance period created sufficient balance against a one-year performance period.

24


Achievement of Goals and Awards Earned


The Committee is responsible for reviewing performance against goals and establishing final incentive compensation payouts at the end of each performance period. It is at that point when the total direct compensation actually earned by the NEO can be determined. In early 2019,2021, and based on the Company’s audited 20182020 financial statements, and other corporate records, the Committee determined one-year performance versus threshold, target and maximum goals for each performance metric. The Committee determined that 2018 Global MC Cash Flowdetermined:

Ø 2020 AIN Adjusted EBITDA was $193.8$252.9 million, representing an achievement of 140.4%153.6% of goal; that 2018
Ø The total recordable incident rate at the corporate level was .84, resulting in an achievement of 143.3% of goal;
Ø 2020 MC Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D was $70.8$218.9 million, representing an achievement of 110.3%163.9% of goal; and that 2018 Other Cash Flow (as defined
Ø The total recordable incident rate at the MC level was .81, resulting inExhibit A)

22 

an achievement of 110.0% of goal;

Ø 2020 AEC Adjusted EBITDA was -$49.5$82.0 million, representing an achievement of 113.8%94.9% of goal. Based ongoal; and

Ø The total recordable incident rate at the foregoing,AEC level was .93, resulting in an achievement of 161.3% of goal;

The Committee also determined that the Committee determined that overall achievement levelCompany had met its goals with regard to the all of the 2018 Weighted Corporate Performance Metric goal amountedcompliance metrics identified above, due to 124.2%.

the absence of any material weaknesses in the report of external auditors and the satisfactory remediation of any applicable findings in the report of internal auditors.


Based upon the level of achievement of the foregoing performance measurement metrics, and following a proration for partial year service and the exercise of negative discretion, the Committee determined each NEO’s overall performance percentage achieved, and calculated the amount of APP Performance Award targets actually earned, as follows:

  Overall
Performance
Achievement		 Cash Earned
Jarrault 124.2% $802,125
Cozzolino   62.1% $281,934
Halftermeyer 140.4% $376,272

     Mr. Hansen earned 4,583 shares of Performance Phantom Stock. Mr. Silva earned 2,350 shares of Performance Phantom Stock.

Overall Performance Achievement
Higgins
147.2%
Nolan
147.2%
Halftermeyer
152.1%
Harwell
102.0%
McCarvill
147.2%
Cash Earned(1)
$1,183,931$561,568$415,324$349,860$264.589
(1)In the case of Mr. Higgins, the amount of cash shown as earned was following a reduction, on prorated basis, to reflect actual length of service during 2020.

The performance period for MPP Performance Awards granted in 20182020 runs through December 31, 2020.2022. The Company considers compensation earned under an MPP Performance Award to have been earned over the entirety of the performance period. 2018However, 2020 was also the final year of the three-year performance period for MPP Performance Awards granted in 2016.2018. Messrs. Jarrault and Halftermeyer are the only NEOs who were granted an MPP Performance Award in 2018. The sole metric chosen for Mr. Halftermeyer’s 2018 MPP Performance Award, which counted for 100% toward his overall performance, was Aggregate Global MC Cashflow. There were two performance metrics chosen for each NEO’s 2016Mr. Jarrault’s 2018 MPP Performance Award,Award: Aggregate Global MC Cashflow and the percentage thatAggregate Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D, each metric counted toward the NEO’s overall performance, are presented in the following table.equally weighted at 50%. The threshold, target and maximum goals for each metricthe metrics are presented in the subsequent table.

  Aggregate
Adjusted Global
AEC EBITDA
excluding R&D		 Aggregate
Global MC
Cash Flow
Morone 40% 60%
Cozzolino 40% 60%
Halftermeyer 0% 100%

Aggregate
Adjusted Global
AEC EBITDA
excluding R&D		Aggregate
Global MC
Cash Flow
Performance
Metric
Performance Metric Percentage Goals
ThresholdTarget$80.4M$349.4MMaximum
Target
Aggregate Global
 MC Cashflow
 =
$125.6M300.0M		 =
$500.0M		 =
$499.2M700.0M
Maximum
Aggregate
 Adjusted Global
 AEC EBITDA
 excluding R&D
 =
$195.9M169.6M		 =
$282.7M		 =
$698.9M395.7M

     Messrs. Hansen and Silva were not granted MPP Performance Awards in 2016.


In early 2019,2021, based on the Company’s audited financial statements for 20162018 through 20182020 (which include each year in the performance period), the Committee determined performance versus threshold, target and maximum goals for each of the foregoing performance metrics.metric. The Committee determined that that:

Ø Aggregate Global MC Cash Flow over the three-year period was $555.8$592.0 million, representing an achievement of 128.3%146.0% of target; and that
Ø Aggregate Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D was $134.5$262.1 million, representing an achievement of 112.7%90.9% of target.


Based on the level of achievement of the foregoingthese performance measurement metrics, and following a proration for partial years of service and the exercise of negative discretion, the Committee determined each NEO’sthat Messrs. Jarrault and Halftermeyer’s overall performance percentage achieved and calculated the amount of their MPP Performance Award targets actually earned, as follows:

  Morone Cozzolino Halftermeyer
Overall Performance Achievement 122.1% 101.7% 128.3%
Shares Earned 18,420 7,595 7,870
Cash Earned $483,456 $199,332 $206,563

23 


25

Halftermeyer
Jarrault(1)
Overall
Performance
Achievement
146.0%118.5%
Shares Earned8,88218,984

(1)In the case of Mr. Jarrault, the amount of cash shown as earned was following a reduction, on prorated basis, to reflect actual length of service during performance period.
PART III

REQUIRED COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table


The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Named Executive Officers for 2016, 20172018, 2019 and 2018.

Name and
Principal Position		Year Salary
($)		 Bonus(1)
($)		  Stock
Awards(2)
($)		  Option
Awards(3)
($)		  Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)		 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
($)		 All Other
Compensation
($)		 Total
($)		 
                      
Joseph G. Morone, 2016  840,480   0   1,449,577   —   1,771,180(5)  0   14,453(6)  4,075,690 
Former- President 2017  858,869   0   1,531,063   —   1,558,588(7)  0   12,990(8)  3,961,510 
and CEO 2018  147,494   0   0   —   0   0   7,968(9)  155,462 
                      
Olivier Jarrault, 2018  645,833       3,000,000       804,875(10)  0   183,444(11)  4,634,152 
Current President                                  
and CEO                                  
                      
John B. Cozzolino, 2016  452,865   0   501,281   —   472,099(12)  14,000   14,751(13)  1,454,996 
Chief Financial Officer 2017  456,186   0   481,063   —   386,796(14)  19,000   11,016(15)  1,354,061 
  2018  456,187   0   517,000   —   288,809(16)  15,000   10,587(17)  1,287,583 
                      
Daniel A. Halftermeyer, 2016  662,512(18)  0   359,134   —   318,302(19)  20,939   224,454(18,20)  1,585,341 
President, Machine 2017  635,250(21)  0   359,972   —   324,015(22)  17,921   226,971(21,23)  1,564,129 
Clothing 2018  639,518(24)  0   1,403,000   —   376,272(25)  11,914   230,712(24,26)  2,661,416 
                      
Robert A. Hansen, 2016  295,520   144,332   256,838   —   6,307(27)  62,000   15,398(28)  780,395 
Sr. VP and Chief 2017  298,580   137,997   333,016   —   4,860(29)  67,000   15,659(30)  857,112 
Technology Officer 2018  298,580   138,601   246,308   —   6,875(31)  38,000   15,580(33)  743,944 
                      
Charles J. Silva, Jr 2016  375,916   151,968   113,699   —   6,307(33)  29,000   14,517(34)  691,407 
VP, General 2017  382,221   117,350   114,511   —   4,860(35)  34,000   14,767(36)  667,709 
Counsel & Secretary 2018  390,305   164,818   126,291   —   6,875(37)  23,000   14,671(38)  725,960 

2020.
Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus(1)
($)
Stock
Awards(2)
($)
Option
Awards(3)
($)
Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
A. William Higgins, President and CEO2020808,5891,700,000
1,186,118(5)
19,854 (6)
3,714,562
Olivier Jarrault,
Former President and CEO
2018645,8333,000,000804,875(7)—183,444(8)4,634,152
2019831,2501,700,000—1,107,460(9)—240,262(10)3,878,972
20201,776,554(11)———43,106(12)1,819,660
Stephen Nolan
Chief Financial Officer
2019408,750753,467—377,806(13)—60,618(14)1,600,640
2020545,000599,5001,320,317(15)—16,920(16)2,481,737
Daniel A. Halftermeyer,
President, Machine Clothing
2018639,518(17)1,403,000—376,272(18)11,914230,676(17,19)2,661,380
2019641,350(20)413,000—309,697(21)15,636348,778(20,22)1,728,461
2020683,675(23)428,040—415,324(24)115,008208,555(23,25)1,850,602
Greg Harwell, President, Albany Engineered Composites201965,961300,000—175,467(26)2,222(27)543,650
2020499,423514,500—
358,609(28)
18,742(29)
1,391,274
Alice McCarvill
EVP - Human Resources
2018261,538162,415183,466—6,538(30)—13,236(31)627,193
2019346,375204,750—233,363(32)—14,821(33)799,309
2020356,341233,321273,338(34)17,259(35)880,259

(1)The figure provided represents the Annual Incentive Plan bonus earned,sum of any non-APP annual incentive or any additional discretionary bonuscash bonuses awarded, during that year, if any, forwith respect to performance during thatsuch year, but which was actually paid in the subsequent year.regardless of when paid.
(2)The figure provided for each year represents the grant date fair value, in dollars, of (a) the target share amounts contained in any Performance Awards granted during that year under the 2011 Incentive Plan or 2017 Incentive Plan, (b) all Restricted Stock Units granted in that year under the Company’s Restricted Stock Unit Plan, and/orand (c) all Performance Phantom Stock granted in that year under the Company’s Performance Stock Plan. In all cases, the total presented is the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Item 718.
26

(3)No options have been granted since 2002.
(4)The figure provided for each year represents the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each NEO’s (except Mr. Halftermeyer’s) accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans (including supplemental plans) from the prior year. The change is calculated between the pension plan measurement dates used by the Company for financial statement reporting purposes in each year. The figure also reflects any changes in actuarial assumptions. Reference is made to Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182020 for a discussion of these assumptions. The figure provided for Mr. Halftermeyer represents the change in present value of the private pension purchased for Mr. Halftermeyer through a Swiss insurance company in accordance with Swiss law (see footnote 42 to the “PENSION BENEFITS”“Pension Benefits” table on page 32)pp. 33). There were no above-market or preferential earnings during 2016, 2017,2018, 2019 or 20182020 for any of the NEOs under any deferred compensation plans.

24 

(5)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $6,307$2,187 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; and (b) $1,216,633,$1,183,931, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 20112017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 20162020 and paid during 2017; and (c) $548,240, the target cash amount set forth in his MPP Performance Award granted in 2016 under the 2011 Incentive Plan, payable in 2019 based on performance during the three-year performance period.2021.
(6)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $11,969$9,327 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution planplan; and (b) a premium of $2,484$10,527 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(7)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $4,860 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; (b) $978,328, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2017 and paid during 2018; and (c) $575,400, the target cash amount set forth in his MPP Performance Award granted in 2017 under the 2011 Incentive Plan, payable in 2020 based on performance during the three-year performance period.
(8)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $10,506 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan and (b) a premium of $2,484 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(9)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $7,374 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan and (b) a premium of $594 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(10)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $2,750 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan, and (b) $802,125, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 20172011 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2018 and paid during 2019.
(11)(8)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $10,520 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; and (b) a premium of $1,192 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer; and (c) expenses of $171,731 related to the NEO’s temporary travel and housing, consisting of housing ($32,840), travel and and living expenses ($78,588), car lease ($14,871) and tax adjustments ($45,432).
(12)(9)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $6,307$7,560 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; and (b) $269,792,$1,099,900, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 20162019 and paid during 2017; and (c) $196,000, the target cash amount set forth in his MPP Performance Award granted in 2016 under the 2011 Incentive Plan, payable in 2019 based on performance during the three-year performance period.2020.
(13)(10)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,250$14,000 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; (b) a premium of $1,782 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer; and (c) expenses of $224,480 related to the NEO’s temporary travel and housing, consisting of housing ($73,260), travel and living expenses ($62,835), car lease ($33,780) and tax adjustments ($54,605).
(11)Includes severance payments of $1,700,000.
(12)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $3,828 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; (b) a premium of $623 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer; and (c) expenses of $38,655 related to the NEO’s temporary travel and housing, consisting of housing and living expenses ($22,533), car lease ($5,539) and tax adjustments ($10,583).
(13)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $7,560 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; and (b) $370,246, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2019 and paid during 2020.
(14)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $9,458 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; (b) a premium of $971 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer; (c) relocation expenses of $35,631; and (d) tax adjustments $14,557.
(15)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $8,749 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; (b) $561,568, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2020 and paid during 2021; and (c) $750,000, the target cash payment of a retention bonus awarded to the officer in 2020.
(16)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $14,050 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan andand; (b) a premium of $1,501$2,870 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(14)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $4,860 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; (b) $185,936, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2017 and paid during 2018; and (c) $196,000, the target cash amount set forth in his MPP Performance Award granted in 2017 under the 2011 Incentive Plan, payable in 2020 based on performance during the three-year performance period.
(15)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $9,504 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan and (b) a premium of $1,512 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(16)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $6,875 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; and (b) 281,934, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2018 and paid during 2019.
(17)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $9,503 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan and (b) a premium of $1,084 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(18)Represents either the amount paid in euros, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.1069 dollars per euro, or the amount paid in Swiss francs, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.0154 dollars per Swiss franc, which are the rates used by the Company in its 2016 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings.
(19)Includes (a) $157,302, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan earned during 2016 and paid during 2017; and (b) $161,000, the target cash amount

25 

set forth in his MPP Performance Award granted in 2016 under the 2011 Incentive Plan, payable in 2019 based on performance during the three-year performance period.

(20)Includes (a) a premium of $23,314 paid by the Company with respect to maintenance of private Swiss health insurance coverage; (b) contributions of $102,098 to maintain the NEO in French social programs, including state pension schemes, during his expatriation (of which approximately $36,755 was the officer’s employee contribution paid by the Company); (c) expenses of $97,215 related to the NEO’s international assignment, consisting of housing ($64,305) and tax adjustments ($32,910); and (d) perquisites of $1,827, valued on the basis of the taxable benefit for the private use of a Company car.
(21)Represents either the amount paid in euros, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.1284 dollars per euro, or the amount paid in Swiss francs, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.016 dollars per Swiss franc, which are the rates used by the Company in its 2017 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings.
(22)Includes (a) $163,015, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan earned during 2017 and paid during 2018; and (b) $161,000, the target cash amount set forth in his MPP Performance Award granted in 2017 under the 2011 Incentive Plan, payable in 2020 based on performance during the three-year performance period.
(23)Includes (a) a premium of $27,855 paid by the Company with respect to maintenance of private Swiss health insurance coverage; (b) contributions of $105,825 to maintain the NEO in French social programs, including state pension schemes, during his expatriation (of which approximately $38,096 was the officer’s employee contribution paid by the Company); (c) expenses of $91,491 related to the NEO’s international assignment, consisting of housing ($59,375) and tax adjustments ($32,116); and (d) perquisites of $1,800, valued on the basis of the taxable benefit for the private use of a Company car.
(24)Represents either the amount paid in euros, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.18085 dollars per euro, or the amount paid in Swiss francs, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.02247 dollars per Swiss franc, which are the rates used by the Company in its 2018 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings.
(25)(18)Represents the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan earned during 2018 and paid during 2019.
27

(26)
(19)Includes (a) a premium of $27,052 paid by the Company with respect to maintenance of private Swiss health insurance coverage; (b) contributions of $112,146 to maintain the NEO in French social programs, including state pension schemes, during his expatriation (of which approximately $40,361 was the officer’s employee contribution paid by the Company); (c) expenses of $89,674 related to the NEO’s international assignment, consisting of housing ($59,753) and tax adjustments ($29,921); and (d) perquisites of $1,840,$1,804, valued on the basis of the taxable benefit for the private use of a Company car.
(20)(27)Represents either the amount paid in euros, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.11954 dollars per euro, or the amount paid in Swiss francs, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.00650 dollars per Swiss franc, which are the rates used by the Company in its 2019 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings.
(21)Consists of profit-sharing of $6,307Represents the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.2017 Incentive Plan earned during 2019 and paid during 2020.
(28)(22)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,250 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; (b) a premium of $979$21,665 paid by the Company with respect to life or othermaintenance of private Swiss health insurance coverage; (b) contributions of $236,732 to maintain the NEO in French social programs, including state pension schemes, during his expatriation (of which approximately $36,776 was the officer’s employee contribution paid by the Company); (c) expenses of $88,462 related to the NEO’s international assignment, consisting of housing ($58,820) and tax adjustments ($29,642); and (d) perquisites of $1,919, valued on the basis of the taxable benefit for the benefitprivate use of a Company car.
(23)Represents either the officeramount paid in euros, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.14157 dollars per euro, or beneficiaries designatedthe amount paid in Swiss francs, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.06637 dollars per Swiss franc, which are the rates used by the officer;Company in its 2020 Consolidated Statements of Income and (c) patent awards totaling $1,169.Retained Earnings.
(24)(29)Consists of profit-sharing of $4,860Represents the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.2017 Incentive Plan earned during 2020 and paid during 2021.
(30)(25)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,500 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan and (b) a premium of $990$11,272 paid by the Company with respect to life or othermaintenance of private Swiss health insurance coverage; (b) contributions of $105,673 to maintain the NEO in French social programs, including state pension schemes, during his expatriation (of which approximately $29,726 was the officer’s employee contribution paid by the Company); (c) expenses of $89,576 related to the NEO’s international assignment, consisting of housing ($62,318) and tax adjustments ($27,255); and (d) perquisites of $2,037, valued on the basis of the taxable benefit for the benefitprivate use of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer, and (c) patent awards totaling $1,169.a Company car.
(31)(26)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $6,875$925 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.plan; (b) $74,542, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2019 and paid during 2020, and (c) a $100,000 sign on bonus.
(32)(27)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,750 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan and (b) a premium of $710 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer, and (c) patent awards totaling $1,120.
(33)Consists of profit-sharing of $6,307 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.
(34)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,250$1,885 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; and (b) a premium of $1,267$337 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(28)(35)Consists ofIncludes (a) profit-sharing of $4,860$8,749 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.plan; and (b) $349,860, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2020 and paid during 2021.

26 


(36)(29)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,450$14,250 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution planplan; and (b) a premium of $1,267$4,492 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(37)(30)Consists of profit-sharing of $6,875$6,538 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.
(38)(31)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $13,750$12,226 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution planplan; and (b) a premium of $921$1,010 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(32)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $7,560 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; and (b) $225,803, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2019 and paid during 2020
(33)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $14,000 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; and (b) a premium of $821 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.
(34)Includes (a) profit-sharing of $8,749 under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan; and (b) $264,589, the actual cash award received relative to his APP Performance Award granted under the 2017 Incentive Plan, in each case earned during 2020 and paid during 2021.
(35)Includes (a) Company-matching contributions of $14,250 to the officer’s account under the Company’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution plan; and (b) a premium of $3,009 paid by the Company with respect to life or other insurance for the benefit of the officer or beneficiaries designated by the officer.


CEO Pay Ratio


We are required to disclose:


• the median annual total compensation of all of our employees, excluding our CEO;
28

• the annual total compensation of our CEO; and
• the ratio between those two amounts.amounts


Mr. Jarrault’sHiggins’ total compensation for 20182020 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table above was $4,634,152.$3,714,562. Using the same format, the following table presents the median annual total compensation of all our employeesmedian employee in 20182020 (excluding Mr. Jarrault)Higgins):

Name and
Principal Position		YearSalary
($)		BonusStock
Awards
($)		Option
Awards
($)		Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)		Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)		All Other
Compensation
($)		Total
($)
Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation ($)
Total
($)
  
Median Employee(1)201837,713000 0847(2)6,94515,686(3)61,191
Median Employee(1)
202045,3031000101,630 202,266350,199


(1)All amounts shown represents the amount paid in Canadian dollars, translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 0.77169 US. dollars per Canadian dollar, which is the rate used by the Company in its 2018 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings.
(2)
(1)Represents payout of a plant-wide quality and production bonus.one-time, special bonus paid to all global employees of the Company (other than the senior management team).
(2)Profit-sharing under the Company’s U.S. profit-sharing plan.
(3)Includes (a) a Company-matching contributioncontributions of $868 under$2,215 to the employee’s account under the Canadian subsidiary’sCompany’s ProsperityPlus 401(k) defined contribution savings plan,plan; (b) premiums totaling $898a premium of $51.12 paid by the Company with respect to life andor other insurance for the benefit of the employee or her beneficiaries designated by the employee; and (c) contributionsa taxable employee service award of $2,440 to maintain the employee in Canadian social programs, including state health and pension schemes, (d) premiums totaling $2,734 for supplemental health and dental plans for the benefit of employee and her family, (e) payment of a vacation premium of $3,811, and (f) a defined contribution pension contribution of $4,935.$213.

The ratio of the two amounts is 75.7:1.00.

74:1.


To perform this calculation, we started with the total number of employees working for the Company and its subsidiaries worldwide as of NovemberDecember 1, 2017;2020; we used our entire worldwide employee population and did not use statistical sampling. We then determined total compensation paid to each employee for all of 2017,2020, excluding only changes in value of any vested pension benefits, as we concluded that it would have been extremely burdensome to determine such changes for all employees. Each employee’s total compensation was then translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate applicable to each employee’s country of employment, as used by the Company in its 20172020 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings. On this basis, we determined that our median employee, for the purposes of this disclosure, was an hourly employee working at the Borne, Texas facility of our CanadianAlbany Engineered Composites subsidiary, in Perth, Ontario, who haddid not have a vesteddefined pension benefit.

     As is permitted by


29

Grants of Plan-Based Awards(1)
Name
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Nonequity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(3)
Grant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
All Other
Option
Awards: Number of
Securities or
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh)
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards(4)
($)
A. Williams Higgins2/20/20425,000850,0001,700,00011,39022,77945,5581,699,997
  
Stephen Nolan1/21/20750,000750,000750,000 
2/20/20190,750381,500763,0004,0178,03316,066 599,503
Daniel Halftermeyer2/20/20136,530273,060546,1202,8685,73511,470428,003
  
Greg Harwell2/20/20171,500343,000686,0003,4476,89413,788514,499
  
Alice McCarvill2/20/2089,874179,748359,4961,5363,1266,252233,293

(1)Mr. Jarrault was not granted any plan-based awards in 2020.
(2)The February awards represent the applicable regulations, we have determinedtarget cash amount established for each officer in early 2020 in the APP Performance Awards granted to that there has been no change in our employee population or compensation arrangements that we would expect to result in a significant change to this disclosure, and have therefore used this same employee asofficer under the comparator2017 Incentive Plan. The January award represents the cash retention bonus established for the purposesofficer pursuant to a Retention Bonus Agreement dated January 21, 2023.
(3)Awards represent the target share amount established for each officer in the MPP Performance Awards, granted to the officer under the 2017 Incentive Plan consisting of a target number of shares of Class A Common Stock.Each Performance Award entitled the NEO to receive from 50% (for attaining performance at the threshold level) to as much as 200% (for attaining performance at the maximum level) of such target, based on the extent to which he or she attained certain performance goals during the performance periods. The performance conditions at each of the threshold, target, and maximum levels in the Performance Awards granted to each of the NEOs are described above (see pp. 23).
The APP Performance Award agreements provide that a recipient whose employment terminated for any reason during 2020                          would not be entitled to any portion of the award. The MPP Performance Award agreements provide that a recipient whose     employment terminated for any reason during the three-year performance period would be entitled to a pro-rata portion of the foregoing awards. After 2020, the extent to which performance goals were attained under the APP Performance Award agreements was determined, and the actual number of shares awarded to each NEO is set forth in this disclosure. proxy statement in the table titled “Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year End” on page 32.
The above table sets forth her compensation during 2018 translated into U.S. dollars usingRetention Bonus Agreement provides that $250,000 of the Canadian exchange rate usedaward amount will vest and be paid to the officer on January         21 in each 2021, 2022 and 2023, provided the officer is still employed with the company. Should the officer’s employment terminate for any reason other than by the Company in its 2018 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings, including the changewithout Cause (as defined in the Retention Bonus Agreement), any unvested portion of the retention bonus shall be forfeited.

(4)     The grant date fair value of her pensionthe MPP Performance Award. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value         of the MPP Performance Award targets was determined to be the product of the target number of shares awarded multiplied by $74.63, the closing market price on February 20, 2020, the grant date of the Performance Awards, as it was expected that the probable outcome of the performance conditions would lead to the achievement of the target number of shares.


30

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Option AwardsStock Awards
Name
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Market
Value(1) of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market(1) or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
Olivier Jarrault———————18,984(2)1,393,805
———————21,670(3)1,591,011
A. William Higgins———————22,779(4)1,672,434
Stephen Nolan—————  8,033(4)589,783
———————6,285(5)461,445
2,844(6)208,806
Daniel Halftermeyer———————8,882(2)652,116
———————5,264(3)386,483
———————5,735(4)421,064
—————4,410(7)323,782——
Greg Harwell———————6,894(4)506,157
—————5,605(8)411,519——
Alice McCarvill———————2,610(3)191,626
———————3,126(4)229,511
—————2,254(9)165,4889——

(1)Based on closing market price on December 31, 2020, of $73.42.
(2)Represents the shares actually earned by the NEO with respect to the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2018 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. The shares were earned based on performance during 2018, excluding any cost-of-living2019 and 2020, and paid in 2021. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2020. As of January 1, 2021, 100% of the balance reported became vested, and these balances were distributed, in stock, on or annualization adjustments.

about March 1, 2021.In the case of Mr. Jarrault, the amount shown is after proration for service less than the entire performance period.

27 

(3)Represents the share target opportunity established in the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2019 under the 2017 Incentive Plan.This share target is earned based on performance during 2019, 2020, and 2021, and paid in 2022. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2020.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Nonequity Incentive Plan Awards(1)		Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)		 
NameGrant
Date		Threshold
($)		Target
($)		Maximum
($)		Threshold
(#)		Target
(#)		Maximum
(#)		All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)		All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities or
Underlying
Options
(#)		Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh)		Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards(5)
($)
Olivier Jarrault2/23/18387,500775,0001,550,00011,69823,39646,79223,567(3)  3,024,101
            
John B. Cozzolino2/23/18227,000454,000   908,000  3,902  7,80415,608      517,015
            
Daniel A. Halftermeyer2/23/18134,000268,000   536,000  3,402  6,08312,16612,853(3)  1,402,962
            
Robert A. Hansen2/22/18  65,500131,000   262,000     3,690(4)     246,308
            
Charles J. Silva, Jr.2/22/18  67,500135,000   270,000     1,892(4)     126,308

(1)Except for Messrs. Hansen and Silva, each award represents the target cash amount established for the officer in early 2018 in the APP Performance Awards granted to that officer under the 2017 Incentive Plan. For Messrs. Hansen and Silva, the amount represents their target cash bonus opportunity under the annual incentive plan.
(2)Awards represent the target share amount established for each officer in the MPP Performance Awards, consisting of a target number of shares of Class A Common Stock.
Each Performance Award entitled the NEO to receive from 50% (for attaining performance at the threshold level) to as much as 200% (for attaining performance at the maximum level) of such target, based on the extent to which he or she attained certain performance goals during the performance periods. The performance conditions at each of the threshold, target, and maximum levels in the Performance Awards granted to each of the NEOs are described above (see page 22). The APP Performance Award agreements provide that a recipient whose employment terminated for any reason during 2018 would not be entitled to any portion of the award. The MPP Performance Award agreements provide that a recipient whose employment terminated for any reason during the three-year performance period would be entitled to a pro-rata portion of the foregoing awards. After 2018, the extent to which performance goals were attained under the Performance Phantom Stock grants was determined, and the actual number of shares awarded to each NEO is set forth in this proxy statement in the table titled “OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END” on page 29.
(3)Awards made under the RSU Plan. Upon vesting, each RSU is paid in full in cash, in an amount equal to the average closing price of one share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock during a specified period preceding the vesting/payment date. In lieu of cash dividends, the holder of the RSUs is credited with additional RSUs equal to the number of shares of Class A Common Stock having the same value on the dividend payment date as the aggregate dividends that would be payable on shares of Class A Common Stock equal in number to the RSUs held by such holder.
(4)Awards made under the Phantom Stock Plan. Upon vesting, each phantom stock unit RSU is paid in full in cash, in an amount equal to the average closing price of one share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock during a specified period preceding the vesting/payment date. Dividends do not accrue to phantom stock units.
(5)Except for Messrs. Hansen and Mr. Silva, computed by adding grant date fair value of the MPP Performance Award, plus the grant date fair value of the RSU award, if any. The amount reported for Messrs. Hansen and Mr. Silva is the grant date fair value of his Performance Phantom Stock Award. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value of the MPP Performance Award targets and the Performance Phantom Stock Award targets denominated in shares, was determined to be the product of the target number of shares awarded multiplied by either (a) $66.75, the closing market price on February 22, 2018, the grant date of the Performance Phantom Stock Awards or (b) $66.25, the closing market price on February 23, 2018, the grant date of the Performance Awards, as it was expected that the probable outcome of the performance conditions would lead to the achievement of the target number of shares. The grant date fair value of the RSU awards were determined by the product of the number of units granted multiplied by either (1) $62.55, the closing market price on March 2, 2019, the grant date to Mr. Jarrault, or $77.80, the closing market price on August 28, 2018, the grant date to Mr. Halftermeyer.

28 

(4)Represents the share target opportunity established in the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2020 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. This share target is earned based on performance during 2020, 2021, and 2022, and paid in 2023. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2020. These awards are a part of those included in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 30.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

     Option Awards           Stock Awards    
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable		  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)		  Option
Exercise
Price ($)		  Option
Expiration
Date		  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)		  Market
Value(1)of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)		   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market(1)or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
                            
Joseph G. Morone —   —   —   —   —   —   —   18,420(2)  1,149,776 
  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   17,070(3)  1,065,509 
                            
Olivier Jarrault —   —   —   —   —   —   —   23,396(4)  1,460,378 
  —   —   —   —   —   23,747(5)  1,482,288   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —                 
                            
John Cozzolino —   —   —   —   —   —   —   7,595(2)  474,080 
  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   5,816(3)  363,035 
  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   7,804(4)  487,126 
  300   0   —   20.6300   11/7/2022   —   —   —   — 
                            
Daniel Halftermeyer —   —   —   —   —   —   —   7,870(2)  491,245 
  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   4,777(3)  298,180 
  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   6,083(4)  379,701 
  —   —   —   —   —   12,881(6)  804,032   —   — 
                            
Robert Hansen —   —   —   —   —   4,583(7,8)  286,071   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   3,533(7,9)  220,530   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   5,060(7,10)  315,845   —   — 
  200   0   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 
  450   0   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 
  600   0   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 
  1000   0   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 
                            
Charles J. Silva, Jr —   —   —   —   —   2,350(7,8)  146,687   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   1,766(7,9)  110,234   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   2,240(7,10)  139,821   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   1,205(7,11)  75,216   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   470(7,12)  29,337   —   — 
  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 

(1)Based on closing market price on December 31, 2018, of $62.42.
(2)Represents the shares actually earned by the NEO with respect to the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2016 under the 2011 Incentive Plan. These shares were earned based on performance during 2016, 2017 and 2018, and paid in 2019. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2018. As of January 1, 2019, 100% of the balance reported became vested, and these balances were distributed, in stock, on or about March 11, 2019.
(3)Represents the share target opportunity established in the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2017 under the 2011 Incentive Plan. This share target is earned based on performance during 2017, 2018 and 2019, and paid in 2020. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2018.
(4)Represents the share target opportunity established in the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2018 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. This share target is earned based on performance during 2018, 2019 and 2020, and paid in 2021. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2018. These awards are a part of those included in the “GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS” table on page 28.

29 

(5)Represents the share target opportunity in an Incentive Award granted to the NEO in 2019 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. The award is not performance based, and the shares are earned upon the NEO’s continued employment through March 31, 2022. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2019.

(6)Restricted Stock Units granted under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. One-half of the balance will vest and be payable on April 1 in each 2021 and 2022.
(5)Restricted Stock Units granted under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. One-third of the balance will vest and be payable on March 1 in each 2019, 2020, and 2021.
(6)Restricted Stock Units granted under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. One-third of the balance will vest and be payable on September 1 in each 2019, 2020, and 2021.
(7)Performance Phantom Stock granted under the Performance Stock Plan
(8)Represents shares actually earned by the NEO with respect to the Performance Phantom Stock Award granted in 2018 and based on 2018 performance. Although shares are not earned until January 1, 2019, the Company has determined to treat them as earned during 2018 and therefore outstanding at 2018 year-end solely for purposes of this disclosure. These awards are included in the “GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS” table on page 28. As of January 1, 2019, 100% of the balance reported became earned, and one-fifth of the balances will vest and become payable on March 15 in each 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.
(9)One-fourth of the balance reported will vest and be payable on March 15 in each 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
(10)One third of the balance reported will vest and be payable on March 15 in each 2019, 2020 and 2021.
(11)One-half of the balance reported will vest and be payable on March 15 in each 2019 and 2020.
(12)The balance reported vested and became payable on March 15, 2019.

(7)Restricted Stock Units granted under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. The balance will vest and be payable on September 1, 2021.
(8)Restricted Stock Units granted under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. Fifty-three percent (53%) of the balance reported will vest and be payable on November 4, 2021 and forty-seven (47%) will vest and be payable on November 4, 2022.
(9)Performance Phantom Stock granted under the Performance Stock Plan. One-third of the balance reported will vest and be payable on March 15 in each 2021, 2022 and 2023.

Description of Equity Awards


31

Equity awards referred to in the foregoing table include the following:


Stock Options.All of the options in the foregoing table were granted prior to 2002. Each option is fully vested and exercisable. The exercise price of each option is the fair market value of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the date of grant.


Restricted Stock Units.RSUs granted under the RSU Plan are, upon vesting, paid in full in cash, in an amount equal to the average closing price of one share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock during a specified period preceding the vesting/payment date. No shares of Class A Common Stock are issued or issuable under the RSU Plan. There is no exercise price. In lieu of cash dividends, a holder of RSUs is credited with additional RSUs equal to the number of shares of Class A Common Stock having the same value on the dividend payment date as the aggregate dividends that would be payable on shares of Class A Common Stock equal in number to the RSUs held by such holder. (The crediting of such dividends is reflected in the above table.) RSU awards generally vest as to 20% of the awarded units on each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant, but only if the holder is then employed by the Company or a subsidiary. However, differing vesting schedules are permitted under the terms of the RSU Plan and have been used in special circumstances; such was the case with thea special executive-retention or recruitment incentives granted toimplemented for certain key executives in 2018.from time to time. In the event of termination of employment, all unvested RSUs terminate without payment, except that in the case of voluntary termination after age 62, death, disability, or involuntary termination, one-half of all unvested RSUs automatically vest and are paid at termination.


Performance Phantom Stock.Grants under the Performance Phantom Stock plan are denominated as share targets, but no shares of Class A Common Stock are actually issued or issuable under the Plan, nor is there an exercise price. Instead, upon vesting, the earned shares are paid in full in cash, in an amount equal to the average closing price of one share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock during a specified period preceding the vesting/payment date. Each award entitles the recipient to earn and be credited with between 0% and 150% of the target award, based on the extent to which he or she attained certain performance goals during the annual performance period. Once the number of shares earned is determined, the awards generally vest as to 20% of the earned shares on the last day of February in each of the first five years following the performance period, but only if the holder is then employed by the Company or a subsidiary. Award recipients are not credited with additional shares based upon the payment of dividends. The performance period for the 20182020 grants runs from January 1, 20182020 through December 31, 2018,2020, and payout on earned shares runs through February 2023.

2025.


Performance-based Incentive Awards.The performance-based incentive awards described in the foregoing table were granted under the Company’s 2011 Incentive Plan or the 2017 Incentive Plan.

30 


Beginning in 2010, the performance-based incentive awards were structured in the form of the APP and MPP Performance Awards described above. Through 2017, these awards each established both share and cash targets, which are paid out as denominated when earned. However, beginning in 2018 The APP Performance Award is paid completely in cash and the MPP Performance Award is paid completely in equity. Beginning with the grants in 2021, the MPP Performance Award will still be settled in equity, but the grants shall be made 50% in performance shares and 50% in restricted stock.

An APP Performance Award is cancelled if the recipient’s employment is terminated for any reason during the performance period. If the employment is terminated after the performance period, but prior to distribution of the award, the recipient is entitled to receive 100% of the earned award on the distribution date provided his or her employment is not terminated for “cause.” A recipient whose employment is terminated for “cause” forfeits any payments not yet paid, unless the Committee or, if required, a Performance Committee of the Board determines otherwise in its absolute discretion. An MPP Performance Award is cancelled only in the event the recipient’s employment is terminated for “cause,” in which case he or she would not be entitled to any payments unless the Committee or a Performance Committee of the Board determines otherwise in its absolute discretion. In the event a recipient’s employment is terminated for any other reason, the MPP Performance Award is not cancelled but the vesting ceases as of the date of termination. The recipient would then be entitled to a pro-rata payment for the amount that vested. Such payment would be based on achievement of the performance goals at the end of the performance period and would be made on the distribution date established in the award.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

 Option AwardsStock Awards(1)Stock Awards
NameNumber
of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)		Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)		Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)		Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)		Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)		Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
       
Joseph G. Morone————26,721(2)1,660,710
 ————10,424(3)   647,852
       
John B. Cozzolino————  8,871(2)   551,333
 ————  2,972(3)   184,710
       
Daniel A. Halftermeyer————  8,738(2)   543,067
 ————  2,605(3)   161,901
       
Robert A. Hansen1506,3642,570161,602——
       
Charles J. Silva——2,924183,723——

32

Option Exercises and Stock Vested
Option AwardsStock AwardsStock Awards
Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)
Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
Olivier Jarrault——————
A. William Higgins——
Stephen Nolan——1,406(1)103,397——
Daniel A. Halftermeyer——4,380(1)225,3956,530(2)418,377
Greg Harwell——1,788(1)95,944——
Alice McCarvill——751(3)55,302——

(1)Vesting of Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Company’s Restricted Stock Unit Plan. Amounts reported as “Value Realized on Vesting” were distributed in cash to the NEO during 2020.
(2)Vesting of share target under the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2017 pursuant to the
2011 Incentive Plan Amounts reported as “Value Realized on Vesting” were distributed in stock to the NEO during 2020.
(3)Vesting of Performance Phantom Stock granted pursuant to the Company’s Performance Stock Plan. Amounts reported as “Value Realized on Vesting” were distributed in cash to the NEO during 2020.
Pension Benefits
(1)Vesting
Name(1)
Plan Name
Number
of Performance Phantom Stock granted pursuant to the Company’s Performance Stock Plan. Amounts reported as “Value Realized on Vesting” were distributed in cash to the NEO during 2018.Years
Credited
Service
(#)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
(2)Vesting of share target under the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2015 pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan Amounts reported as “Value Realized on Vesting” were distributed in stock to the NEO during 2018.
Daniel A. Halftermeyer(2)
—266,644—
(3)Vesting of share target under the APP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2017 pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plans. Amounts reported as “Value Realized on Vesting” were distributed in stock to the NEO during 2018.


(1)The Company’s PensionPlus Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan were closed to new employees, effective October 1, 1998. Messrs. Higgins, Jarrault, Nolan and Harwell, and Ms. McCarvill, all joined the Company after the plans were closed and have no reportable pension benefits. They are therefore omitted from the table.
(2)As a non-U.S. employee, Mr. Halftermeyer does not participate in the U.S. PensionPlus Plan, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or the Qualified Supplemental Retirement Plan. Instead, as Mr. Halftermeyer is a French citizen working for a company affiliate in Switzerland, the Company is required by Swiss law to maintain a private pension for his benefit. The private pension is purchased through an insurance company. The Company’s Swiss subsidiary is required to make defined premium contributions. The premium paid by the Company in 2020 was CHF 7,996 or $8,527 using the conversion rate of 1.06637 U.S. dollars per Swiss franc, which is the rate used by the Company in its 2020 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings. The policy was first purchased in 2007. The present value of the accumulated benefit is set forth in the table above (and has been translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.13317 U.S. dollars per Swiss Franc, which was the applicable conversion rate as of December 31,

2020). In addition, Mr. Halftermeyer continues to participate in a French state-mandated social scheme as an expatriate. The Company contributes both the employer’s and employee’s share of the legally required contribution under this scheme. In early 2020, the Company paid €92,568, or $105,673 using the conversion rate of 1.14157 U.S. dollars per euro, which is the rate used by the Company in its 2020 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings. This contribution covered the period from October 2019 through September 2020. Of this amount, approximately $29,726 was the employee’s required contribution, which the Company assumed as part of the international assignment.

PENSION BENEFITS

Name(1)Plan NameNumber
of Years
Credited
Service(2)
(#)		Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(3)
($)		Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
John B. CozzolinoPensionPlus14.75103,000—
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan———
 Qualified Supplemental Retirement Benefits—  34,000—
     
Daniel A. Halftermeyer(4)— 136,000—
     
Robert A. HansenPensionPlus27.67725,000—
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan———
 Qualified Supplemental Retirement Benefits———
     
Charles J. SilvaPensionPlus15.17304,000—
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan—  10,000—
 Qualified Supplement Retirement Benefits———

(1)The Company’s PensionPlus Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan were closed to new employees, effective October 1, 1998. Dr. Morone and Mr. Jarrault, who both joined the Company after the plans were closed, have no reportable pension benefits and are omitted from the table.
(2)Where noted, credited service is the same as actual service through February 28, 2009.
(3)Except for Mr. Halftermeyer, the values of the pension benefits reported above are the present values of benefits expected to be paid in the future. The actuarial assumptions used to determine these values are the same as are used in the Company’s financial statements, except that the assumed retirement age for purposes of this table is the earliest unreduced retirement age as defined in the relevant plan. Present values are determined as of the Company’s measurement date for pension purposes (December 31, 2018). (Reference is made to Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 for a discussion of these assumptions.) Each amount assumes that the form of payment will be a single life annuity.
(4)As a non-U.S. employee, Mr. Halftermeyer does not participate in the U.S. PensionPlus Plan, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or the Qualified Supplemental Retirement Plan. Instead, as Mr. Halftermeyer is a French citizen working for a company affiliate in Switzerland, the Company is required by Swiss law to maintain a private pension for his benefit. The private pension is purchased through an insurance company. The Company’s Swiss subsidiary is required to make defined premium contributions. The premium paid by the Company in 2018 was CHF 7,663 or $7,853 using the conversion rate of 1.02247 U.S. dollars per Swiss franc, which is the rate used by the Company in its 2018 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings. The policy was first purchased in 2007. The present value of the accumulated benefit is set forth in the table above (and has been translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.01622 U.S. dollars per Swiss Franc, which was the applicable conversion rate as of December 31, 2018). In addition, Mr. Halftermeyer continues to participate in a French state-mandated social scheme as an expatriate. The Company contributes both the employer’s and employee’s share of the legally required contribution under this scheme. In early 2018, the Company paid €94,977, or $112,146 using the conversion rate of 1.18085 U.S. dollars per euro, which is the rate used by the Company in its 2018 Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings. This contribution covered the period from October 2017 through September 2018. Of this amount, approximately $40,361 was the employee’s required contribution, which the Company assumed as part of the international assignment.

32 


PensionPlus Plan.The Company’s U.S. PensionPlus Plan, applicable to all salaried and most hourly employees in the United States who began employment on or before October 1, 1998, provides generally that an employee who retires at his or her normal retirement age (age 65) will receive a maximum annual pension equal to the sum of (a) 1% of his or her average annual base compensation for the three most highly compensated consecutive calendar years in his or her last ten years of employment (the “High Three Average”) times his or her years of service (up to 30) before April 1, 1994; plus (b) 0.5% of the amount by which his or her High Three Average exceeds a Social Security offset ($41,623 in 2009) times his or her years of service (up to 30) before March 31,

33

1994; plus (c) 1% of his or her High Three Average times years of service (up to 30) between March 31, 1994, and January 1, 1999; plus (d) 0.75% of such High Three average times years of service (up to 30) after December 31, 1998; plus (e) 0.25% of such High Three Average times years of service in excess of 30. The Plan was amended effective February 28, 2009, to freeze the accrual of any new benefits. As a result, no participant has accrued any additional pension creditable service after that date, and the High Three Average is now determined in reference to the last ten years of employment prior to February 28, 2009.


Annual base compensation in any year used to determine a participant’s High Three Average is the rate of base earnings of such participant as of January 1 of such year. It does not include other cash compensation (such as annual cash bonuses) or noncash compensation.


Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code places certain limitations on pensions that may be paid under federal income tax qualified plans. Section 401 of the Code also limits the amount of annual compensation that may be used to calculate annual benefits under such plans. The effect of such limits is reflected in the amounts reported as the present value of benefits accumulated under the PensionPlus Plan.


The PensionPlus Plan permits early retirement at or after age 55 with at least ten years of service. Of the NEOs who participate in the Plan, only Messrs. Hansen and Mr. Silva are eligible for retirement under the PensionPlus Plan. In general, provided that payment of benefits does not commence until the normal retirement age of 65, the pension of a participant retiring early will be calculated in the same manner as described above, taking into account years of service up to February 28, 2009, and such participant’s High Three Average prior to that date. A participant eligible for early retirement may also elect to commence benefits on or after his or her early retirement date and prior to age 65 in an amount that is the actuarial equivalent of his or her normal retirement benefit.


Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.The Company’s unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is intended to replace any PensionPlus benefits that a participant is prevented from receiving by reason ofdue to the Section 415 limits on pensions or the Section 401 limits on annual compensation used to calculate PensionPlus benefits. All plan participants affected by such limitations are eligible to receive benefits under the unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. In other words, the pension formula described above is used to determine aggregate benefits under both plans — the portion that is not payable under the PensionPlus Plan due to the foregoing limits is payable under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The allocation is made on the basis of IRS regulations in effect on the valuation date. The Executive Retirement Plan was also amended effective February 28, 2009 to freeze the accrual of any new benefits.


Qualified Supplemental Retirement Benefits.Certain employees of the Company who were active on June 30, 2002, are entitled to receive additional qualified supplemental retirement (“QSR”) benefits under the PensionPlus Plan. On June 30, 2002, each covered employee was credited with an initial account balance in a specified amount. Each such participant had participated in deferred compensation plans maintained by the Company on or before such time, pursuant to which he or she could defer the receipt of earned cash compensation until retirement or other events. Amounts deferred earned interest at rates approved from time to time by the Compensation Committee. In each case, the amount initially credited to such employee’s QSR account was equal to an amount of deferred compensation (including interest) to which he or she was entitled but which he or she agreed to renounce. Each QSR account is credited with interest at 8.5% annually until retirement, at which time the QSR account value is payable in the form of an actuarially equivalent single life annuity or, at the election of the participant, in a single lump sum.


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

There were no executive or Company contributions, or interest or other earnings, during 20182020 under any defined contribution or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified, nor did any NEO receive any withdrawals or distributions during, or have any account as of the end of, 2018.

33 

2020.


Plan-based Compensation


Stock Options.There were no unexercisable options as of December 31, 20182020 that would become exercisable upon the involuntary termination or retirement of any NEO.


Restricted Stock, Phantom Stock and Performance-based Awards.The following chart indicates what the effect on RSUs, Phantom Stock and earned performance-based incentive awards in the accounts of each NEO would have been upon the occurrence of (a) termination of employment involuntarily on December 31, 2018,2020, without cause, or (b) in the case of any NEO who had attained age 62 at the time, a voluntary or involuntary termination of employment on such date, without cause. (All of these awards are reported in the table entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” on page 29.31.)

NameNumber of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)		Number of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Would Vest Upon
Such Termination
(#)		Value of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Would Vest Upon
Such Termination(1)
($)
    
Olivier Jarrault23,396(2)7,798(3)486,744
 23,747(4)11,874       741,144
    
John B. Cozzolino  7,804(2)2,601(3)162,359
   5,816(5)3,878(6)242,035
   7,595(7)7,595     474,080
    
Daniel A. Halftermeyer  6,083(2)2,027(3)126,554
 12,881(4)6,441     402,016
   4,777(5)3,185(6)198,797
   7,870(7)7,870     491,245
    
Robert A. Hansen  8,593(8)4,297     268,188
   4,583(9)2,292     143,035
    
Charles J. Silva  5,681(8)2,841     177,304
   2,350(9)1,175       73,344
 Mr. Jarrault is omitted from this table because he had already left the Company prior to December 31, 2020.

34
(1)Based on the closing market price on December 31, 2018 of $62.42.
(2)Represents the number of shares established as the target share opportunity in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2018

Name
Number of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)
Number of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Would Vest Upon
Such Termination
(#)
Value of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Would Vest Upon
Such Termination(1)
($)
A. Williams Higgins22,779(2)7,592(3)557,442  
Stephen Nolan8,033(2)2,677(3)196,575
2,844(4)1,422  104,403  
6,285(5)0  0  
Daniel Halftermeyer5,735(2)1,911(3)140,341  
4,410(4)2,205 161,891  
5,264(6)3,510(7)257,668  
8,882(8)8,882  652,116  
Greg Harwell6,894(2)2,298(3)168,702
5,605(4)2,802  205,686
Alice McCarvill3,126(2)1,042  76,496  
2,610(6)1,740(7)127,757
2,254(9)1,127 82,744  

(1)Based on the closing market price on December 31, 2020 of $73.42.
(2)Represents the number of shares established as the target share opportunity in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2020 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. This target share award is earned based on performance during 2018, 2019 and 2020, and paid in 2021. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2018.
(3)Represents one-third of the target share award in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2018 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. Although not earned as of December 31, 2018, the award vests pro rata on a daily basis during the three-year performance period. Thus, in the event of termination for any reason other than for cause, this award would not be canceled. Instead, the NEO would be entitled to a payout in 2021 and 2022, and paid in 2023. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2019.
(3)Represents one-third of the target share award in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2020 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. Although not earned as of December 31, 2020, the award vests pro rata on a daily basis during the three-year performance period. Thus, in the event of termination for any reason other than for cause, this award would not be canceled. Instead, the NEO would be entitled to a payout in 2023 of the shares vested through the date of termination, adjusted to reflect the level of achievement of the performance goals. For the purpose of this disclosure, the Company has assumed 100% achievement of the three-year performance goal and termination as of December 31, 2018.
(4)RSUs granted under the RSU Plan in connection with a special executive retention incentive implemented in 2018. For these grants, amounts shown as vesting upon termination are payable at such time, in cash.
(5)Represents the number of shares established as the target share opportunity in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2017 under the 2011 Incentive Plan. This target share award is earned based on performance during 2017, 2018 and 2019, and paid in 2020. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2018.
(6)Represents two-thirds of the target share award in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2017 under the 2011 Incentive Plan. Although not earned as of December 31, 2018, the award vests pro rata on a daily basis during the three-year performance period. Thus, in the event of termination for any reason other than for cause, this award would not be canceled. Instead, the NEO would be entitled to a payout in 2020 of the share that vested through the date of termination, adjusted to reflect the level of achievement of the

34 

performance goals. For the purpose of this disclosure, the Company has assumed 100% achievement of the three-year performance goal and termination as of December 31, 2018.

(7)Represents the number of shares actually earned pursuant to the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2016 under the 2011 Incentive Plan based on performance during 2016, 2017 and 2018. The award vested pro rata on a daily basis during the three-year performance period. Thus, in the event the NEO had been terminated for any reason other than for cause on December 31, 2018, the NEO would nevertheless have been entitled to a payout in 2019 of the shares set forth.
(8)Performance Phantom Stock granted under the Performance Stock Plan prior to 2018. For these grants, amounts shown as vesting upon termination are payable at such time, in cash.
(9)Represents the number of shares of Phantom Stock actually earned pursuant to a grant under the Performance Stock Plan made in 2018. For these grants, amounts shown as vesting upon termination are payable at such time, in cash.

2020.

(4)RSUs granted under the RSU Plan in connection with a special executive retention incentive. For these grants, amounts shown as vesting upon termination are payable at such time, in cash.
(5)Represents the number of shares established as a target opportunity in an Incentive Award granted to the NEO in 2019 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. The award is not performance based, and only requires the NEO’s continued employment through March 31, 2022. If employment terminates for any reason before then, the award never vests and is forfeited.
(6)Represents the number of shares established as the target share opportunity in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2019 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. This target share award is earned based on performance during 2019, 2020 and 2021, and paid in 2022. None of the balance reported was earned as of December 31, 2020.
(7)Represents two-thirds of the target share award in the NEO’s MPP Performance Award granted in 2019 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. Although not earned as of December 31, 2020, the award vests pro rata on a daily basis during the three-year performance period. Thus, in the event of termination for any reason other than for cause, this award would not be canceled. Instead, the NEO would be entitled to a payout in 2022 of the shares that vested through the date of termination, adjusted to reflect the level of achievement of the performance goals. For the purpose of this disclosure, the Company has assumed 100% achievement of the three-year performance goal and termination as of December 31, 2020.
(8)Represents the number of shares actually earned pursuant to the MPP Performance Award granted to the NEO in 2018 under the 2011 Incentive Plan based on performance during 2018, 2019, and 2020. The award vested pro rata on a daily basis during the three-year performance period. Thus, in the event the NEO had been terminated for any reason other than for cause on December 31, 2020, the NEO would nevertheless have been entitled to a payout in 2021 of the shares set forth.
(9)Performance Phantom Stock granted under the Performance Phantom Stock Plan prior to 2019. For these grants, amounts shown as vesting upon termination are payable at such time, in cash.


35

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control


Termination/Severance


Mr. Jarrault

Higgins


The Committee believes that under certain circumstances, severance agreements are appropriate for the attraction and retention of executive talent, consistent with the practices of peer companies. This was particularly true in the case of Mr. Jarrault.Higgins. The Committee felt a severance provision was warranted in order to induce Mr. JarraultHiggins to leave his position as Chairman of the Board of Directors to become the Company’s CEO. His employment agreement (see page 21)23) provides that in the event his employment is terminated for any reason, he would be entitled to: (a) any unpaid base salary accrued to the effective date of termination; (b) any unpaid but earned and accrued annual cash bonus for the portion of the year in which the termination of employment occurred, and for any completed prior year for which the annual cash bonus has not been paid; (c) benefits or compensation required to be provided after termination pursuant to, and in accordance with the terms of, any employee benefit plans, policies, or arrangements applicable to him; (d) any unreimbursed business expenses incurred prior to termination and required to be reimbursed pursuant to the Company’s policy; and (e) any rights to indemnification to which he may be entitled under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or By Laws. In addition, in the case of termination by the Company without Cause, or if the Mr. Jarrault’sHiggins’ employment is terminated by himself for Good Cause, he would be entitled to receive an amount equal to twice his annual base salary at the time of termination plus twice his APP Performance Award target amount, payable in 24 equal monthly installments. His right to receive these additional severance payments would be contingent upon his continuing compliance with confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in the agreement, and upon his having executed and delivered to the Company a release of any and all claims relating to his termination. For purposes of the agreement, “Cause”“cause” would be deemed to exist upon any of the following, if determined by a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors in their sole discretion: (i) the indictment of Mr. JarraultHiggins for, or the entry of a plea of guilty ornolo contendereby him to, a felony charge or any crime involving moral turpitude; (ii) unlawful conduct on his part that could reasonably be considered to reflect negatively on the Company or compromise the effective performance of his duties as determined by the Board in its sole discretion; (iii) willful misconduct on his part in connection with his duties or willful failure to use reasonable effort to perform substantially his responsibilities in the best interest of the Company (including, without limitation, breach by his employment agreement), except in cases involving mental or physical incapacity or disability; (iv) his willful violation of the Company’s Business Ethics Policy, Code of Ethics or any other Company policy that could reasonably be considered to reflect negatively on the Company or compromise the effective performance of his duties as determined by the Board in its sole discretion; (v) fraud, material dishonesty, or gross misconduct in connection with the Company perpetrated by him; (vi) his undertaking of a position or any activity in or in furtherance of competition with Company during his employment with the Company;Company Term; (vii) his having caused substantial harm to the Company with intent to do so or as a result of gross negligence in the performance of his duties; or (viii) his having wrongfully and substantially enriched himself at the expense of the Company. And, also for the purposes of the Agreement, “Good Cause” for termination would exist as a consequence of , and following: (i) a material adverse change in his authority and responsibilities without his consent, (ii) a material reduction in his compensation, not proportionally and similarly affecting other senior executives, without his consent, (iii) the failure of the Company or any successor to fully honor the terms of any contractual agreements with him, or (iv) a Change in Control (as defined in the agreement);provided,,that,, in the case of (i), (ii) or (iii), Mr. JarraultHiggins would first be required to deliver written notice to the Company of his intention

35 

to terminate his employment for Good Cause within 90 days of the event or events constituting Good Cause, which said notice must specifyspecifying in reasonable detail the circumstances claimed to give rise to the his right to terminate employment for Good Cause, whichand the Company doeshaving not curehave cured such circumstances within 30 days following receipt of such notice. There was no sunset included in the severance provision of Mr. Jarrault’sHiggins’s contract when it was negotiated, drafted and executed. The Committee is aware of this fact but no action was contemplated to incorporate such a provision. The industries in which the Company competes continue to undergo significant changes to which the Company must be responsive. The Company believes that it is important to shareholder value that its CEO leads the Company’s response to those changes without concern for the impact on his or her specific position.


Other Executive Officers

     As of January 1, 2016,


It is the Company enteredCompany’s practice to enter into Severance Agreementsseverance agreements with each of the Company’s executive officers, other than the CEO, and severalcertain other senior managers. These agreements were meant to replace similar agreements expiring December 31, 2015, and were revised and updated to conform to then-current best practices. The material terms of the Severance Agreementsseverance agreements provide that in the event an officer’s employment is terminated by the Company at any time before the expiration of the applicable Severance Agreementseverance agreement for any reason other than Cause, or if the officer’s employment is terminated by the officer for Good Cause (as those terms are defined in the Severance Agreement,agreement, and in either case, a “Qualifying Termination”), the officer would be entitled to receive his or her gross monthly base salary in effect at the time of the Qualifying Termination, less applicable withholdings and deductions, for a period of 24 months. In the event the Qualifying Termination occurs within 12 months of a Change in Control (as defined in the Severance Agreement)agreement) the officer would be entitled to receive his or her gross monthly base salary in effect at the time of the Qualifying Termination, less applicable withholdings and deductions, for a period of 36 months, although in that case some of the monthly payments would be accelerated and paid as a lump sum to comply with applicable tax laws. The officer would also remain eligible for a prorated payment of any bonus earned, if any, during the year in which the Qualifying Termination occurs, and 12 months of executive outplacement services. In addition, if elected, the Company would pay the required premium to continue healthcare coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus
36

Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”). In order to receive the severance benefits, the officer would obligated to execute a release in favor of the Company at the time of termination which would also bind the officer to a restrictive covenant for the period during which the severance benefits are being paid. The initial term of each Severance Agreementagreement is typically three years, but each will thereafter automatically renew for one-year periods unless the Company timely notifies the executive of its intent not to renew. For the purposes of such agreements, cause is deemed to exist upon (i) the conviction of the executive for, or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere by the executive to, a felony charge or any crime involving moral turpitude; (ii) unlawful conduct on the part of the executive that may reasonably be considered to reflect negatively on the Company or compromise the effective performance of the executive’s duties as determined by the Company in its sole discretion; (iii) the executive’s willful misconduct in connection with his or her duties or willful failure to use reasonable effort to perform substantially his or her responsibilities in the best interest of the Company; (iv) the executive’s willful violation of the Company’s Business Ethics Policy or any other Company policy that may reasonably be considered to reflect negatively on the Company or compromise the effective performance of the executive’s duties as determined by the Company in its sole discretion; (v) fraud, material dishonesty, or gross misconduct in connection with the Company perpetrated by the executive; (vi) the executive undertaking a position in competition with the Company; (vii) the executive having caused substantial harm to the Company with intent to do so or as a result of gross negligence in the performance of his or her duties; or (viii) the executive having wrongfully and substantially enriched himself or herself at the expense of the Company. The Severance Agreementsagreements also contain a clawback provision which provides that an executive would forfeit any unpaid severance due pursuant to the agreement and would be required, upon demand, to repay any severance already paid if, after the executive’s termination: (i) there is a significant restatement of the Company’s financial results, caused or substantially caused by the fraud or intentional misconduct of the executive; (ii) the executive breaches any provision of the agreement, including, without limitation, the restrictive covenants, confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions; or (iii) the Company discovers conduct by the executive that would have permitted termination for cause, provided that such conduct occurred prior to the executive’s termination.


Mr. Nolan and Ms. McCarvill entered into severance agreements with the above terms when they joined the Company. Mr. Harwell entered into a similar agreement in February 2021.

The Committee considers severance to serve as a bridge in the event employment is involuntarily terminated without cause. Therefore, the foregoing Severance Periods were deemed to be appropriate in light of the perceived length of time it could take for the affected executive to find an equivalent position. At the time the agreements were approved, the Committee determined that individual executive agreements were superior to an all-inclusive

36 

policy because they provided more flexibility to address each officer’s situation, and his or her individual perceived importance to the Company and its strategies. It was further determined that the provision of a severance agreement would allow each executive to focus on the needs of the business without concern for his or her own position.


Except as set forth above, the Company has not entered into any other agreement, contract, plan, or arrangement, written or unwritten, to provide payment to any NEO in connection with his retirement, severance, termination or separation.


Change in Control


Other than the provisions found in the RSU and Phantom Stock Plan, which are applicable to all employees who receive an award under those plans, and the severance agreements described above, the Company has no contract, agreement, plan, or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that would provide for payment to an NEO at, following, or in connection with a change in control of the Company. The provisions of the RSU and Phantom Stock Plans provide that in the event of termination following a change of control, 100% of an award recipient’s unvested grant shall become immediately payable in full.

37


ITEM 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, and the related “say-on-pay” rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company is asking stockholders to vote on the compensation provided to our NEOs, as described in the preceding sections of this proxy statement.


Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders approve such compensation by approving the following advisory resolution:


RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.


This vote is nonbinding. Although it may not be possible to discern the specific concerns of stockholders that may cause them to cast a negative vote, the Board and the Compensation Committee have in prior years considered the vote, and communications received from holders explaining their voting decisions, as meaningful to the process of determining how Company’s executive officers should be compensated.


As described in detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, our compensation programs are designed to motivate our NEOs, and other members of management, to manage the Company so that it achieves superior performance and delivers value to our stockholders. We believe that our compensation program, with its balance of short-term cash incentives and long-term incentives (including equity-based awards that vest over multiple years), rewards sustained performance that is aligned with delivering consistent value to our stockholders. Stockholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR”
THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



38

37 


OTHER INFORMATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

     It is the goal


Share Ownership

As of the Company to set directors’ fees atclose of business on March 1, 2021, each of the directors, director nominees, and Named Executive Officers, and all current directors and officers as a competitive levelgroup, beneficially owned shares of our capital stock as follows:
Shares of
Class A
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned(a)
Percent of
Outstanding
Class A
Common Stock
Shares of
Class B
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percent of
Outstanding
Class B
Common Stock
Christine L. Standish1,623,710 (b)5.02%1,616,744(c)99.92%
Erland E. Kailbourne42,380(d)——
John F. Cassidy, Jr.23,624(d)——
John B. Scannell15,493(d)——
Katharine L. Plourde11,935(d)——
A. William Higgins6,739(d)——
Kenneth W. Krueger6,725(d)——
Daniel Halftermeyer91,655 (d)——
Oliver Jarrault10,851 (d)——
Lee C. Wortham4,407(d)——
Mark J. Murphy3,900(d)——
J. Michael McQuade879(d)——
Stephen M. Nolan6,285(e)(d)——
All officers and directors as a group
 (18 persons)
1,871,325 5.781,616,74499.92%
(a)Because shares of Class B Common Stock are convertible at any time into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, they are reflected in the above table both as Class B shares beneficially owned and as Class A shares beneficially owned. “Beneficial ownership” has the meaning specified under Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act.
(b)Includes (i) 6,966 shares owned directly and (ii) 1,616,744 shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” on page 41 for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of the Class B shares.
(c)
Includes (i) 100 shares owned directly and (ii) 1,616,644 shares owned or controlled by J. S. Standish Company. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” on page 41 for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares.
(d)Ownership is less than 1%.
(e)Shares issuable on April 1, 2022 subject to continued employment.

Each of the individuals named in the preceding table has sole voting and investment power over shares listed as beneficially owned, except as indicated. Each of the directors and officers whose share ownership is reported above has indicated that will enableno such shares are pledged as security.

The following persons have informed us that they were the beneficial owners of more than five percent of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock:


39

5% Beneficial Owners of Class A Common Stock
Name(s)(a)
Reported Shares of
Company’s Class A
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned*
Percent of
Outstanding
Class A
Common Stock
J. S. Standish Company1,616,644(b)5.00%
John C. Standish1,617,382 (c)5.00%
Christine L. Standish1,623,710 (d)5.02%
BlackRock, Inc.4,602,271(e)14.98%
The Vanguard Group3,239,393(f)10.54%
EARNEST Partners, LLC2,386,946(g)7.77%
Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC1,617,398(h)5.26%
*As of December 31, 2020, except for the J. S. Standish Company, John C. Standish, Christine L. Standish, whose holdings are shown as of March 1, 2021.
(a)Addresses of the beneficial owners listed in the above table are as follows: Christine L. Standish, John C. Standish, J. S. Standish Company, c/o Barrantys LLC, 120 W. Tupper Street, Buffalo, New York 14201; BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022; and The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355; EARNEST Partners, LLC, 1180 Peachtree NE, Suite 2300, Atlanta, GA 30309; and Kayne ANderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC, 1800 Avenue of the Stars, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067.
(b)Represents shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock” on page 41 below.
(c)Represents (i) 638 shares held by Mr. Standish directly or in his account in the Company’s 401(k) retirement savings and employee stock ownership plans, and (ii) 1,616,744 shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock” on page 41 for a description of the nature of Mr. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares.
(d)Represents (i) 6,966 shares held by Ms. Standish directly, and (ii) 1,616,744 shares issuable upon conversion of an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock. See “5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock” on page 41 below for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares.
(e)Represents shares beneficially owned by BlackRock, Inc. and one or more affiliates, including BlackRock Fund Advisors. BlackRock, Inc. and/or one or more of such entities has the sole power to vote or direct the vote of 4,559,687 such shares, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all such shares.
(f)Represents shares reported as beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, in its capacity as investment adviser. The Vanguard Group has shared voting power as to 63,570 such shares, shared dispositive power with respect to 89,139 such shares, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 3,150,254 such shares.
(g)Represents shares beneficially owned by EARNEST Partners, LLC in its capacity as investment adviser. EARNEST Partners, LLC has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 1,695,580 such shares, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all such shares.
(h)Represents shares beneficially owned by Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC., in its capacity as an investment adviser. Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC has sole power to vote or direct the vote, and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,107,931 such shares, and shared power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 509,467 such shares.



40

The following persons have informed the Company to attract and retain talented, well-qualified directors. Effective May 2018,that they are the Board, upon the recommendationbeneficial owners of the Compensation Committee (and with the approvalmore than five percent of the Company’s stockholders for that portion which is paid inoutstanding shares of Class B Common Stock as of March 1, 2021:

5% Beneficial Owners of Class B Common Stock
Name(s)(a)
Shares of
Company’s Class B
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Percent of
Outstanding
Class B
Common Stock
John C. Standish1,616,744(b)99.92%
Christine L. Standish1,616,744(c)99.92%
J. S. Standish Company1,616,644(d)99.92%
Standish Family Holdings, LLC1,447,52789.46%
(a)Addresses of the beneficial owners listed in the above table are as follows: John C. Standish, Christine L. Standish, J. S. Standish Company and Standish Family Holdings, LLC, c/o Barrantys LLC, 120 West Tupper Street, Buffalo, NY 14201.
(b)Includes (i) 1,447,527 shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC, and (ii) 169,117 shares held directly by J. S. Standish Company. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” below for a description of the nature of Mr. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 100 shares held directly.
(c)Includes (i) 1,447,527 shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC, and (ii) 169,117 shares held directly by J. S. Standish Company. See “Voting Power of the Standish Family” below for a description of the nature of Ms. Standish’s beneficial ownership of these shares. Also includes 100 shares held directly.
(d)Includes (i) 1,447,527 shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC, and (ii) 169,117 shares held directly. J. S. Standish Company, as manager, has sole voting and investment control over the shares held by Standish Family Holdings, LLC.

Voting Power of the Standish Family

The J. S. Standish Company now holds or controls, in the aggregate, shares entitling it to cast approximately 34.5% of the combined votes entitled to be cast by all stockholders of the Company. Christine L. Standish and Lee C. Wortham each serve as officers and directors of the J. S. Standish Company.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and any persons holding more than 10% of our Class A Common Stock)Stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports disclosing their initial ownership of the Company’s equity securities, as well as subsequent reports disclosing changes in such ownership. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on benchmark data provideda review of such reports furnished to us and written representations by PMP, approvedsuch persons that no other reports were required, all persons who were subject to the following compensation for directors:

An annual cash retainerreporting requirements of $70,000;Section 16(a) complied with such requirements during the year ended December 31, 2020.
An additional annual cash retainer for the Chairman
Shareholder communications. It is our policy to forward to each member of the Board of $60,000;
An additional annual cash retainer for the Vice Chairman ofDirectors any communications addressed to the Board of $35,000;Directors as a group, and to forward to each director any communication addressed specifically to such director. Such communications may be sent to: Albany International Corp., 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867.
An annual cash retainer
Available Information. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Business Ethics Policy, and Code of Ethics for the ChairsChief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller, and the charters of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees of $20,000, $15,000, and $10,000, respectively;
An annual cash retainer for the members of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees of $10,000, $7,500 and $5,000, respectively; and
An annual equity grant, which will be paid 100% in the form of Class A Common Stock and will have a fair market value of $90,000 at the date of grant.

     Directors serving for only a portion of the year receive a pro-rated portion of their applicable compensation. Cash retainer fees are paid in four equal quarterly installments; the annual equity grant is paid shortly after the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to each member who served on the Board during the year in which the meeting was held. A director whose final term ends at the Annual Meeting, or any director first elected at the Annual Meeting, receives one-half of the share retainer; directors elected otherwise than at an Annual Meeting receive a pro-rated portion of the equity grant at the time of appointment. Christine Standish, who holds shares well in excess of the Board’s share ownership guidelines, may elect to receive cash in lieu of the annual equity grant. Any director may also elect to receive all or any part of his or her annual cash retainer in shares of Class A Common Stock.

     All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with such services. In addition, the Company provides travel and liability insurance to all directors.

Director Pension.Each person who was a member of the Board of Directors on January 12, 2005, who was elected as a director prior to August 9, 2000, and who is not eligible to receive a pension under any other Company retirement program is, following (i) the termination of his or her service as a director and (ii) the attainment by such director of the age of 65, entitled to receive an annual pension in the amount of $20,000, payable in quarterly installments until the earlier of (a) the expiration of a period equal to the number of full years that such person served as a director prior to May 31, 2001, or (b) the death of such person. Directors Christine Standish and Erland Kailbourne are the only current directors so eligible.

Share Ownership Guidelines.The Board has adopted share ownership guidelines for its members. Under these guidelines, directors are generally expected to retain ownership of shares of Common Stock awarded or acquired until an ownership equal to three (3) times the annual cash and stock retainer is attained.

Meeting and Other Fees.Prior to May 2018, Directors received cash fees of $750 for each special meeting of the Board or any Board Committee that was designated as a telephone meeting. During 2018, one Board meeting, two Compensation Committee meetings and one Governance Committee meeting were so designated. Directors were also entitled to receive cash fees of $1,500 for each special meeting of the Board, and $1,000 for each special meeting of a Committee they attended in person or by telephone. There were no such meetings during 2018. Directors were also entitled to receive $1,500 for each day that they are engaged in Company business (other than attendance at Board or Committee meetings)all available at the request of the Chairman of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer.

38 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

NameFees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)		Stock
Awards(1)
($)		Option
Awards
($)		Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)		Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)		All Other
Compensation		Total
($)
        
Christine L. Standish166,500———  1,056(2)—167,556
        
Erland E. Kailbourne  71,012159,988————231,000
        
John C. Standish100,125———(33,000)(3)—  67,125
        
John F. Cassidy, Jr.  93,018  89,982————183,000
        
Edgar G. Hotard  79,518  89,982————169,500
        
John R. Scannell  77,893  89,982————167,875
        
Katherine L. Plourde  96,518  89,982————186,500
        
Joseph G. Morone————  (6,740)(2)— 
        
A. William Higgins  87,268  89,982————177,250
        
Kenneth W. Krueger  79,518  89,982————169,500
        
Lee C. Wortham  58,154  67,471————125,625

(1)As these are payments of shares, and not stock “awards,” there are no amounts deemed “outstanding” at the end of 2018.
(2)Increase/(decrease) during 2018 in the actuarial present value of the director’s accumulated benefit under the director pension plan described in the narrative preceding this table.
(3)Increase/(decrease) during 2018 in the actuarial percent value of Mr. Standish’s accumulated benefit under the Company’s U.S. defined benefit plan.

39 

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     The Audit Committee appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as auditors of the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, and to perform the reviews of the financial statements to be included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during that period.

     As stated in the Audit Committee Report on page 9, the Audit Committee has received the communications related to KPMG’s independence required by applicable PCAOB rules, has discussed with KPMG its independence, and has considered whether the provision of the services referred to below under “All Other Fees” is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG. In accordance with its charter, the Committee has also reviewed KPMG’s report describing (1) its internal quality-control procedures, (2) any material issues raised in any recent internal review, peer review, or review by any government or professional authorities (such as the PCAOB) of one or more independent audits conducted by KPMG, and (3) any steps taken by KPMG to deal with any issues raised in such reviews.

     Although current law, rules, and regulations, as well as the charter of the Audit Committee, require the Audit Committee to appoint, terminate, oversee and evaluate the performanceCorporate Governance section of the Company’s independent auditor, the Board considers the selection of the independent auditor to be an important matter of stockholder concern and is submitting the selection of KPMG for ratification by stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting by the shares present in person or by proxy is required to approve the ratification of the selection of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor. A representative from KPMG is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

     The Audit Committee does not expect to take action with respect to the appointment of auditors to audit the financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2019 until the second half of this year, and may issue requests to KPMG and other audit firms for proposals, which the Committee will review before making any appointment. The Audit Committee also reserves the right to appoint, reappoint, retain, or replace our auditors at any time, even after an appointment has been ratified by the stockholders. The stockholder vote on this proposal is advisory and nonbinding, and serves only as a recommendation to the Board of Directors. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of our auditors, the Audit Committee will consider such voting results with respect to any appointment.

Audit Fees

     The aggregate fees billed by or agreed to with KPMG for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q, and services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $2,740,000 in 2018 and $2,971,000 in 2017.

Audit-related Fees

     The aggregate fees billed by KPMG for assurance or related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s annual financial statements, including benefit plans, were $87,000 in 2018 and $85,000 in 2017.

Tax Fees

     The aggregate fees billed by KPMG for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $183,867 in 2018 and $219,376 in 2017. Billings were primarily for assistance in the preparation of tax returns and filings, assistance in connection with tax audits, tax advice in connection with corporate and business restructuring activities, and general tax advice.

All Other Fees

     KPMG did not bill for any other products or services not described above in 2018 or 2017.

Preapproval Policy

     It is the responsibility of the Company’s Audit Committee to approve all audit and nonaudit services to be performed by the independent auditors, such approval to take place in advance of such services when required by law, regulation, or rule.

40 

website (www.albint.com).


     The Chairman of the Audit Committee is permitted to preapprove any engagement of the independent auditor for services that could be properly preapproved by the Committee, provided that the anticipated fees with respect to the services so preapproved do not exceed $100,000. The Chairman is required to report such preapprovals to the next regular meeting of the Committee.

     The Audit Committee is required to preapprove each engagement of the independent auditor not preapproved by the Chairman of the Committee. Each such preapproval must describe the particular service to be rendered. No preapproval may be given for any service that would cause the independent auditor to be considered not independent under applicable laws and regulations, and the independent auditor is requested to confirm that such service will not compromise its independence as part of the preapproval process.

     With respect to the engagement of the independent auditor to provide routine and recurring audit-related tax and other nonaudit services, preapproval of the Audit Committee may take the form of approval of a schedule describing such services in reasonable detail and specifying an annual monetary limit. Each audit or nonaudit service (excluding tax services provided in the ordinary course) shall be reflected in a written engagement or other writing. In connection with the provision of permitted tax services, the independent auditor is required to, among other things, provide a written description of the services and discuss their impact on the auditor’s independence.

     None of the 2017 or 2018 services described above was approved by the Audit Committee or its Chairman pursuant to 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C), which permits the waiver of preapproval requirements in connection with the provision of certain nonaudit services.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR”
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
KPMG LLP

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder Proposals. The Company’s By Laws provide that proposals of stockholders, including nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors of the Company, shall not be presented, considered, or voted upon at an annual meeting of stockholders, or at any adjournment thereof, unless (i) notice of the proposal has been received by mail directed to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth in the Notice of Meeting not less than 100 days nor more than 180 days prior to the anniversary date of the last preceding annual meeting of stockholders, and (ii) the stockholder giving such notice is a stockholder of record on the date of the giving of such notice and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at such annual meeting. Each such notice shall set forth (i) the proposal desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for presenting such proposal at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of the stockholder making such proposal,

41

(iii) the number and class of shares owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder, (iv) any material interest of such stockholder in the proposal, and (v) such other information with respect to the proposal and such stockholder as is required to be disclosed in solicitation of proxies to vote upon such proposal, or is otherwise required, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Proxy Rules”). In the case of proposed nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors, each such notice shall also (i) set forth such information with respect to such nominees and the stockholder proposing the nominations as is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, pursuant to the Proxy Rules, and (ii) be accompanied by the written consent of each proposed nominee to being named in the Company’s proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected, and by written confirmation by each such nominee of the information relating to such nominee contained in the notice.


Proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented at the Company’s 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices at 216 Airport Drive, Rochester, New Hampshire 03867, not later than November 28, 2019December 1, 2021 in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy. In addition, to be so included, a proposal must otherwise comply with all applicable proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

41 


In addition, management proxies for the 20202021 Annual Meeting may confer discretionary authority to vote on a stockholder proposal that is not included in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy if the Company does not receive notice of such proposal by February 11, 2020,19, 2021, or if such proposal has been properly excluded from such proxy statement and form of proxy.

OTHER MATTERS


Other Matters. The Board knows of no other matters to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Should any other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote such proxy thereon in accordance with their best judgment.


The cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, regular employees of the Company, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone.

Charles J. Silva, Jr.
Secretary

Joseph M. Gaug
Secretary
March 27, 2019

42 

31, 2021

42

EXHIBIT


Exhibit A

APPENDIX A
Supplement to Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following information supplements the disclosures in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Proxy Statement under the heading “Performance Award Metrics and Goals” beginning on page 22.

Definitions relating to the 2018 APP and MPP awards

23.


“2018 Global MC Cash Flow”2020 AIN Adjusted EBITDA” —the amount reported as “Net Income” for the Global Machine Clothing business segment for 2018 in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for 2018,2020, less any income, or plus any expense, derived from the revaluation of non-functional currency assets and liabilities, adjusted by adding back, to the extent that such item reduced Net Income, or subtracting, to the extent that such item increased Net Income: (A) depreciation and amortization expense; (B) restructuring costs (including pension curtailment gains and losses related to restructuring actions but not reported as part of restructuring expenses in the financial statements), provided however, that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, choose to omit certain restructuring costs from this provision so long as the failure to add back those restructuring costs does not result in a higher Metric Percentage or reduced target goal; (C) any goodwill and intangible impairment; (D) income tax expenses (including any taxes recorded as operating expenses that were not included in the 20182020 Operating Plan approved by the Board of Directors); (E) net interest expense; (in each case, as determined in accordance with GAAP and the Company’s accounting policies, consistently applied)provided that the amount so determined shall then be further adjusted (1) to exclude the effect of any adjustments to the Company’s financial statements required to reflect the effect of (a) discontinued operations, or (b) newly effective accounting pronouncements, the effect of which were not incorporated into the Board approved operating plan (in each case, without duplication, as defined by GAAP and as included in the Company’s audited financial statements whether or not reflected as a separate line item in such audited financial statements); (2) to exclude (i) any gain or loss attributable to the sale of any business segment, or any real estate, during 2018,the Performance Period, net of any expenses incurred in connection with the transaction, or (ii) reallocated overhead costs which were otherwise attributable to any discontinued operations divested during the Performance Period; (3) to exclude any income (or loss) attributable to any business operation acquired during the Performance Period; (4) to exclude the effect on income of any charges incurred in the connection of the settlement of pension benefit funding obligations;obligations, or any other pension settlement or curtailment charges or credits that result from a strategic cost reduction initiative; (5) to exclude the effect on income of any deferred bank fee write-offs or interest rate swap buyouts related to any new financing facility established during 2018the Performance Period or any non-cash chargesgain or loss associated with the redemptionearly retirement of convertible notes; andany debt instrument; (6) to exclude the effect on income of any expenses, including consulting or professional fees, incurred in connection with any activities undertaken by management at the direction of the Board of Directors to investigate or pursue any strategic acquisitions, combinations, joint ventures or divestitures, regardless of whether such efforts result in the completion of such acquisition, combination, joint venture or divestiture during the Performance Period; andPeriod as the same may be applied to such business segment; (7) to exclude the cost of any lease expense incurred in connection with the sale and leaseback of any real estate (the foregoing hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Adjustments”) as the same may be applied to such business segmentthen further adjusting the resulting amount by: (X) deducting therefrom the aggregate sum of all approved Machine Clothing capital expenditures released during 2018, plus any over-budget capital expenditures costs or less any under budget capital expenditure costs budgeted regardless of the year in which released, adjustedestate; (8) to exclude the cost of any capital expenditures release during 2018 and any over or under budget capital expenditure costs that are attributablecharges required by Revenue Recognition Standard ASC 606 to recognize future losses relating to any business operations acquirednew long term contracts awarded during the year; (Y)performance period; (9) to exclude the effect on income of any fixed asset-write-offs related to continued and discontinued programs within the AEC business segment (including ASC), or any write-offs of previously capitalized costs related to non-recurring engineering and tooling for continued and discontinued programs; (10) by adding back or deducting charges or reductions to the reserve for recognized future losses related to the long term agreement for the supply of parts for the Rolls Royce BR725 engine; and (11) by adding back any expense related to machinery and equipment relocations orand plant setup costs, or other capital expenditures associated with anticipated or announced plant closings or consolidation of manufacturing capacity and not otherwise considered restructuring;restructuring costs.

“AIN TRIR” — the Total Recordable Incident Rate applicable to the entire Company for 2020. A recordable incident shall be any incident that is work-related and (Z) by increasing,results in injury, illness or decreasingdeath after applying the Occupation Safety and hazard Administration’s (OSHA) guidelines for work-relatedness and recordability. The TRIR shall be the number of recordable incidents per hundred employees per year, calculated as the case mayactual number of recordable incidents in the year times the quotient of 2000,000 divided by the actual hours worked by all employees in 2020, with 200,000 being the approximated hours worked by 100 employees in a year. The goal is to achieve a TRIR of 1.1 which would result in attaining a Performance Metric Percentage of 100%. The threshold would be a TRIR of 1.6, resulting in an attainment of 50% and the amount bymaximum achievement level would be a sum equalTRIR of .3, resulting in an attainment of 200%.

“AIN Compliance/External Auditors” - shall refer to the net decrease (or increase)findings in the aggregate sumfinal year-end internal control audit opinion provided by the Company’s auditors and included in the Company’s Annual Report to be filed in 2021. The Performance Metric goal shall be that there are no material weaknesses reported. The Maximum Performance Metric Percentage that can be attained under this Performance Metric shall be 100%. Therefore, the Performance Metric Percentage shall never exceed 100%, and the attainment level will be 100% only if the Performance Metric goal is achieved and no material weaknesses are reported. In the event any material weaknesses are reported, the Performance Metric Percentage attainment shall be 0%.

“AIN Compliance/Internal Auditors” shall refer to the status of Machine Clothing Accounts Receivable and Inventoriesthe remediation of any High or Medium findings in the Company’s internal audit reports issued during the Performance Period. Accounts Receivable and InventoriesThe Performance Metric goal shall in each case meanbe that all findings classified as High or Medium will have been remediated or are on schedule for remediation (i.e., not overdue) at the amountsend of the year according to the schedule set forth in the Company’s financial accounting systems and reported in the Company’s year-end consolidated financial statements for the applicable year in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to exclude (1) any Accounts Receivable or Inventories attributable to any business operations acquired during the applicable year and (2) the effect of currency fluctuations. For the purposes ofaudit report. The Maximum Performance Metric Percentage that can be attained under this definition, any funds released for the Company’s equipment contingency budgetPerformance Metric shall not reduce cash flow. For the purposes of determiningbe 100%. Therefore, the Metric Percentage achieved,attainment shall never exceed 100%, and the following goalsattainment lever will be 100%
A-1

only if all findings classified as High or Medium have been remediated or are established:

 Metric Percentage
Performance Metric0%50%100%150%200%
2018 Global MC     
Cash Flow< $100.1M≥ $100.1M≥ $166.8M≥ $200.2≥ $233.6M

A-1

on schedule for remediation (i.e., not overdue) at the end of the year according to the schedule set forth in the audit report. The Metric Performance attainment shall be reduced by 10% for each overdue and un-remediated finding at year-end and a performance achievement threshold of 50% has been established, so that if there are five or more findings overdue and un-remediated at year-end, the Performance Metric attainment shall be 0%.

“20182020 MC Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D”EBITDA”— the amount reported as “Net Income” from the Albany Engineered Composites business segment as reported in the Company’s 2018 Consolidated Statement of Income, exclusive of research and development costs and any amount recorded for the non-controlling interest in Albany Safran Composites (ASC), less any income, or plus any expense, derived from the revaluation of nonfunctional currency assets and liabilities, adjusted according to the Adjustments as the same may be applied to suchGlobal Machine Clothing business segment and further adjusted to exclude the effect on income of any fixed asset-write-offs related to specific discontinued programs within the AEC business segment (including ASC), any write-offs of previously capitalized costs related to non-recurring engineering and tooling for continued and discontinued programs, and adding back any expense related to machinery and equipment relocations, or other capital expenditures associated with plant closing or consolidation of manufacturing capacity, plus adding back charges related to any write-offs of previously capitalized costs or charges for recognized future losses, in both cases only as related to the long term agreement for the supply of parts for the Rolls Royce BR725 engine and to exclude the cost any charges required by revenue Recognition Standard ASC 606 to recognize future losses relating to any new long-term contracts awarded during the Performance Period. For the purposes of determining the Metric Percentage achieved, the following goals are established:

 Metric Percentage
Performance Metric0%50%100%150%200%
Adjusted Global AEC     
EBITDA excluding     
R&D< $40.8M≥ $40.8M≥ $68.0M≥ $81.6M≥ $95.2M

“2018 Other Cash Flow”shall be equal to that portion of “Net Income” for 2018 as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for 2018, which is in the aggregate attributable to the Global Information Systems (GIS) and Corporate cost centers and items reported as other income/expense, net,2020, less any income, or plus any expense, derived from the revaluation of non-functional currency assets and liabilities, adjusted accordingby adding back, to the Adjustmentsextent that such item reduced Net Income, or subtracting, to the extent that such item increased Net Income: (A) depreciation and amortization expense; (B) restructuring costs (including pension curtailment gains and losses related to restructuring actions but not reported as part of restructuring expenses in the financial statements), provided however, that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, choose to omit certain restructuring costs from this provision so long as the failure to add back those restructuring costs does not result in a higher Metric Percentage or reduced target goal; (C) any goodwill and intangible impairment; (D) income tax expenses (including any taxes recorded as operating expenses that were not included in the 2020 Operating Plan approved by the Board of Directors); (E) net interest expense; (in each case, as determined in accordance with GAAP and the Company’s accounting policies, consistently applied) provided that the amount so determined shall then be further adjusted (1) to exclude the effect of any adjustments to the Company’s financial statements required to reflect the effect of (a) discontinued operations, or (b) newly effective accounting pronouncements, the effect of which were not incorporated into the Board approved operating plan (in each case, without duplication, as defined by GAAP and as included in the Company’s audited financial statements whether or not reflected as a separate line item in such audited financial statements); (2) to exclude (i) any gain or loss attributable to the sale of any business segment, or any real estate, during the Performance Period, net of any expenses incurred in connection with the transaction, or (ii) reallocated overhead costs which were otherwise attributable to any discontinued operations divested during the Performance Period; (3) to exclude any income (or loss) attributable to any business operation acquired during the Performance Period; (4) to exclude the effect on income of any charges incurred in the connection of the settlement of pension benefit funding obligations, or any other pension settlement or curtailment charges or credits that result from a strategic cost reduction initiative; (5) to exclude the effect on income of any deferred bank fee write-offs or interest rate swap buyouts related to any new financing facility established during the Performance Period or any gain or loss associated with the early retirement of any debt instrument; (6) to exclude the effect on income of any expenses, including consulting or professional fees, incurred in connection with any activities undertaken by management at the direction of the Board of Directors to investigate or pursue any strategic acquisitions, combinations, joint ventures or divestitures, regardless of whether such efforts result in the completion of such acquisition, combination, joint venture or divestiture during the Performance Period as the same may be applied to such cost centers,then further adjustingbusiness segment; (7) to exclude the resulting amount by: (X) deducting therefrom the aggregate sumcost of any GISlease expense incurred in connection with the sale and leaseback of any real estate; (8) to exclude the cost of any charges required by Revenue Recognition Standard ASC 606 to recognize future losses relating to any new long term contracts awarded during the performance period; (9) by adding back any expense related to machinery and equipment relocations and plant setup costs, or Corporate approvedother capital expenditures releasedassociated with anticipated or announced plant closings or consolidation of manufacturing capacity and not otherwise considered restructuring costs.


“MC TRIR” - the Total Recordable Incident Rate applicable to the Global; Machine Clothing business segment for 2020. A recordable incident shall be any incident that is work-related and results in injury, illness or death after applying the Occupation Safety and hazard Administration’s (OSHA) guidelines for work-relatedness and recordability. The TRIR shall be the number of recordable incidents per hundred employees per year, calculated as the actual number of recordable incidents in the year times the quotient of 2000,000 divided by the actual hours worked by all employees in 2020, with 200,000 being the approximated hours worked by 100 employees in a year. The goal is to achieve a TRIR of 0.85, which would result in attaining a Performance Metric Percentage of 100%. The threshold would be a TRIR of 1.2, resulting in an attainment of 50% and the maximum achievement level would be a TRIR of .3, resulting in an attainment of 200%.

“MC Compliance/External Auditors” shall refer to the findings relating to the Global Machine Clothing business segment in the final year-end internal control audit opinion provided by the Company’s auditors and included in the Company’s Annual Report to be filed in 2021. The Performance Metric goal shall be that there are no material weaknesses reported related to the MC business unit. The Maximum Performance Metric Percentage that can be attained under this Performance Metric shall be 100%. Therefore, the Performance Metric Percentage shall never exceed 100%, and the attainment level will be 100% only if the Performance Metric goal is achieved and no material weaknesses are reported. In the event any material weaknesses are reported, the Performance Metric Percentage attainment shall be 0%.

“MC Compliance/Internal Auditors” shall refer to the status of the remediation of any High or Medium findings relating to the Global Machine Clothing business segment in the Company’s internal audit reports issued during 2018, plus any over-budget capital expenditures coststhe Performance Period. The Performance Metric goal shall be that all findings classified as High or less any under budget capital expenditure costs budgeted regardlessMedium will have been remediated or are on schedule for remediation (i.e., not overdue) at the end of the year according to the schedule set forth in the audit report. The Maximum Performance Metric Percentage that can be attained under this Performance Metric shall be 100%. Therefore, the Metric Percentage attainment shall never exceed 100%, and the attainment lever will be 100% only if all findings classified as High or Medium have been remediated or are on schedule for remediation (i.e., not overdue) at the end of the year according to the schedule set forth in the audit report. The Metric Performance attainment shall be reduced by 10% for each overdue and un-remediated finding at year-end and a
A-2

performance achievement threshold of 50% has been established, so that if there are five or more findings overdue and un-remediated at year-end, the Performance Metric attainment shall be 0%.

“2020 AEC ADJUSTED EBITDA” - the amount reported as “Net Income” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for 2020 attributable to the AEC business segment, less any income, or plus any expense, derived from the revaluation of non-functional currency assets and liabilities, adjusted by adding back, to the extent that such item reduced Net Income, or subtracting, to the extent that such item increased Net Income: (A) depreciation and amortization expense; (B) restructuring costs (including pension curtailment gains and losses related to restructuring actions but not reported as part of restructuring expenses in the financial statements), provided however, that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, choose to omit certain restructuring costs from this provision so long as the failure to add back those restructuring costs does not result in a higher Metric Percentage or reduced target goal; (C) any goodwill and intangible impairment; (D) income tax expenses (including any taxes recorded as operating expenses that were not included in the 2020 Operating Plan approved by the Board of Directors); (E) net interest expense; (in each case, as determined in accordance with GAAP and the Company’s accounting policies, consistently applied) provided that the amount so determined shall then be further adjusted (1) to exclude the effect of any adjustments to the Company’s financial statements required to reflect the effect of (a) discontinued operations, or (b) newly effective accounting pronouncements, the effect of which released, adjustedwere not incorporated into the Board approved operating plan (in each case, without duplication, as defined by GAAP and as included in the Company’s audited financial statements whether or not reflected as a separate line item in such audited financial statements); (2) to exclude (i) any gain or loss attributable to the sale of any business segment, or any real estate, during the Performance Period, net of any expenses incurred in connection with the transaction, or (ii) reallocated overhead costs which were otherwise attributable to any discontinued operations divested during the Performance Period; (3) to exclude any capital expenditures released during 2018 and any over or under budget capital expenditures costs that areincome (or loss) attributable to any business operationsoperation acquired during the Performance Period; (4) to exclude the effect on income of any charges incurred in the connection of the settlement of pension benefit funding obligations, or any other pension settlement or curtailment charges or credits that result from a strategic cost reduction initiative; (5) to exclude the effect on income of any deferred bank fee write-offs or interest rate swap buyouts related to any new financing facility established during the Performance Period or any gain or loss associated with the early retirement of any debt instrument; (6) to exclude the effect on income of any expenses, including consulting or professional fees, incurred in connection with any activities undertaken by management at the direction of the Board of Directors to investigate or pursue any strategic acquisitions, combinations, joint ventures or divestitures, regardless of whether such efforts result in the completion of such acquisition, combination, joint venture or divestiture during the Performance Period as the same may be applied to such business segment; (7) to exclude the cost of any lease expense incurred in connection with the sale and leaseback of any real estate; (8) to exclude the cost of any charges required by Revenue Recognition Standard ASC 606 to recognize future losses relating to any new long term contracts awarded during the performance period; (9) to exclude the effect on income of any fixed asset-write-offs related to continued and discontinued programs within the AEC business segment (including ASC), or any write-offs of previously capitalized costs related to non-recurring engineering and tooling for continued and discontinued programs; (10) by adding back or deducting charges or reductions to the reserve for recognized future losses related to the long term agreement for the supply of parts for the Rolls Royce BR725 engine; and (11) by adding back any expense related to machinery and equipment relocations and plant setup costs, or other capital expenditures associated with anticipated or announced plant closings or consolidation of manufacturing capacity and not otherwise considered restructuring costs.

“AEC TRIR” - the Total Recordable Incident Rate applicable to the AEC business segment for 2020. A recordable incident shall be any incident that is work-related and results in injury, illness or death after applying the Occupation Safety and hazard Administration’s (OSHA) guidelines for work-relatedness and recordability. The TRIR shall be the number of recordable incidents per hundred employees per year, calculated as the actual number of recordable incidents in the year times the quotient of 2000,000 divided by the actual hours worked by all employees in 2020, with 200,000 being the approximated hours worked by 100 employees in a year. ForThe goal is to achieve a TRIR of 1.5, which would result in attaining a Performance Metric Percentage of 100%. The threshold would be a TRIR of 2.3, resulting in an attainment of 50% and the purposesmaximum achievement level would be a TRIR of determining.35, resulting in an attainment of 200%.

“AEC Compliance/External Auditors” shall refer to the findings relating to the AEC business segment in the final year-end internal control audit opinion provided by the Company’s auditors and included in the Company’s Annual Report to be filed in 2021. The Performance Metric goal shall be that there are no material weaknesses reported. The Maximum Performance Metric Percentage that can be attained under this Performance Metric shall be 100%. Therefore, the Performance Metric Percentage shall never exceed 100%, and the attainment level will be 100% only if the Performance Metric goal is achieved and no material weaknesses are reported. In the event any material weaknesses are reported, the Performance Metric Percentage attainment shall be 0%.

“AEC Compliance/Internal Auditors” shall refer to the status of the remediation of any High or Medium findings relating to the AEC business segment in the Company’s internal audit reports issued during the Performance Period. The Performance Metric goal shall be that all findings classified as High or Medium will have been remediated or are on schedule for remediation (i.e., not overdue) at the end of the year according to the schedule set forth in the audit report. The Maximum Performance Metric Percentage that can be attained under this Performance Metric shall be 100%. Therefore, the Metric Percentage achieved,attainment shall never exceed 100%, and the following goalsattainment lever will be 100% only if all findings classified as High or Medium have been remediated or are established:

on schedule for remediation (i.e., not overdue) at the end of the year according to the schedule set forth in the audit report. The Metric Performance attainment shall be reduced by 10% for each overdue and un-remediated finding at year-end and a performance achievement threshold
 Metric Percentage
Performance Metric0%50%100%150%200%
2018 Other Cash Flow< -$68.1M≥ -$68.1M≥ -52.4M≥ -$41.9M≥ -$31.4M
A-3


of 50% has been established, so that if there are five or more findings overdue and un-remediated at year-end, the Performance Metric attainment shall be 0%.
“Aggregate AIN Adjusted EBITDA” — the aggregate of amount of AIN Adjusted EBITDA (as defined above) reported in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

“Aggregate MC Adjusted Reported EBITDA” — the aggregate amount of MC Adjusted Reported EBITDA (as defined above) reported in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

“Aggregate AEC Adjusted EBITDA” - the aggregate amount of AEC Adjusted Reported EBITDA (as defined above) reported in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

Definitions relating to the 2018 MPP Awards

“Aggregate Global MC Cash Flow”— the aggregate amount reported as Global MC Cash Flow (as defined above) in 2018, 2019, and 2020.

“Aggregate Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D”— the aggregate total amount of Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D (as defined above) in 2018, 2019, and 2020.

Definitions relating to the 2016 MPP Awards

     “Aggregate Global MC Cash Flow” - the total of Global MC Cash Flow in 2016,2018, plus Global MC Cash Flow in 2017,2019, plus Global MC Cash Flow in 2018,2020, where Global MC Cash Flow for each year is equal to the amount reported as “Net Income” for the Global Machine Clothing business segment for the applicable year in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income, less any income, or plus any expense, derived from the revaluation of non-functional currency assets and liabilities, adjusted by adding back, to the extent that such item reduced Net Income, or subtracting, to the extent that such item increased Net Income: (A) depreciation and amortization expense; (B) restructuring costs, provided however, that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, choose to omit certain restructuring costs from this provision so long as the failure to add back those restructuring costs does not result in a higher Metric Percentage or reduced target goal; (C) any goodwill and intangible impairment; (D) income tax expenses; (E) net interest expense; (in each case, as determined in accordance with GAAP and the Company’s accounting policies, consistently applied)provided that the amount so determined shall then be further adjusted (1) to exclude the effect of any adjustments to the Company’s financial statements required to reflect the effect of (a) discontinued operations, or (b) newly effective accounting pronouncements, the effect of which were

A-2

not incorporated into the Board approved operating plan (in each case, without duplication, as defined by GAAP and as included in the Company’s audited financial statements whether or not reflected as a separate line item in such audited financial statements); (2) to exclude (i) any gain or loss attributable to the sale of any business segment, or any real estate, during the applicable year,Performance Period, net of any expenses incurred in connection with the transaction, or (ii) reallocated overhead costs which were otherwise attributable to any discontinued operations divested during the year;Performance Period; (3) to exclude any income (or loss) attributable to any business operation acquired during the year;Performance Period; (4) to exclude the effect on income of any charges incurred in the connection of the settlement of pension benefit funding obligations; (5) to exclude the effect on income of any deferred bank fee write-offs or interest rate swap buyouts related to any new financing facility established during the yearPerformance Period or any non-cash chargesgain or loss associated with the redemptionearly retirement of convertible notes;any debt instrument; (6) to exclude the effect on income of any expenses, including consulting or professional fees, incurred in connection with any activities undertaken by management at the direction of the Board of Directors to investigate or pursue any strategic acquisitions, combinations, joint ventures or divestitures, regardless of whether such efforts result in the completion of such acquisition, combination, joint venture or divestiture during the year;Performance Period as the same may be applied to such business segment; and (7) to exclude the cost of any lease expense incurred in connection with the sale and leaseback of any real estate.estate, then further adjusting the resulting amount by:by: (X) deducting therefrom the aggregate sum of all approved Machine Clothing capital expenditures released during the year,Performance Period, plus any over-budget capital expenditures costs or less any under budget capital expenditure costs budgeted regardless of the year in which released;released, adjusted to exclude any capital expenditures released during the performance period and any over or under budget capital expenditure costs that are attributable to any business operations acquired during the performance period; (Y) adding back any expense related to machinery and equipment relocations and plant setup costs, or other capital expenditures associated with anticipate or announced plant closings or consolidation of manufacturing capacity;capacity and not otherwise considered restructuring; and (Z) by increasing, or decreasing as the case may be, the amount by a sum equal to the net decrease (or increase) in the aggregate sum of Machine Clothing Accounts Receivable and Inventories during the Performance Period. Accounts Receivable and Inventories shall in each case mean the amounts set forth in the Company’s financial accounting systems and reported in the Company’s year-end consolidated financial statements for the applicable year in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to exclude (1) any Accounts Receivable or Inventories attributable to any business operations acquired during the applicable year and (2) the effect of currency fluctuations. For the purposes of this definition, any funds released for the Company’s equipment contingency budget shall not reduce cash flow. For the purposes of determining the Metric Percentage achieved, the following goals were established:

 Metric Percentage
Performance Metrics0%50%100%150%200%
1. Aggregate Global     
MC Cash Flow< $349.4M≥ $349.4M≥ $499.2M≥ $598.0M≥ $698.9M

“Aggregate Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D”- — the total of Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D in 2016,2018, plus Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D in 2017,2019, plus Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D in 2018,2020, where Adjusted Global AEC EBITDA excluding R&D for each year is equal to the amount reported as “Net Income” from the Albany Engineered Composites (“AEC”) business segment for the applicable year, as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income, exclusive of research and development costs and any amount recorded for the non-controlling interest in Albany Safran Composites (“ASC”), less any income, or plus any expense, derived from the revaluation of non-functional currency assets and liabilities, adjusted by adding back, to the extent that such expense reduced Operating Income, or subtracting to the extent that such item increased Operating Income: (A) depreciation and amortization expense; (B) restructuring costs, provided however, that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, choose to omit certain restructuring costs from this provision so long as the failure to add back those restructuring costs does not result in a higher Metric Percentage or reduced target goal; (C) any goodwill impairment; (D)
A-4

income tax expense; (E) net interest expense (in each case, as determined in accordance with GAAP and the Company’s accounting policies, consistently applied)providedthat the amount so determined shall then be further adjusted (1) to exclude the effect of any adjustments to the Company’s financial statements required to reflect the effect of (a) discontinued operations, or (b) newly effective accounting pronouncements, the effect of which were not incorporated into the Board approved operating plan (in each case, without duplication, as defined by GAAP and as included in the Company’s audited financial statements whether or not reflected as a separate line item in such audited financial statements); (2) to exclude (i) any gain or loss attributable to the sale of any business segment, or any real estate, during the year,Performance Period, net of any expenses incurred in connection with the transaction, or (ii) reallocated overhead costs which were otherwise attributable to any discontinued operations divested during the year;Performance Period; (3) to exclude any income (or loss) attributable to any business operation acquired during the year;Performance Period; (4) to exclude the effect on income of any charges incurred in the connection of the settlement of pension benefit funding obligations; (5) to exclude the effect on income of any deferred bank fee write-offs or interest rate swap buyouts related to any new financing facility

A-3

established during the yearPerformance Period or any non-cash chargesgain or loss associated with the redemptionearly retirement of convertible notes;any debt instrument; (6) to exclude the effect on income of any expenses, including consulting or professional fees, incurred in connection with any activities undertaken by management at the direction of the Board of Directors to investigate or pursue any strategic acquisitions, combinations, joint ventures or divestitures, regardless of whether such efforts result in the completion of such acquisition, combination, joint venture or divestiture during the year;Performance Period; and (7) to exclude the cost of any lease expense incurred in connection with the sale and leaseback of any real estate as the same may be applied to such business segment. Forsegment and further adjusted to exclude the purposeseffect on income of determiningany fixed asset-write-offs related to continued and discontinued programs within the Metric Percentage achieved,AEC business segment (including ASC), any write-offs of previously capitalized costs related to non-recurring engineering and tooling for continued and discontinued programs, and adding back any expense related to machinery and equipment relocations, or other capital expenditures associated with plant closings or consolidation of manufacturing capacity, plus adding back charges related to any write-offs of previously capitalized costs or charges for recognized future losses, in both cases only as related to the following goals were established:

 Metric Percentage
Performance Metrics0%50%100%150%200%
1. Aggregate Adjusted     
Global AEC EBITDA     
excluding R&D< $80.4M≥ $80.4M≥ $125.6M≥ $160.7M≥ $195.5M

A-4

long term agreement for the supply of parts for the Rolls Royce BR725 engine.

A-5

 


image2a.jpg

 


image1a.jpg